Clinical features of hand, foot and mouth disease caused by Coxsackievirus A6 in Xi'an, China, 2013-2019: A multicenter observational study.

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical features of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) caused by coxsackievirus A6 (CVA6) and this work may help early diagnose of atypical HFMD.

METHODS

From January 2013 to December 2019, a total of 7,208 patients with a clinical diagnosis of HFMD in Xi'an Children's Hospital, Xi'an Central Hospital, and Xi'an Jiaotong University Second Affiliated Hospital, were included in this observational study. The clinical data, specimens and follow-up results were collected. Real-time RT‒PCR was performed for the detection and typing of enterovirus nucleic acids.

RESULTS

Of the 7,208 clinically diagnosed HFMD patients, 5,622 were positive for enterovirus nucleic acids, and the positive proportions of CVA6, enterovirus 71 (EV-A71), coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16), and other enteroviruses were 31.0% (1,742/5,622), 27.0% (1,518/5,622), 35.0% (1,968/5,622), and 7.0% (394/5,622), respectively. Based on the etiology, patients were divided into CVA6 group, EV-A71group, and CVA16 group. The mean age at onset was significantly higher in the CVA6 group (4.62±2.13 years) than in the EV-A71 group and CVA16 group (3.45±2.25 years and 3.35±2.13 years, respectively; both P < 0.05). The male/female ratio was 1.45 (1,031/711) in the CVA6 group and was not significantly different from the other two groups. The incidence of fever was significantly higher in the CVA6 group [82.5% (1,437/1,742)] than in the EV-A71 group [51.3% (779/1,518)] and the CVA16 group [45.9% (903/1,968)] (P < 0.05). In the CVA6 group, the rashes were more frequently on the trunk and elbows/knees and were significantly different from the other two groups (P < 0.05). The number of patients with two or more rash morphologies was significantly higher in the CVA6 group than in the other two groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of bullous rash in the CVA6 group [20.2%; n = 352] was higher than in the EV-A71 group [0.33%; n = 5] and CVA16 group [0.66%; n = 13] (P < 0.05). The incidence of neurological complications was significantly higher in the EV-A71 group [52.1% (791/1,518)] than in the CVA16 group [5.1% (100/1,968)] and the CVA6 group [0.8% (14/1,742)] (P < 0.05). In the follow-up period, 160 patients (9.2%) with CVA6 HFMD experienced onychomadesis, but no onychomadesis was observed in the EV-A71 and CVA16 groups. The average WBC count was significantly higher in the CVA6 group than in the CVA16 group (P < 0.05). The number of patients with increased CRP was significantly larger in the CVA6 group than in the CVA16 group but was significantly smaller than that in the EV-A71 group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CVA6 has become one of the main pathogens of HFMD in the Xi'an area during 2013-2019. The main clinical manifestations were slightly different from those of HFMD caused by EV-A71 or CVA16, with a higher frequency of fever, diverse morphologies and diffuse distribution of rashes, fewer neurological complications and some onychomadesis.