Heitzinger Gregor, Spinka Georg, Prausmüller Suriya, Pavo Noemi, Dannenberg Varius, Donà Carolina, Koschutnik Matthias, Kammerlander Andreas, Nitsche Christian, Arfsten Henrike, Kastl Stefan, Strunk Guido, Hülsmann Martin, Rosenhek Raphael, Hengstenberg Christian, Bartko Philipp E, Goliasch Georg
Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Complexity Research, Vienna, Austria.
JACC Adv. 2022 Aug 26;1(3):100063. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100063. eCollection 2022 Aug.
Secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) in the setting of heart failure (HF) has considerable impact on quality of life, HF rehospitalizations, and mortality. Identification of high-risk cohorts is essential to understand disease trajectories and for risk stratification.
This study aimed to provide a structured decision tree-like approach to risk stratification in patients with severe sMR and HF.
This observational study included 1,317 patients with severe sMR from the entire HF spectrum. Clinical, echocardiographic, and laboratory data were extracted for all patients. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Survival tree analysis, a supervised learning technique, was applied to identify patient subgroups at risk of mortality and further stratified by HF subtype (preserved, mildly reduced, and reduced ejection fraction).
Using supervised learning (survival tree method), 8 distinct subgroups were identified that differed significantly in long-term survival. Subgroup 7, characterized by younger age (≤66 years), higher hemoglobin (>12.7 g/dL), and higher albumin levels (>40.6 g/L) had the best survival. In contrast, subgroup 5 displayed a 20-fold risk of mortality (hazard ratio: 20.38 [95% CI: 10.78-38.52]); < 0.001 and had older age (>68 years), low serum albumin (≤40.6 g/L), and higher NT-proBNP levels (≥9,750 pg/mL). Unique subgroups were further identified for each type of HF subtypes.
Supervised machine learning reveals heterogeneity in the sMR risk spectrum, highlighting the clinical variability in the population. A decision tree-like model can help identify differences in outcomes among subgroups and can help provide tailored risk stratification.
心力衰竭(HF)背景下的继发性二尖瓣反流(sMR)对生活质量、HF再住院率和死亡率有相当大的影响。识别高危队列对于了解疾病轨迹和风险分层至关重要。
本研究旨在为重度sMR和HF患者提供一种结构化的类似决策树的风险分层方法。
这项观察性研究纳入了1317例来自整个HF谱的重度sMR患者。提取了所有患者的临床、超声心动图和实验室数据。主要终点是全因死亡率。采用生存树分析这一监督学习技术来识别有死亡风险的患者亚组,并根据HF亚型(保留、轻度降低和降低的射血分数)进一步分层。
使用监督学习(生存树方法),识别出8个不同的亚组,其长期生存率有显著差异。亚组7的特征为年龄较小(≤66岁)、血红蛋白较高(>12.7 g/dL)和白蛋白水平较高(>40.6 g/L),生存率最佳。相比之下,亚组5的死亡风险高出约20倍(风险比:20.38 [95% CI:10.78 - 38.52]);P < 0.001,其年龄较大(>68岁)、血清白蛋白较低(≤40.6 g/L)和NT-proBNP水平较高(≥9750 pg/mL)。还为每种HF亚型进一步识别出了独特的亚组。
监督式机器学习揭示了sMR风险谱中的异质性,突出了人群中的临床变异性。类似决策树的模型有助于识别亚组间结局的差异,并有助于提供针对性的风险分层。