Department of Pediatrics, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2024 Sep;11(9):1065-1071. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.14150. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
Since the COVID-19 pandemic, movement disorder clinics have seen an increase in patients with an unusual type of tic-like symptoms: young adults with abrupt onset complex behaviors. It was quickly suspected that these patients suffered from functional neurological symptoms, later named Functional Tic-Like Behaviors (FTLB). Subsequent research on the differential diagnosis between FTLB and tics has been substantial and led to the development of diagnostic checklists.
We conducted a theoretical reappraisal of the FTLB literature to clarify the validity of the concept and its diagnostic implications.
This paper addresses several key aspects of the current FTLB literature: circular reasoning, the complications of the FTLB phenomenology and demographics, the impact of FTLB on tic literature at large, and issues with alignment of the FTLB concept with the diagnostic criteria for functional disorders.
The clinical approach to FTLB might involve circular reasoning due to a lack of clinical benchmarks. The FTLB phenomenology and demographics may need more work to ensure a lack of bias and a proper description of this patient group including a clear distinction from tics. The impact of the FTLB discussion on the wider literature needs consideration. The validation of positive signs may help with both these endeavors and pave way to the inclusion of FTLB within psychiatric classification systems. Furthermore, the coexistence of FTLB and tics within the same patient needs to be addressed.
More research may be needed to fully establish the diagnosis of FTLB and differentiate it from tics.
自 COVID-19 大流行以来,运动障碍诊所看到了患有一种不寻常类型抽动样症状的患者增加:突然出现复杂行为的年轻成年人。人们很快怀疑这些患者患有功能性神经症状,后来被命名为功能性抽动样行为(FTLB)。随后对 FTLB 与抽动的鉴别诊断进行了大量研究,并制定了诊断清单。
我们对 FTLB 文献进行了理论重新评估,以阐明该概念的有效性及其诊断意义。
本文解决了当前 FTLB 文献的几个关键方面:循环推理、FTLB 现象学和人口统计学的复杂性、FTLB 对抽动文献的影响,以及 FTLB 概念与功能性障碍诊断标准之间的一致性问题。
由于缺乏临床基准,FTLB 的临床方法可能涉及循环推理。FTLB 的现象学和人口统计学可能需要更多的工作,以确保没有偏见,并对这一患者群体进行适当的描述,包括与抽动的明确区分。需要考虑 FTLB 讨论对更广泛文献的影响。阳性体征的验证可能有助于这两项努力,并为将 FTLB 纳入精神科分类系统铺平道路。此外,需要解决同一患者中 FTLB 和抽动共存的问题。
可能需要进一步研究,以充分确立 FTLB 的诊断,并将其与抽动区分开来。