Faculty of Nursing, El Bosque University, Bogotá, DC, Colombia.
Palliative care program, La Sabana University, Bogotá, DC, Colombia.
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jul 1;23(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01427-1.
National palliative care plans depend upon stakeholder engagement to succeed. Assessing the capability, interest, and knowledge of stakeholders is a crucial step in the implementation of public health initiatives, as recommended by the World Health Organisation. However, utilising stakeholder analysis is a strategy underused in public palliative care.
To conduct a stakeholder analysis characterising a diverse group of stakeholders involved in implementing a national palliative care plan in three rural regions of an upper-middle-income country.
A descriptive cross-sectional study design, complemented by a quantitative stakeholder analysis approach, was executed through a survey designed to gauge stakeholders' levels of interest and capability in relation to five fundamental dimensions of public palliative care: provision of services, accessibility of essential medicines, palliative care education, financial support, and palliative care vitality. Stakeholders were categorised as promoters (high-power, high-interest), latent (high-power, low-interest), advocates (low-power, high-interest), and indifferent (low-power and low-interest). Stakeholder self-perceived category and knowledge level were also assessed.
Among the 65 surveyed stakeholders, 19 were categorised as promoters, 34 as advocates, 9 as latent, and 3 as indifferent. Stakeholders' self-perception of their category did not align with the results of the quantitative analysis. When evaluated by region and palliative care dimensions the distribution of stakeholders was nonuniform. Palliative care funding was the dimension with the highest number of stakeholders categorised as indifferent, and the lowest percentage of promoters. Stakeholders categorised as promoters consistently reported a low level of knowledge, regardless of the dimension, region, or their level of interest.
Assessing the capability, interest, and knowledge of stakeholders is a crucial step when implementing public health initiatives in palliative care. It allows for a data-driven decision-making process on how to delegate responsibilities, administer financial resources, and establish governance boards that remain engaged and work efficiently.
国家姑息治疗计划的成功依赖于利益相关者的参与。世界卫生组织建议,评估利益相关者的能力、兴趣和知识是实施公共卫生倡议的关键步骤。然而,在公共姑息治疗中,利益相关者分析是一种未被充分利用的策略。
对参与实施中上收入国家三个农村地区国家姑息治疗计划的多元化利益相关者进行利益相关者分析。
采用描述性横断面研究设计,并辅以定量利益相关者分析方法,通过一项调查来衡量利益相关者在公共姑息治疗的五个基本方面(服务提供、基本药物可及性、姑息治疗教育、财政支持和姑息治疗活力)的兴趣和能力水平。根据权力和兴趣两个维度将利益相关者分为推动者(高权力、高兴趣)、潜在者(高权力、低兴趣)、倡导者(低权力、高兴趣)和冷漠者(低权力、低兴趣)。还评估了利益相关者的自我感知类别和知识水平。
在接受调查的 65 名利益相关者中,19 人被归类为推动者,34 人被归类为倡导者,9 人被归类为潜在者,3 人被归类为冷漠者。利益相关者对自己类别的感知与定量分析结果不一致。按区域和姑息治疗维度评估,利益相关者的分布不均匀。姑息治疗资金是被归类为冷漠者最多的维度,也是推动者比例最低的维度。无论维度、区域或兴趣水平如何,被归类为推动者的利益相关者始终报告知识水平较低。
在姑息治疗中实施公共卫生倡议时,评估利益相关者的能力、兴趣和知识是一个关键步骤。这可以为如何分配责任、管理财政资源以及建立保持参与和高效运作的治理委员会提供数据驱动的决策过程。