• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

矩形块状种植体在吸收性牙槽嵴中的压入式植入:手术及生物力学考量

Press-Fit Placement of a Rectangular Block Implant in the Resorbed Alveolar Ridge: Surgical and Biomechanical Considerations.

作者信息

Gazelakis Efthimios, Judge Roy B, Palamara Joseph E A, Subramanian Shiva, Nazir Mohsin

机构信息

Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.

Department of Prosthodontics, Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.

出版信息

Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 May 23;11(6):532. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11060532.

DOI:10.3390/bioengineering11060532
PMID:38927768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11200368/
Abstract

Rectangular Block Implant (RBIs) were manufactured, using computer-aided-design lathe turning, surface roughened with grit blasting and gamma irradiated. Implants were surgically placed into the resorbed edentulous mandibular ridges of both greyhound dogs (ex vivo and in vivo) and humans; the pooled total was 17 placements. The aim was to achieve mechanical stability and full implant submergence without damage to the mandibular canal and without bone fracture: fulfilment of all of these criteria was deemed to be a successful surgical outcome. Rectangular osteotomy sites were prepared with piezo surgical instrumentation. Sixteen implants were fully submerged and achieved good primary stability without bone fracture and without evidence of impingement of the mandibular canal. One implant placement was deemed a failure due to bone fracture: the event of a random successful outcome was rejected ( < 0.01 confidence, binomial analysis). Technique of placement yielded excellent mechanical retention: key biomechanical factors that emerged in this process included under preparation of the osteotomy site with the use of specifically designed trial-fit gauges, the viscoelastic property of the peri-implant bone, the flat faces and cornered edges of the block surfaces which enhance stress distribution and mechanical retention, respectively. It was concluded that the surgical protocol for the RBI placement in the resorbed alveolus is a predictable clinical procedure tailored to its specific, unique biomechanical profile.

摘要

采用计算机辅助设计的车床车削工艺制造矩形块状种植体(RBIs),通过喷砂处理使其表面粗糙化,并进行γ射线辐照。将种植体通过手术植入灵缇犬(体外和体内)及人类的吸收性无牙下颌牙槽嵴中;总共植入了17枚。目的是实现机械稳定性和种植体完全埋入,同时不损伤下颌管且不发生骨折:满足所有这些标准被视为手术成功。使用压电手术器械制备矩形截骨部位。16枚种植体完全埋入,实现了良好的初期稳定性,未发生骨折且无下颌管受撞击的迹象。1次种植体植入因骨折被判定失败:随机成功结果的事件被排除(二项式分析,置信度<0.01)。植入技术产生了优异的机械固位力:在此过程中出现的关键生物力学因素包括使用专门设计的试戴规对截骨部位进行欠预备、种植体周围骨的粘弹性特性、块状表面的平面和带角边缘,分别增强了应力分布和机械固位力。得出的结论是,在吸收性牙槽嵴中植入RBIs的手术方案是一种针对其特定、独特生物力学特征的可预测临床程序。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/93c2433c9fc0/bioengineering-11-00532-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/7c3770820714/bioengineering-11-00532-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/a3bc81b85b53/bioengineering-11-00532-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/3939893634d9/bioengineering-11-00532-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/0482c02ab864/bioengineering-11-00532-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/420e2a9ad4f3/bioengineering-11-00532-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/5b6e57ae5eba/bioengineering-11-00532-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/d4a81662e6f4/bioengineering-11-00532-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/036cea58b8d1/bioengineering-11-00532-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/10cf3ec1cc7f/bioengineering-11-00532-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/e60e81879d28/bioengineering-11-00532-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/91f483f1c1eb/bioengineering-11-00532-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/c57eab26bca6/bioengineering-11-00532-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/aa72c1d2cc9d/bioengineering-11-00532-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/f4e3194cd167/bioengineering-11-00532-g014a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/6b071716726a/bioengineering-11-00532-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/6a5354253528/bioengineering-11-00532-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/fab71b6e889e/bioengineering-11-00532-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/93c2433c9fc0/bioengineering-11-00532-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/7c3770820714/bioengineering-11-00532-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/a3bc81b85b53/bioengineering-11-00532-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/3939893634d9/bioengineering-11-00532-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/0482c02ab864/bioengineering-11-00532-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/420e2a9ad4f3/bioengineering-11-00532-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/5b6e57ae5eba/bioengineering-11-00532-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/d4a81662e6f4/bioengineering-11-00532-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/036cea58b8d1/bioengineering-11-00532-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/10cf3ec1cc7f/bioengineering-11-00532-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/e60e81879d28/bioengineering-11-00532-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/91f483f1c1eb/bioengineering-11-00532-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/c57eab26bca6/bioengineering-11-00532-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/aa72c1d2cc9d/bioengineering-11-00532-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/f4e3194cd167/bioengineering-11-00532-g014a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/6b071716726a/bioengineering-11-00532-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/6a5354253528/bioengineering-11-00532-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/fab71b6e889e/bioengineering-11-00532-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c438/11200368/93c2433c9fc0/bioengineering-11-00532-g018.jpg

