Suppr超能文献

巴西国家卫生系统提供的氯氮平和非氯氮平非典型抗精神病药物对成人精神分裂症患者的比较疗效

Comparative effectiveness of clozapine and non-clozapine atypical antipsychotics provided by the Brazilian National Health System in adults with schizophrenia.

作者信息

Vieira Júlio César Menezes, Reis Edna Afonso, Guerra Augusto Afonso, de Oliveira Helian Nunes, Ruas Cristina Mariano

机构信息

Program in Medications and Pharmaceutical Care - PPGMAF, School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Department of Statistics, Institute of Exact Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 19;15:1421501. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1421501. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Currently, 21 million people live with the disease, mostly in low to middle-income countries. We aimed to assess the survival of patients with schizophrenia using clozapine compared with non-clozapine atypical antipsychotics provided by the Brazilian National Health System using real-world data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is an open retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia to whom atypical antipsychotics were dispensed by the Brazilian National Health System between 2000 and 2015, based on deterministic-probabilistic pairing of administrative data records. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the cumulative probability of survival and the Cox proportional hazards model was adjusted to assess the risk factors for survival via the hazard ratio (HR).

RESULT

Participants were 375,352 adults with schizophrenia, with an overall survival rate of 76.0% (95%CI 75.0-76.0) at the end of the cohort. Multivariate analysis indicated a greater risk of death for men (HR=1.30; 95%CI 1.27-1.32), older adults (HR=17.05; 95%CI 16.52-17.60), and in the Southeast region of Brazil (HR=1.20; 95%CI 1.17-1.23). Patients who used non-clozapine atypical antipsychotics had a 21% greater risk of death when compared to those taking clozapine (HR=1.21; 95%CI 1.14-1.29). Additionally, a history of hospitalization for pneumonia (HR=2.17; 95%CI 2.11-2.23) was the main clinical variable associated with increased risk of death, followed by hospitalization for lung cancer (HR=1.82; 95%CI 1.58-2.08), cardiovascular diseases (HR=1.44; 95%CI 1.40-1.49) and any type of neoplasia (HR=1.29; 95%CI 1.19-1.40).

DISCUSSION

This is the first published Brazilian cohort study that evaluated survival in people with schizophrenia, highlighting the impact of atypical antipsychotics. In this real-world analysis, the use of clozapine had a protective effect on survival when compared to olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, and ziprasidone.

摘要

引言

目前,有2100万人患有这种疾病,其中大多数生活在低收入和中等收入国家。我们旨在利用真实世界的数据,评估使用氯氮平的精神分裂症患者与巴西国家卫生系统提供的非氯氮平非典型抗精神病药物相比的生存率。

材料与方法

这是一项开放性回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2000年至2015年间由巴西国家卫生系统配发非典型抗精神病药物的精神分裂症患者,研究基于行政数据记录的确定性-概率配对。采用Kaplan-Meier方法估计生存累积概率,并通过危险比(HR)调整Cox比例风险模型以评估生存的危险因素。

结果

参与者为375352名成年精神分裂症患者,队列结束时总体生存率为76.0%(95%CI 75.0-76.0)。多变量分析表明,男性(HR=1.30;95%CI 1.27-1.32)、老年人(HR=17.05;95%CI 16.52-17.60)以及巴西东南部地区(HR=1.20;95%CI 1.17-1.23)的死亡风险更高。与服用氯氮平的患者相比,使用非氯氮平非典型抗精神病药物的患者死亡风险高21%(HR=1.21;95%CI 1.14-1.29)。此外,肺炎住院史(HR=2.17;95%CI 2.11-2.23)是与死亡风险增加相关的主要临床变量,其次是肺癌住院(HR=1.82;95%CI 1.58-2.08)、心血管疾病(HR=1.44;95%CI 1.40-1.49)和任何类型的肿瘤(HR=1.29;95%CI 1.19-1.40)。

讨论

这是巴西首次发表的评估精神分裂症患者生存率的队列研究,突出了非典型抗精神病药物的影响。在这项真实世界分析中,与奥氮平、利培酮、喹硫平和齐拉西酮相比,氯氮平的使用对生存具有保护作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5373/11220267/168b80151dd8/fpsyt-15-1421501-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验