Al-Yateem Nabeel, Mottershead Richard, Refaat Ahmad Fatma, Arsyad Subu Muhammad
Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Nurse Res. 2024 Sep 11;32(3):35-41. doi: 10.7748/nr.2024.e1933. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
Nominal group technique (NGT) is widely used in healthcare research to facilitate decision-making and consensus-building. Traditional NGT requires face-to-face interaction and its limitations include potential biases, logistical challenges and high costs. The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a shift to virtual methods, which led to the development of virtual nominal group technique (vNGT). Aim To reflect on the use of vNGT, particularly in the context of Ghader et al (2023 ), to understand its effectiveness in overcoming the limitations of traditional NGT and on its applicability in pandemic-affected scenarios.
This paper reviews and discusses literature on the use and effectiveness of NGT compared to other consensus-building methods and examines the emergence of vNGT in overcoming the limitations of traditional NGT. The authors also reflect on their use of vNGT in a study to identify cardiovascular research priorities in the UAE and provide details of its implementation.
vNGT bridges the gap between the localised nature of traditional NGT and the global reach of the Delphi technique. It allows for the inclusion of diverse participants, saves costs and offers time-efficiency. The study demonstrated vNGT's adaptability, with participants engaging in idea generation, discussion and prioritisation using online tools. However, challenges persist with vNGT, including reduced accessibility for certain demographics, timing issues across time zones and technical difficulties.
vNGT successfully integrates the interactive, consensus-building aspects of NGT with the broad reach of Delphi. It can be valuable in research and decision-making, especially in an era of increased remote collaboration.
vNGT can significantly impact healthcare research and policy formulation by enabling more inclusive, cost-effective and timely consensus-building processes. However, considerations for accessibility and technical support are crucial for its wider adoption and effectiveness.
名义群体技术(NGT)在医疗保健研究中被广泛用于促进决策制定和达成共识。传统的名义群体技术需要面对面互动,其局限性包括潜在的偏差、后勤挑战和高成本。新冠疫情使得转向虚拟方法成为必要,这促使了虚拟名义群体技术(vNGT)的发展。目的反思vNGT的使用情况,特别是在加德尔等人(2023年)的背景下,以了解其在克服传统名义群体技术局限性方面的有效性以及在受疫情影响场景中的适用性。
本文回顾并讨论了与其他达成共识方法相比名义群体技术的使用和有效性的文献,并研究了vNGT在克服传统名义群体技术局限性方面的出现情况。作者还反思了他们在阿联酋确定心血管研究重点的一项研究中对vNGT的使用,并提供了其实施细节。
vNGT弥合了传统名义群体技术的局部性与德尔菲技术的全球覆盖范围之间的差距。它允许纳入不同的参与者,节省成本并提供时间效率。该研究证明了vNGT的适应性,参与者使用在线工具进行想法生成、讨论和优先级排序。然而,vNGT仍然存在挑战,包括某些人群的可及性降低、跨时区的时间问题和技术困难。
vNGT成功地将名义群体技术的互动性、达成共识的方面与德尔菲技术的广泛覆盖范围结合在一起。它在研究和决策中可能具有价值,特别是在远程协作增加的时代。
vNGT可以通过实现更具包容性、成本效益和及时性的共识建立过程,对医疗保健研究和政策制定产生重大影响。然而,可及性和技术支持的考虑对于其更广泛的采用和有效性至关重要。