Yu Tianqi, Yan Ruirui, Xin Xiaoping, Zhang Xiaoying, Yin Guomei
State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-Arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hulun Buir Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Hailar, China.
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jun 19;11:1414096. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1414096. eCollection 2024.
The forage-livestock balance is an important component of natural grassland management, and realizing a balance between the nutrient energy demand of domestic animals and the energy supply of grasslands is the core challenge in forage-livestock management. This study was performed at the Xieertala Ranch in Hulunbuir City, Inner Mongolia. Using the GRAZPLAN and GrazFeed models, we examined the forage-livestock energy balance during different grazing periods and physiological stages of livestock growth under natural grazing conditions. Data on pasture conditions, climatic factors, supplemental feeding, and livestock characteristics, were used to analyze the metabolizable energy (ME), metabolizable energy for maintenance (ME), and total metabolizable energy intake (MEI) of grazing livestock. The results showed that the energy balance between forage and animals differed for adult cows at different physiological stages. In the early lactation period, although the MEI was greater than ME, it did not meet the requirement for ME. MEI was greater than ME during mid-lactation, but there was still an energy imbalance in the early and late lactation periods. In the late lactation period, MEI could meet ME requirements from April-September. Adult gestational lactating cows with or without calves were unable to meet their ME requirement, especially in the dry period, even though MEI was greater than ME. Adult cows at different physiological stages exhibited differences in daily forage intake and rumen microbial crude protein (MCP) metabolism, and the forage intake by nonpregnant cows decreased as follows: early lactation > mid-lactation > late lactation, pregnant cows' lactation > dry period. For the degradation, digestion and synthesis of rumen MCP, early-lactation cows were similar to those in the mid-lactation group, but both were higher than those in the late-lactation group, while pregnant cows had greater degradation, digestion, and synthesis of MCP in the lactation period relative to the dry period. For lactating cows, especially those with calves, grazing energy requirements, methane emission metabolism and heat production were highest in August, with increased energy expenditure in winter. Overall, grazing energy, methane emissions and heat production by dry cows were low. In the context of global climate change and grassland degradation, managers must adopt different strategies according to the physiological stages of livestock to ensure a forage-livestock balance and the sustainable utilization and development of grasslands.
草畜平衡是天然草地管理的重要组成部分,实现家畜营养能量需求与草地能量供给之间的平衡是草畜管理的核心挑战。本研究在内蒙古呼伦贝尔市谢尔塔拉牧场开展。利用GRAZPLAN和GrazFeed模型,我们研究了自然放牧条件下不同放牧时期及家畜生长生理阶段的草畜能量平衡。利用牧场状况、气候因素、补饲及家畜特征数据,分析放牧家畜的可代谢能量(ME)、维持可代谢能量(ME)及总可代谢能量摄入量(MEI)。结果表明,不同生理阶段的成年母牛,其草畜能量平衡存在差异。在泌乳早期,尽管MEI大于ME,但未达到ME需求。泌乳中期MEI大于ME,但泌乳早期和晚期仍存在能量失衡。在泌乳后期,4月至9月MEI可满足ME需求。带犊或不带犊的成年妊娠泌乳母牛无法满足其ME需求,尤其是在干奶期,尽管MEI大于ME。不同生理阶段的成年母牛在日采食量和瘤胃微生物粗蛋白(MCP)代谢方面存在差异,未怀孕母牛的采食量下降顺序为:泌乳早期>泌乳中期>泌乳后期,怀孕母牛的泌乳期>干奶期。对于瘤胃MCP的降解、消化和合成,泌乳早期母牛与泌乳中期组相似,但均高于泌乳后期组,而怀孕母牛在泌乳期相对于干奶期对MCP有更大的降解、消化和合成。对于泌乳母牛,尤其是带犊母牛,8月放牧能量需求、甲烷排放代谢和产热最高,冬季能量消耗增加。总体而言,干奶母牛的放牧能量、甲烷排放和产热较低。在全球气候变化和草地退化的背景下,管理者必须根据家畜的生理阶段采取不同策略,以确保草畜平衡以及草地的可持续利用和发展。