Department of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology Xuanwu Hospital, China International Neuroscience Institute, Capital Medical University, National Center for Neurological Disorders Beijing China.
Department of Interventional Radiology The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University Nanjing Jiangsu China.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jul 2;13(13):e034056. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.034056. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
The authors aimed to elucidate the relationship between latest ischemic event and the incidence of subsequent ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic artery occlusion.
We analyzed the association between qualifying event-the latest ischemic event (transient ischemic attack [TIA] or stroke)-and the incidence of ipsilateral ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic artery occlusion treated with medical therapy alone in CMOSS (Carotid or Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Surgery Study). The incidence of CMOSS primary outcomes, including any stroke or death within 30 days after randomization or ipsilateral ischemic stroke between 30 days and 2 years, between the bypass surgical and medical groups, stratified by qualifying events, was also compared. Of the 165 patients treated with medical therapy alone, 75 had a TIA and 90 had a stroke as their qualifying event. The incidence of ipsilateral ischemic stroke did not significantly differ between patients with a TIA and those with a stroke as their qualifying event (13.3% versus 6.7%, =0.17). In multivariate analysis, the qualifying event was not associated with the incidence of ipsilateral ischemic stroke. There were no significant differences in the CMOSS primary outcomes between the surgical and medical groups, regardless of the qualifying event being TIA (10.1% versus 12.2%, =0.86) or stroke (6.7% versus 8.9%, =0.55).
Among patients with symptomatic artery occlusion and hemodynamic insufficiency, the risk of subsequent ipsilateral ischemic stroke does not appear to be lower in patients presenting with a TIA compared with those with a stroke.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01758614.
作者旨在阐明症状性动脉闭塞患者最新缺血事件与随后发生缺血性卒中的关系。
我们分析了 CMOSS(颈内或大脑中动脉闭塞手术研究)中单独接受药物治疗的症状性动脉闭塞患者 qualifying event(最近的缺血事件[短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或卒中])与同侧缺血性卒中发生率之间的关系。还比较了 qualifying event 分层后的旁路手术组和药物组之间 CMOSS 主要结局(随机分组后 30 天内任何卒中和死亡或 30 天至 2 年内同侧缺血性卒中)的发生率。在单独接受药物治疗的 165 例患者中,75 例有 TIA,90 例有卒中作为 qualifying event。有 TIA 和有卒中作为 qualifying event 的患者同侧缺血性卒中的发生率没有显著差异(13.3%比 6.7%,=0.17)。多变量分析显示, qualifying event 与同侧缺血性卒中的发生率无关。无论 qualifying event 是 TIA(10.1%比 12.2%,=0.86)还是卒中(6.7%比 8.9%,=0.55),手术组和药物组的 CMOSS 主要结局均无显著差异。
在有症状性动脉闭塞和血液动力学不足的患者中,与有卒中的患者相比,表现为 TIA 的患者随后同侧缺血性卒中的风险似乎并没有降低。