Suppr超能文献

单病灶颅内 SRS 中 DCA 和 VMAT 方法的剂量适形性和剂量跌落。

Dose conformity and falloff in single-lesion intracranial SRS with DCA and VMAT methods.

机构信息

Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute, Hudson, Florida, USA.

AdventHealth, Daytona Beach, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Sep;25(9):e14415. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14415. Epub 2024 Jun 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) aims at achieving highly conformal dose distribution and, at the same time, attaining rapid dose falloff outside the treatment target. SRS is performed using different techniques including dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

PURPOSE

In this study, we compare dose conformity and falloff in DCA and VMAT plans for SRS with a single target.

METHODS

To compare dose conformity in SRS plans, we employ a novel conformity index , RTOG conformity index ( ), and Riet-Paddick conformity index ( ). In addition, we use indices , , and to evaluate dose falloff. For each of the considered 118 cases of SRS, two plans were created using DCA and VMAT. A two-tailed Student's t-test was used to evaluate the difference between the employed indices for the DCA and VMAT plans.

RESULTS

The studied VMAT plans were characterized by higher dose conformity than the DCA plans. The differences between the conformity indices for the DCA plans and VMAT plans were statistically significant. The DCA plans had a smaller number of monitor units (MUs) and smaller indices R50%, V , and V than the VMAT plans. However, the differences between R50%, V , and V for the DCA and VMAT plans were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the studied VMAT plans had higher dose conformity, they also had larger MUs than the DCA plans. In terms of dose falloff characterized by parameters R50%, V , and V , DCA serves as a reasonable alternative to VMAT in the case of a single brain metastasis.

摘要

背景

颅内立体定向放射外科(SRS)旨在实现高度适形的剂量分布,同时在治疗靶区外实现快速剂量下降。SRS 采用不同的技术进行,包括动态适形弧(DCA)和容积调制弧形治疗(VMAT)。

目的

本研究比较了单靶 SRS 中 DCA 和 VMAT 计划的剂量适形性和剂量衰减。

方法

为了比较 SRS 计划的剂量适形性,我们采用了一种新的适形性指数 、RTOG 适形性指数( )和 Riet-Paddick 适形性指数( )。此外,我们还使用了 、 和 来评估剂量衰减。对于考虑的 118 例 SRS 病例中的每一个,我们使用 DCA 和 VMAT 分别创建了两个计划。采用双尾学生 t 检验来评估 DCA 和 VMAT 计划之间所使用的指数的差异。

结果

所研究的 VMAT 计划具有比 DCA 计划更高的剂量适形性。DCA 计划和 VMAT 计划的适形性指数之间的差异具有统计学意义。DCA 计划的监测单位(MUs)数量较少,且 R50%、V 和 V 指数也较小,而 VMAT 计划则相反。然而,DCA 和 VMAT 计划的 R50%、V 和 V 指数之间的差异无统计学意义。

结论

尽管所研究的 VMAT 计划具有更高的剂量适形性,但与 DCA 计划相比,它们的 MU 数量也更大。就 R50%、V 和 V 等参数所表征的剂量衰减而言,DCA 是单个脑转移的情况下替代 VMAT 的合理选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验