National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Department of Musculoskeletal, Sport & Exercise Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
J Sports Sci. 2024 Jun;42(11):981-992. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2024.2374637. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
The number of runners and the incidence of running-related injuries (RRIs) are on the rise. Real-time biofeedback gait retraining offers a promising approach to RRIs prevention. However, due to the diversity in study designs and reported outcomes, there remains uncertainty regarding the efficacy of different forms of feedback on running gait biomechanics. Three databases: MEDLINE, PUBMED, and SPORTDiscus were searched to identify relevant studies published up to March 2024, yielding 4646 articles for review. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Downs and Black Quality checklist. Primary outcomes, including Peak Tibial Acceleration (PTA), Vertical Average Loading Rate (VALR), and Vertical Instantaneous Loading Rate (VILR), were analysed through meta-analysis. 24 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed in this review.17 used visual biofeedback (VB) while 14 chose auditory biofeedback (AB). The meta-analysis revealed a reduction in loading variables both immediately following the intervention and after extended training, with both visual and auditory feedback. Notably, the decrease in loading variables was more pronounced post-training and VB proved to be more effective than AB. Real-time biofeedback interventions are effective in lowering loading variables associated with RRIs. The impact is more substantial with sustained training, and VB outperforms AB in terms of effectiveness.
跑步者的数量和与跑步相关的损伤(RRIs)的发生率正在上升。实时生物反馈步态再训练为预防 RRIs 提供了一种有前途的方法。然而,由于研究设计和报告结果的多样性,不同形式的反馈对跑步步态生物力学的效果仍然存在不确定性。我们检索了三个数据库:MEDLINE、PUBMED 和 SPORTDiscus,以确定截至 2024 年 3 月发表的相关研究,共检索到 4646 篇文章进行综述。使用 Downs 和 Black 质量检查表评估纳入研究的质量。通过荟萃分析分析主要结局,包括峰值胫骨加速度(PTA)、垂直平均加载率(VALR)和垂直瞬时加载率(VILR)。24 项研究符合纳入标准并在本综述中进行了分析。其中 17 项使用视觉生物反馈(VB),14 项选择听觉生物反馈(AB)。荟萃分析显示,干预后和延长训练后即刻,两种反馈方式都能降低负荷变量。值得注意的是,训练后负荷变量的下降更为明显,VB 比 AB 更有效。实时生物反馈干预措施可有效降低与 RRIs 相关的负荷变量。随着持续训练,其影响更为显著,而 VB 在有效性方面优于 AB。