A comparison of atenolol and long-acting trimazosin in mild to moderate essential hypertension.

In a 12-week double-blind randomised study the efficacy of atenolol and a new longer-acting formulation of trimazosin were compared when given once daily in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Two parallel groups, each consisting of 18 patients, were studied. At randomisation the two groups were well matched for age and sex distribution. They were also well matched for blood pressure, pulse rate and body weight; these latter measurements were recorded at regular intervals during the 12 weeks of study. Atenolol produced substantial reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and in heart rate, during 12 weeks of treatment. This therapeutic effect was maintained until the next dose after 24 hours. Trimazosin, by comparison, failed to reduce either systolic or diastolic pressure, or to alter heart rate. Side effects were minor with both agents and compliance with treatment was good. Atenolol caused significant elevation of plasma concentration of triglyceride, with reduction in high density lipoprotein concentration when compared with trimazosin. In conclusion, atenolol was confirmed as an effective agent for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. By comparison trimazosin in the longer-acting formulation was ineffective in this study. However, trimazosin may still find a place in treatment if used at higher dose.