College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Iraq.
Georgian Med News. 2024 Apr(349):103-109.
Aims - to compare the color changes, the surface roughness and morphology of the enamel bleached with two different bleaching solutions (chemical and laser activated), preceded or not with acid etching. Thirty teeth of bovine prepared and haphazardly assigned to 2 groups (n=15) depending on bleaching technique. Each group subdivided to 3 subgroup (n=5) consistent with acid etching by 37% phosphoric acid. Atomic force microscopy and VITA easy shade spectrophotometer were performed twice for all the specimens before and after bleaching. ANOVA, the Paired sample t-test, and the independent sample t-test used for statistical analysis. As for the color changes, the groups that were bleached by the chemical method, the difference among the three subgroups was statistically significant. This also applies to the groups bleached with the laser method. When comparing the results of the chemical bleaching subgroups with the laser bleaching ones, the difference was not significant. Roughness results showed significant differences between certain subgroups and non-significant differences among others. However, the difference was statistically significant between the chemical and laser groups, laser technique resulted in less surface roughness than the chemical one. Acid etching before bleaching produced better colour change in both the chemical and laser assisted bleaching. In chemical bleaching, surface roughness was higher when acid etching was used. This was also true for laser bleaching technique. In general, laser assisted bleaching produced less surface roughness than chemical bleaching.
目的 - 比较两种不同漂白溶液(化学和激光激活)对牙釉质的颜色变化、表面粗糙度和形态的影响,这些溶液是否经过酸蚀预处理。将 30 颗牛牙制备并随机分配到 2 组(n=15),根据漂白技术而定。每组再分为 3 个亚组(n=5),用 37%磷酸进行酸蚀处理。所有标本在漂白前后均进行两次原子力显微镜和 VITA easy shade 分光光度计检测。使用方差分析、配对样本 t 检验和独立样本 t 检验进行统计分析。就颜色变化而言,用化学方法漂白的组中,三个亚组之间的差异具有统计学意义。用激光方法漂白的组也是如此。将化学漂白亚组的结果与激光漂白亚组进行比较,差异无统计学意义。粗糙度结果显示,某些亚组之间存在显著差异,而其他亚组之间无显著差异。然而,化学组和激光组之间的差异具有统计学意义,激光技术比化学技术产生的表面粗糙度更小。在化学和激光辅助漂白中,酸蚀预处理前可产生更好的颜色变化。在化学漂白中,使用酸蚀时表面粗糙度更高。激光漂白技术也是如此。总的来说,激光辅助漂白比化学漂白产生的表面粗糙度更小。