Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Pulmonary Surgery, Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 1;66(1). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae250.
Thoracoscopic segmentectomy is the recommended treatment option for small peripheral pulmonary nodules. To assess the ability of preoperative three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction computed tomography (CT) to shorten the operative time and improve perioperative outcomes in thoracoscopic segmentectomy compared with standard chest CT, we conducted this randomized controlled trial.
The DRIVATS study was a multicentre, randomized controlled trial conducted in 3 hospitals between July 2019 and November 2023. Patients with small peripheral pulmonary nodules not reaching segment borders were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 3D reconstruction CT or standard chest CT before thoracoscopic segmentectomy. The primary end-point was operative time. The secondary end-points included incidence of postoperative complications, intraoperative blood loss and operative accident event.
A total of 191 patients were enrolled in this study: 95 in the 3D reconstruction CT group and 96 in the standard chest CT group. All patients underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy except for 1 patient in the standard chest CT group who received a wedge resection. There is no significant difference in operative time between the 3D reconstruction CT group (median, 100 min [interquartile range (IQR), 85-120]) and the standard chest CT group (median, 100 min [IQR, 81-140]) (P = 0.82). Only 1 intraoperative complication occurred in the standard chest CT group. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative complications between the 2 groups (P = 0.52). Other perioperative outcomes were also similar.
In patients with small peripheral pulmonary nodules not reaching segment borders, the use of 3D reconstruction CT in thoracoscopic segmentectomy was feasible, but it did not result in significant differences in operative time or perioperative outcomes compared to standard chest CT.
胸腔镜解剖性肺段切除术是治疗小外周肺结节的推荐治疗选择。为了评估术前三维(3D)重建 CT 与标准胸部 CT 相比,在胸腔镜解剖性肺段切除术中缩短手术时间和改善围手术期结局的能力,我们进行了这项随机对照试验。
DRIVATS 研究是一项在 3 家医院于 2019 年 7 月至 2023 年 11 月进行的多中心、随机对照试验。将未到达段边界的小外周肺结节患者随机分为 1:1 比例的 3D 重建 CT 组和标准胸部 CT 组,分别在胸腔镜解剖性肺段切除术前接受 3D 重建 CT 或标准胸部 CT。主要终点是手术时间。次要终点包括术后并发症发生率、术中出血量和手术意外事件。
本研究共纳入 191 例患者:3D 重建 CT 组 95 例,标准胸部 CT 组 96 例。除标准胸部 CT 组 1 例患者行楔形切除术外,所有患者均行胸腔镜解剖性肺段切除术。3D 重建 CT 组(中位数 100min [四分位距 85-120])与标准胸部 CT 组(中位数 100min [四分位距 81-140])的手术时间无显著差异(P=0.82)。标准胸部 CT 组仅发生 1 例术中并发症。两组术后并发症发生率无显著差异(P=0.52)。其他围手术期结局也相似。
对于未到达段边界的小外周肺结节患者,胸腔镜解剖性肺段切除术中使用 3D 重建 CT 是可行的,但与标准胸部 CT 相比,在手术时间或围手术期结局方面没有显著差异。