Punnoose Deepu Jacob, Varghese Jacob, Theruvil Bipin, Thomas Appu Benny
Department of Orthopaedics, VPS Lakeshore Hospital, Kochi, 682040 Kerala India.
Indian J Orthop. 2024 May 23;58(7):979-986. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01185-5. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Recently the peroneus longus tendon (PLT) gained popularity in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and has been utilized with satisfactory outcomes. However, there are concerns regarding donor site morbidity. This study aims to compare the functional outcome of ACL reconstruction using hamstring (HT) and PLT autografts and evaluate the donor site morbidity.
Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were allocated to two groups (HT and PLT). Graft diameter was measured intraoperatively. Knee functional outcome was evaluated with IKDC and Tegner-Lysholm scores preoperatively, and postoperatively after 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Donor site morbidities were assessed with thigh circumference measurements, subjective evaluation of sensory disturbances, and ankle scoring with AOFAS and FADI scores.
At 1-year follow-up, the PLT group showed comparable IKDC ( = 0.925) and Tegner-Lysholm ( = 0.600) scores with those of the HT group. The mean graft diameter in the PLT group (7.93 ± 0.52 mm) was larger compared with the HT group (7.43 ± 0.50 mm) ( < 0.001). The incidence of thigh atrophy (HT-16.7%, PLT-10%) and sensory disturbances (HT-73.3%, PLT-10%) was greater in the HT group. There was no significant ankle donor site morbidity in the PLT group (AOFAS-98.67 ± 3.45, FADI-99.23 ± 1.69).
ACL reconstruction with PLT had comparable functional outcome with that of HT at 1 year. However, PLT demonstrated larger graft diameter, less donor site morbidity, and enhanced muscle recovery without significantly affecting the ankle function. PLT can be safely used as an acceptable alternative graft choice harvested from outside the knee for ACL reconstruction.
最近,腓骨长肌腱(PLT)在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中受到欢迎,并已被应用且取得了满意的效果。然而,人们对供区并发症存在担忧。本研究旨在比较使用腘绳肌(HT)和PLT自体移植物进行ACL重建的功能结果,并评估供区并发症。
接受ACL重建的患者被分为两组(HT组和PLT组)。术中测量移植物直径。术前以及术后3个月、6个月和1年时,使用国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)和Tegner-Lysholm评分评估膝关节功能结果。通过测量大腿围、主观评估感觉障碍以及使用美国足与踝关节协会(AOFAS)和芬兰踝关节功能障碍指数(FADI)评分对踝关节进行评分来评估供区并发症。
在1年随访时,PLT组的IKDC(=0.925)和Tegner-Lysholm(=0.600)评分与HT组相当。PLT组的平均移植物直径(7.93±0.52mm)比HT组(7.43±0.50mm)大(<0.001)。HT组的大腿萎缩发生率(HT组为16.7%,PLT组为10%)和感觉障碍发生率(HT组为73.3%,PLT组为10%)更高。PLT组的踝关节供区无明显并发症(AOFAS评分-98.67±3.45,FADI评分-99.23±1.69)。
使用PLT进行ACL重建在1年时的功能结果与HT相当。然而,PLT显示出更大的移植物直径、更少的供区并发症以及更好的肌肉恢复,且未显著影响踝关节功能。PLT可作为从膝关节外获取的可接受的替代移植物选择安全地用于ACL重建。