Suppr超能文献

皮下注射与静脉注射托珠单抗治疗重症 COVID-19 患者的效果:系统评价。

Effect of subcutaneous vs. intravenous tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030001, China.

School of Pharmacy, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan Shanxi, 030001, China.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Oct;80(10):1523-1530. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03719-0. Epub 2024 Jun 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19 and provide evidence for the rational use of subcutaneous tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, SinoMed, and Wanfang Medical Network electronic databases up to 11 January 2023 to identify relevant studies. To obtain the most recent clinical studies of subcutaneous injection of tocilizumab for the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19, we also searched the preprint platforms medRxiv and ChinaXiv. Furthermore, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant unpublished studies. The studies were screened based on the PICOS principle. The included studies were classified and evaluated for quality based on research type. The RevMan 5.3 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis, and a descriptive analysis was performed to examine relevant outcome indicators.

RESULTS

Five observational studies were obtained, involving a total of 498 patients (240 patients in the subcutaneous injection group and 258 patients in the intravenous injection group). All of the studies were of the highest quality. The meta-analysis of the included studies revealed that the mortality rate of patients who received subcutaneous tocilizumab to treat COVID-19 was not significantly higher than that of the intravenous injection group [23.3% (45/193) vs. 18.4% (39/212), RD = 0.06, 95% CI = - 0.01 ~ 0.13, P = 0.11]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients requiring mechanical ventilation between the two groups [24.5% (35/143) vs. 22% (35/159), RD = 0.03, 95% CI = - 0.07 ~ 0.12, P = 0.56].

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analyses do not provide evidence that subcutaneous and intravenous tocilizumab formulations for the treatment of severe COVID-19 infection differ regarding their effectiveness. Considering that the meta-analyses cannot replace an appropriately powered non-inferiority study, subcutaneous formulations still need to be used with caution and only when intravenous formulations are in short supply. At present, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials of subcutaneous injection of tocilizumab for the treatment of severe COVID-19, and more clinical research should be conducted.

摘要

目的

系统评价皮下注射托珠单抗治疗重症 COVID-19 患者的疗效,为重症 COVID-19 患者合理使用皮下注射托珠单抗提供证据。

方法

本研究按照 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses(PRISMA)声明进行荟萃分析。检索 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、Embase、中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方医学网等电子数据库,检索时限均从建库至 2023 年 1 月 11 日,以获取有关皮下注射托珠单抗治疗重症 COVID-19 患者的相关研究。为获取最新的关于托珠单抗皮下注射治疗重症 COVID-19 的临床研究,还检索了预印本平台 medRxiv 和 ChinaXiv。同时,在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上检索未发表的相关研究。根据 PICOS 原则筛选研究。根据研究类型对纳入的研究进行分类和质量评估。使用 RevMan 5.3 软件进行荟萃分析,并对相关结局指标进行描述性分析。

结果

共纳入 5 项观察性研究,共计 498 例患者(皮下注射组 240 例,静脉注射组 258 例)。所有研究均为高质量研究。纳入研究的荟萃分析结果显示,接受皮下注射托珠单抗治疗的 COVID-19 患者的死亡率并不高于静脉注射组[23.3%(45/193)比 18.4%(39/212),RD=0.06,95%CI=−0.010.13,P=0.11]。两组患者需要机械通气的比例也无显著差异[24.5%(35/143)比 22%(35/159),RD=0.03,95%CI=−0.070.12,P=0.56]。

结论

本荟萃分析结果未提供证据表明,治疗严重 COVID-19 感染的皮下和静脉制剂在疗效上存在差异。考虑到荟萃分析不能替代适当的非劣效性研究,皮下制剂仍需谨慎使用,且仅在静脉制剂短缺时使用。目前,尚无关于托珠单抗皮下注射治疗重症 COVID-19 的随机对照试验,需要开展更多的临床研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验