Kakpovbia Efe E, Young Trevor, Milam Emily C, Qian Yingzhi, Yassin Sallie, Nicholson Joey, Hu Jiyuan, Troxel Andrea B, Nagler Arielle R
The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025 Apr;39(4):775-784. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20154. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
Acne is a common skin condition, but little data exist on the comparative efficacy of topical acne therapies. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of topical therapies for mild-to-moderate acne. Searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL via Ovid, Embase via Ovid and Web of Science were conducted on 29 November 2021. Randomized controlled trials examining ≥12 weeks of topical treatments for acne vulgaris in subjects aged 12 and older were included. Main outcomes were absolute or percent change in acne lesion count and treatment success on the Investigator's Global Assessment scale. Thirty-five randomized clinical trials with 33,472 participants comparing nine different topical agents were included. Adapalene-benzoyl peroxide (BPO), clindamycin-BPO and clindamycin-tretinoin demonstrated the greatest reduction in non-inflammatory (ratio of means [RoM] 1.76; 95% CI [1.46; 2.12], RoM 1.70; 95% CI [1.44; 2.02] and RoM 1.87; 95% CI [1.53; 2.30], respectively), inflammatory (RoM 1.56; 95% CI [1.44; 1.70], RoM 1.49; 95% CI [1.39; 1.60] and RoM 1.48; 95% CI [1.36; 1.61], respectively) and total lesion count (ROM 1.67; 95% CI [1.47; 1.90], RoM 1.59; 95% CI [1.42; 1.79] and RoM 1.64; 95% CI [1.42; 1.89], respectively) compared to placebo. All single agents outperformed placebo except tazarotene, which did not significantly outperform placebo for inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion count reduction. Most combination agents significantly outperformed their individual components in lesion count reduction and global assessment scores, except for clindamycin-tretinoin and clindamycin-BPO, which did not significantly outperform tretinoin (RoM 1.13; 95% CI [0.94; 1.36]) and BPO (RoM = 1.15, 95% CI [0.98; 1.36]), respectively, for non-inflammatory lesion reduction. There was no significant difference amongst most single agents when evaluating lesion count reduction. Combination agents are generally most effective for mild-to-moderate acne; however for non-inflammatory acne, the addition of clindamycin in topical regimens is unnecessary and should be avoided.
痤疮是一种常见的皮肤疾病,但关于局部痤疮治疗方法的比较疗效的数据却很少。我们进行了一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析,以评估局部治疗轻至中度痤疮的疗效。于2021年11月29日在PubMed/MEDLINE、通过Ovid检索的Cochrane CENTRAL、通过Ovid检索的Embase以及Web of Science中进行了检索。纳入了对12岁及以上寻常痤疮患者进行≥12周局部治疗的随机对照试验。主要结局为痤疮皮损计数的绝对变化或百分比变化以及研究者整体评估量表上的治疗成功情况。纳入了35项随机临床试验,共33472名参与者,比较了9种不同的局部用药。与安慰剂相比,阿达帕林-过氧化苯甲酰(BPO)、克林霉素-BPO和克林霉素-维甲酸在非炎性皮损(平均比值[RoM]分别为1.76;95%可信区间[1.46;2.12]、RoM 1.70;95%可信区间[1.44;2.02]和RoM 1.87;95%可信区间[1.53;2.30])、炎性皮损(RoM分别为1.56;95%可信区间[1.44;1.70]、RoM 1.49;95%可信区间[1.39;1.60]和RoM 1.48;95%可信区间[1.36;1.61])以及总皮损计数(RoM分别为1.67;95%可信区间[1.47;1.90]、RoM 1.59;95%可信区间[1.42;1.79]和RoM 1.64;95%可信区间[1.42;1.89])方面显示出最大程度的减少。除了他扎罗汀在减少炎性和非炎性皮损计数方面未显著优于安慰剂外,所有单一药物均优于安慰剂。在减少皮损计数方面,大多数复方制剂显著优于其单个成分以及整体评估得分,但克林霉素-维甲酸和克林霉素-BPO在减少非炎性皮损方面分别未显著优于维甲酸(RoM 1.13;95%可信区间[0.94;1.36])和BPO(RoM = 1.15,95%可信区间[0.98;1.36])。在评估皮损计数减少情况时,大多数单一药物之间没有显著差异。复方制剂通常对轻至中度痤疮最有效;然而对于非炎性痤疮,在局部治疗方案中添加克林霉素是不必要的,应予以避免。