Park Se-Jun, Park Jin-Sung, Kang Dong-Ho, Kim Hyun-Jun, Lee Chong-Suh
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul , Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyand University School of Medicine, Guri , Republic of Korea.
Neurosurgery. 2025 Feb 1;96(2):308-317. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003075. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
Appropriate correction relative to the age-adjusted sagittal alignment target reduces the proximal junctional failure (PJF) risk. Nonetheless, a considerable number of patients suffer from PJF despite optimal correction. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors of PJF that occurs despite optimal correction relative to the sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) in adult spinal deformity surgery.
Patients aged 60 years or older with adult spinal deformity who underwent ≥5-level fusion to the sacrum were initially screened. Among them, only patients who achieved optimal sagittal correction relative to the SAAS were included in the study. Optimal correction was defined as the SAAS point between -1 and +1. Various clinical and radiographic factors were compared between the PJF and no PJF groups and were further evaluated using multivariate analysis.
The final study cohort comprised 127 patients. The mean age was 67 years, and there were 111 women (87.4%). A mean of total fusion length was 7.2. PJF occurred in 42 patients (33.1%), while 85 patients (66.9%) did not develop PJF. Multivariate analysis showed that a high body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 1.153, 95% CI = 1.027-1.295, P = .016), a higher lordosis distribution index (LDI) (OR = 1.024, 95% CI = 1.003-1.045, P = .022), and no use of hook fixation (OR = 9.708, 95% CI = 1.121-76.923, P = .032) were significant risk factors of PJF development. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cutoff value for the LDI was calculated as 61.0% (area under the curve = 0.790, P < .001).
PJF developed in a considerable portion of patients despite optimal correction relative to the age-adjusted alignment. The risk factors of PJF in this patient group were high body mass index, high LDI exceeding 61%, and no use of hook fixation. PJF could be further decreased by properly managing these risk factors along with optimal sagittal correction.
相对于年龄调整后的矢状面排列目标进行适当矫正可降低近端交界性失败(PJF)风险。尽管如此,仍有相当数量的患者尽管进行了最佳矫正仍发生PJF。本研究的目的是确定在成人脊柱畸形手术中,尽管相对于矢状面年龄调整评分(SAAS)进行了最佳矫正,但仍发生PJF的危险因素。
最初筛选年龄在60岁及以上、患有成人脊柱畸形且接受了≥5节段至骶骨融合术的患者。其中,仅将相对于SAAS实现最佳矢状面矫正的患者纳入研究。最佳矫正定义为SAAS点在-1至+1之间。比较PJF组和无PJF组之间的各种临床和影像学因素,并使用多变量分析进行进一步评估。
最终研究队列包括127例患者。平均年龄为67岁,女性111例(87.4%)。平均总融合长度为7.2。42例患者(33.1%)发生PJF,而85例患者(66.9%)未发生PJF。多变量分析显示,高体重指数(优势比[OR]=1.153,95%置信区间[CI]=1.027-1.295,P=.016)、较高的前凸分布指数(LDI)(OR=1.024,95%CI=1.003-1.045,P=.022)以及未使用钩状固定(OR=9.708,95%CI=1.121-76.923,P=.032)是PJF发生的显著危险因素。在受试者工作特征曲线分析中,LDI的截断值计算为61.0%(曲线下面积=0.790,P<.001)。
尽管相对于年龄调整后的排列进行了最佳矫正,但仍有相当一部分患者发生PJF。该患者组中PJF的危险因素为高体重指数、LDI超过61%以及未使用钩状固定。通过适当管理这些危险因素以及进行最佳矢状面矫正,可进一步降低PJF的发生率。