Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 26;19(6):e0306113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306113. eCollection 2024.
Facial mimicry, the tendency to imitate facial expressions of other individuals, has been shown to play a critical role in the processing of emotion expressions. At the same time, there is evidence suggesting that its role might change when the cognitive demands of the situation increase. In such situations, understanding another person is dependent on working memory. However, whether facial mimicry influences working memory representations for facial emotion expressions is not fully understood. In the present study, we experimentally interfered with facial mimicry by using established behavioral procedures, and investigated how this interference influenced working memory recall for facial emotion expressions. Healthy, young adults (N = 36) performed an emotion expression n-back paradigm with two levels of working memory load, low (1-back) and high (2-back), and three levels of mimicry interference: high, low, and no interference. Results showed that, after controlling for block order and individual differences in the perceived valence and arousal of the stimuli, the high level of mimicry interference impaired accuracy when working memory load was low (1-back) but, unexpectedly, not when load was high (2-back). Working memory load had a detrimental effect on performance in all three mimicry conditions. We conclude that facial mimicry might support working memory for emotion expressions when task load is low, but that the supporting effect possibly is reduced when the task becomes more cognitively challenging.
面部模仿,即倾向于模仿他人的面部表情,已被证明在情绪表达的处理中起着关键作用。同时,有证据表明,当情境的认知要求增加时,其作用可能会发生变化。在这种情况下,理解他人依赖于工作记忆。然而,面部模仿是否会影响面部情绪表达的工作记忆表示,目前还不完全清楚。在本研究中,我们通过使用既定的行为程序来实验性地干扰面部模仿,并研究这种干扰如何影响面部情绪表达的工作记忆回忆。健康的年轻成年人(N=36)在两个工作记忆负荷水平(低负荷[1 次回溯]和高负荷[2 次回溯])下进行情绪表达 n 次回溯范式,并进行了三种模仿干扰水平:高、低和无干扰。结果表明,在控制了块顺序和个体对刺激的感知效价和唤醒度的差异后,高模仿干扰水平在工作记忆负荷较低(1 次回溯)时会降低准确性,但出乎意料的是,在负荷较高(2 次回溯)时不会降低准确性。工作记忆负荷在所有三种模仿条件下都对表现产生了不利影响。我们得出结论,当任务负荷较低时,面部模仿可能支持情绪表达的工作记忆,但当任务变得更加具有认知挑战性时,支持效应可能会降低。