Suppr超能文献

葡萄牙开放式腹股沟疝修补术中手术技术与慢性术后腹股沟痛:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。

Surgical Technique and Chronic Postoperative Inguinal Pain in Patients Undergoing Open Inguinal Hernioplasty in Portugal: A Prospective Multicentric Cohort Study.

出版信息

Acta Med Port. 2024 Jul 1;37(7-8):507-517. doi: 10.20344/amp.20277.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Evidence about the advantage of Lichtenstein's repair, the guidelines' recommended technique, is scarce regarding postoperative chronic inguinal pain (CPIP). The primary aim of this study was to compare CPIP in patients undergoing Lichtenstein versus other techniques.

METHODS

Prospective multicentric cohort study including consecutive adults undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair in Portuguese hospitals (October - December 2019). Laparoscopic and mesh-free hernia repairs were excluded. The primary outcome was postoperative pain at three months, defined as a score of ≥ 3/10 in the European Hernia Society Quality of Life score pain domain. The secondary outcome was 30-day postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and sixty-nine patients from 33 hospitals were included. Most were men (90.4%) and had unilateral hernias (88.6%). Overall, 53.6% (466/869) underwent Lichtenstein's repair, and 46.4% (403/869) were treated with other techniques, of which 83.9% (338/403) were plug and patch. The overall rate of CPIP was 16.6% and 12.2% of patients had surgical complications. The unadjusted risk was similar for CPIP (OR 0.76, p = 0.166, CI 0.51 - 1.12) and postoperative complications (OR 1.06, p = 0.801, CI 0.69 - 1.60) between Lichtenstein and other techniques. After adjustment, the risk was also similar for CPIP (OR 0.83, p = 0.455, CI 0.51 - 1.34) and postoperative complications (OR 1.14, p = 0.584, CI 0.71 - 1.84).

CONCLUSION

The Lichtenstein technique was not associated with lower CPIP and showed comparable surgical complications. Further investigation as- sessing long term outcomes is necessary to fully assess the benefits of the Lichtenstein technique regarding CPIP.

摘要

引言

关于术后慢性腹股沟疼痛(CPIP),Lichtenstein 修补术(指南推荐的技术)的优势证据很少。本研究的主要目的是比较行 Lichtenstein 修补术与其他技术的 CPIP。

方法

前瞻性多中心队列研究,纳入葡萄牙医院择期行腹股沟疝修补术的成年患者(2019 年 10 月至 12 月)。排除腹腔镜和无网片疝修补术。主要结局为术后 3 个月时的疼痛,定义为欧洲疝学会生活质量评分疼痛域的评分≥3/10。次要结局为术后 30 天并发症。

结果

33 家医院的 869 名患者入组。大多数为男性(90.4%),单侧疝(88.6%)。总体而言,53.6%(466/869)行 Lichtenstein 修补术,46.4%(403/869)采用其他技术,其中 83.9%(338/403)为Plug-and-Patch。CPIP 的总体发生率为 16.6%,12.2%的患者发生手术并发症。Lichtenstein 组和其他技术组的 CPIP(OR 0.76,p=0.166,CI 0.51-1.12)和术后并发症(OR 1.06,p=0.801,CI 0.69-1.60)的未调整风险相似。调整后,CPIP(OR 0.83,p=0.455,CI 0.51-1.34)和术后并发症(OR 1.14,p=0.584,CI 0.71-1.84)的风险也相似。

结论

Lichtenstein 技术与较低的 CPIP 发生率无关,且手术并发症发生率相似。需要进一步评估长期结果,以充分评估 Lichtenstein 技术在 CPIP 方面的获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验