Suppr超能文献

人工关节周围感染的当前诊断方法概述。

An overview of the current diagnostic approach to Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

作者信息

Al-Jabri Talal, Ridha Mohamed, Wood Matthew J, Kayani Babar, Jayadev Chethan, McCulloch Robert Allan, Schemitsch Emil

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer Imperial College London.

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital.

出版信息

Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024 Jun 30;16:120308. doi: 10.52965/001c.120308. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) presents a formidable challenge to orthopaedic surgeons due to its complex and diverse manifestations. Accurate diagnosis is of utmost importance, as even mild pain following joint replacement surgery may indicate PJI in the absence of a definitive gold standard diagnostic test. Numerous diagnostic modalities have been suggested in the literature, and international societies have continually updated diagnostic criteria for this debilitating complication. This review article aims to comprehensively examine the latest evidence-based approaches for diagnosing PJI. Through a thorough analysis of current literature, we explore promising diagnostic strategies that have demonstrated effectiveness in identifying PJI. These strategies encompass the utilization of laboratory markers, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), alongside imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and leukocyte scintigraphy. Additionally, we highlight the importance of synovial fluid analysis, including the potential role of alpha-defensin as a biomarker, and examine evolving international diagnostic criteria to standardize and improve diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

由于假体周围关节感染(PJI)的表现复杂多样,其诊断对骨科医生而言是一项艰巨的挑战。准确诊断至关重要,因为即使在缺乏明确的金标准诊断测试的情况下,关节置换术后哪怕是轻微疼痛也可能提示PJI。文献中已提出众多诊断方法,并且国际学会不断更新针对这种使人衰弱的并发症的诊断标准。这篇综述文章旨在全面研究诊断PJI的最新循证方法。通过对当前文献的深入分析,我们探索了在识别PJI方面已显示出有效性的有前景的诊断策略。这些策略包括利用实验室指标,如红细胞沉降率(ESR)和C反应蛋白(CRP),以及成像技术,如磁共振成像(MRI)和白细胞闪烁扫描。此外,我们强调了滑液分析的重要性,包括α-防御素作为生物标志物的潜在作用,并研究不断演变的国际诊断标准,以规范和提高诊断准确性。

相似文献

1
An overview of the current diagnostic approach to Periprosthetic Joint Infections.
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024 Jun 30;16:120308. doi: 10.52965/001c.120308. eCollection 2024.
2
The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1309-1314.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
8

引用本文的文献

2
Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection of Hips and Knees-One Size Does Not Fit All.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 28;12(4):ofaf195. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf195. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
A Sarcoma Masquerading as a Pseudotumor After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report.
JBJS Case Connect. 2023 Dec 14;13(4). doi: e23.00275. eCollection 2023 Oct 1.
3
Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Mar;39(3):831-838. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.067. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
4
An artificial intelligence framework for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection based on Tc-MDP dynamic bone scintigraphy.
Eur Radiol. 2023 Oct;33(10):6794-6803. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09687-w. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
5
Utility of D-dimer in total joint arthroplasty.
World J Orthop. 2023 Mar 18;14(3):90-102. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i3.90.
7
Role of Biomarkers in Periprosthetic Joint Infections.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 25;12(12):2958. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122958.
8
D-Dimer, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and C-Reactive Protein Sensitivities for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis.
J Arthroplasty. 2023 May;38(5):914-917. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.010. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
10
Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections : a comparison of infection definitions: EBJIS 2021, ICM 2018, and IDSA 2013.
Bone Joint Res. 2022 Sep;11(9):608-618. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.119.BJR-2022-0078.R1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验