School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China; PKU-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China; PKU-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China; IDG-McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Prog Neurobiol. 2024 Sep;240:102655. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2024.102655. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
Object recognition often involves the brain segregating objects from their surroundings. Neurophysiological studies of figure-ground texture segregation have yielded inconsistent results, particularly on whether V1 neurons can perform figure-ground texture segregation or just detect texture borders. To address this issue from a population perspective, we utilized two-photon calcium imaging to simultaneously record the responses of large samples of V1 and V4 neurons to figure-ground texture stimuli in awake, fixating macaques. The average response changes indicate that V1 neurons mainly detect texture borders, while V4 neurons are involved in figure-ground segregation. However, population analysis (SVM decoding of PCA-transformed neuronal responses) reveal that V1 neurons not only detect figure-ground borders, but also contribute to figure-ground texture segregation, although requiring substantially more principal components than V4 neurons to reach a 75 % decoding accuracy. Individually, V1/V4 neurons showing larger (negative/positive) figure-ground response differences contribute more to figure-ground segregation. But for V1 neurons, the contribution becomes significant only when many principal components are considered. We conclude that V1 neurons participate in figure-ground segregation primarily by defining the figure borders, and the poorly structured figure-ground information V1 neurons carry could be further utilized by V4 neurons to accomplish figure-ground segregation.
物体识别通常涉及大脑将物体与其周围环境分离。对图形-背景纹理分离的神经生理学研究得出了不一致的结果,特别是在 V1 神经元是否可以进行图形-背景纹理分离,或者只是检测纹理边界方面。为了从群体角度解决这个问题,我们利用双光子钙成像技术,在清醒、注视的猕猴中同时记录大样本 V1 和 V4 神经元对图形-背景纹理刺激的反应。平均反应变化表明,V1 神经元主要检测纹理边界,而 V4 神经元参与图形-背景分离。然而,群体分析(PCA 变换后的神经元反应的 SVM 解码)显示,V1 神经元不仅检测图形-背景边界,而且有助于图形-背景纹理分离,尽管需要比 V4 神经元多得多的主成分才能达到 75%的解码精度。单独来看,表现出较大(负/正)图形-背景反应差异的 V1/V4 神经元对图形-背景分离的贡献更大。但是对于 V1 神经元,只有当考虑到许多主成分时,贡献才变得显著。我们得出结论,V1 神经元主要通过定义图形边界来参与图形-背景分离,而 V1 神经元携带的结构不良的图形-背景信息可以进一步被 V4 神经元利用来完成图形-背景分离。