相似文献

1
Press-Fit Placement of a Rectangular Block Implant in the Resorbed Alveolar Ridge: Surgical and Biomechanical Considerations.矩形块状种植体在吸收性牙槽嵴中的压入式植入:手术及生物力学考量
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 May 23;11(6):532. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11060532.
2
The biomechanical profile of an osseo-integrated rectangular block implant: A pilot in vivo experimental study.骨整合矩形块植入物的生物力学特征:一项体内实验研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Nov;32(11):1274-1287. doi: 10.1111/clr.13834. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
3
Cortical tenting grafting technique in the severely atrophic alveolar ridge for implant site preparation.严重萎缩性牙槽嵴种植位点预备的皮质帐篷移植技术
Implant Dent. 2008 Mar;17(1):40-50. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318166d503.
4
The Biomechanical Profile of an Osseo-Integrated Rectangular Block Implant: A Pilot In Vivo Strain Analysis.骨结合型矩形块状种植体的生物力学特征:一项体内应变分析的初步研究
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Aug 30;9(9):425. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9090425.
5
[Clinical effects of ridge augmentation with the half-columnar shaped mandibular bone block for the placement of dental implants].[半柱状下颌骨块骨增量术用于牙种植体植入的临床效果]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2010 Feb 18;42(1):94-7.
6
Ridge expansion alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration to facilitate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges: a retrospective study.单纯牙槽嵴扩展或联合引导骨再生以促进在狭窄牙槽嵴中植入种植体:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Feb;26(2):204-11. doi: 10.1111/clr.12317. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
7
Design and ex vivo characterization of narrow implants with custom piezo-activated osteotomy for patients with substantial bone loss.设计并对具有定制压电激活截骨术的窄型种植体进行离体特征分析,用于治疗严重骨质流失的患者。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020 Jun;6(3):336-344. doi: 10.1002/cre2.276. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
8
Reconstruction of posterior mandibular alveolar ridge deficiencies with the piezoelectric hinge-assisted ridge split technique: a retrospective observational report.应用压电铰链辅助牙槽嵴劈开技术重建下颌后牙牙槽嵴缺损:回顾性观察报告。
J Periodontol. 2010 Nov;81(11):1580-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100093. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
9
Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.用于在上颌和下颌萎缩无牙颌中植入种植体的替代性骨扩张技术。
J Oral Implantol. 2011 Aug;37(4):463-71. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00028. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
10
On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading.关于固定装置数量、手术技术及负重时机的作用。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2008(197):3-95.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibacterial Calcium Phosphate Coatings for Biomedical Applications Fabricated via Micro-Arc Oxidation.通过微弧氧化制备的用于生物医学应用的抗菌磷酸钙涂层
Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Sep 21;8(5):444. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8050444.
2
Placement accuracy and primary stability of implants in the esthetic zone using dynamic and static computer-assisted navigation: A retrospective case-control study.使用动态和静态计算机辅助导航技术在美学区域植入物的定位准确性和初期稳定性:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Mar;131(3):427-435. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
3
The Biomechanical Profile of an Osseo-Integrated Rectangular Block Implant: A Pilot In Vivo Strain Analysis.
骨结合型矩形块状种植体的生物力学特征:一项体内应变分析的初步研究
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Aug 30;9(9):425. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9090425.
4
The biomechanical profile of an osseo-integrated rectangular block implant: A pilot in vivo experimental study.骨整合矩形块植入物的生物力学特征:一项体内实验研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Nov;32(11):1274-1287. doi: 10.1111/clr.13834. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
5
Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.同期自体骨块移植种植体植入:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Apr 30;7(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00311-4.
6
The effect of different interference fits on the primary fixation of a cementless femoral component during experimental testing.不同过盈配合对实验测试中无水泥股骨部件初始固定的影响。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Jan;113:104189. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104189. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
7
Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0.报告动物研究:ARRIVE 指南 2.0 的解释和说明。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 14;18(7):e3000411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411. eCollection 2020 Jul.
8
Effect of bone quality and quantity on the primary stability of dental implants in a simulated bicortical placement.骨质量和数量对模拟双皮质植入物初级稳定性的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar;25(3):1265-1272. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03432-z. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
9
Endosseous distal extension (EDE) blade implant technique useful to provide stable pillars in the ipotrophic lower posterior sector: 22 years statistical survey.骨内远侧延伸 (EDE) 叶片植入技术有助于在下后萎缩区提供稳定的支柱:22 年的统计调查。
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2019 Jan-Dec;33:2058738419838092. doi: 10.1177/2058738419838092.
10
Trends in Dental Implant Use in the U.S., 1999-2016, and Projections to 2026.美国 1999-2016 年种植牙使用趋势及 2026 年预测。
J Dent Res. 2018 Dec;97(13):1424-1430. doi: 10.1177/0022034518792567. Epub 2018 Aug 3.