Feasibility and Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrastaging in the Detection of Micrometastases in Sentinel and Non-sentinel Lymph Nodes in Cervical Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study With a Five-Year Follow-Up Period.

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cause of malignant tumor-related deaths among women in developing nations. Cervical cancer has been estimated to cause 527.600 new cases and 265.700 deaths globally per year.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate patients with cervical cancer by ultrastaging all the lymph nodes (LN), sentinel LN (SLN) and non-SLN, to increase the sensitivity of the detection of LN metastases and the diagnostic accuracy in cervical cancer with a five-year follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 14 cervical cancer cases from 2017 to 2019 at the Municipal Emergency Clinical Hospital of Timisoara, Romania. The cases were selected based on their high risk of LN involvement but negative intraoperative pathologic LN. After re-evaluating all paraffin block biopsy samples from 29 cases, 14 cases were included in the study, which met all criteria for ultrastaging on surgical biopsy samples.

RESULTS

Patients' ages included in the study ranged from 43 to 70 years (median: 57.14 years). According to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging, the majority of the patients were in stage IB: seven cases (50%). The study revealed a positive correlation between patient age and FIGO staging, with Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.707 and a p-value of less than 0.05, indicating that older patients were more likely to be diagnosed with a higher FIGO stage. The mean follow-up was 34.5 months, and the median follow-up was 36 months (range: 6-60 months). We obtained 167 nodes, with a mean of 11.92 nodes/case. Twenty-one LN were found to be positive with the ultrastaging method. We detected 11 LN with macrometastases (MAC) (52.38%), seven with micrometastasis (MIC) (33.3%), and three with tumor cell islets (14.4%). That would be 13% of newly diagnosed ultrastaging cases as positive nodes. This ultrastaging method detected nodal MIC in eight (57.1%) out of the 14 patients, who initially tested negative for LN involvement using the routine Hematoxylin and Eosin (HE) method. The detection of micrometastases in these patients underscored the superior sensitivity of ultrastaging, which was further highlighted by the subsequent relapse of four (28.57%) out of these eight patients. The study also found no correlation between the FIGO standardization and the number of MIC found in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Predicting cervical LN metastasis (LNM) is crucial for improving survival rates and reducing recurrence. Very few small cohort studies used an ultrastaging method to assess non-SLNs; most of them only assessed SLNs. We showed in our study that the ultrastaging method, both in the case of SLN and non-SLN, is superior compared with H&E analysis, with a 13% rate of new positive nodule diagnosis. Metastatic involvement of non-SLN was found in over 50% of all cases (8/14) according to the ultrastaging method. Additionally, our study confirms that the sensitivity of SLN ultrastaging is high for the presence of both MIC and MAC in SLN pelvic LN. As a result, we feel that ultrastaging is the most effective method for SLN analysis in patients with early-stage cervical cancer, and bilateral detection is preferable, significantly reducing false-negative results. The routine use of SLN along with ultrastaging would lead to more accurate surgical staging and better oncological follow-up of cases.