School of Natural Sciences, Laurentian University, 935 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 2C6, Canada.
Centre of Forensic Sciences, 25 Morton Shulman Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M3M 0B1, Canada.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2024 Sep;72:103092. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103092. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
This study explored secondary DNA transfer involving saliva, a body fluid often encountered in forensic investigations. Various factors were examined to investigate their potential impact on the transfer of DNA from saliva stains deposited onto common types of fabric (cotton, nylon, and towel). We examined varying types of saliva moisture (wet, dry, and rehydrated) and different types of contact (controlled pressure and active/friction pressure) to quantitatively evaluate how such variables could impact transfer and possible conclusions surrounding saliva-derived DNA deposits. The transfer of DNA was generally least pronounced with more absorbent primary fabrics (cotton and towel materials) while a less absorbent primary fabric (nylon) exhibited a greater propensity for DNA transfer. There were significantly higher amounts of transferred DNA (p < 0.05) observed in wet saliva samples compared to dry and rehydrated saliva samples. Further, the use of active pressure (friction) appeared to result in more DNA transfer overall as compared to controlled pressure contact. Experiments conducted with wet saliva and active pressure (friction) demonstrated the highest likelihood of transfer, with the primary nylon and secondary towel fabric combination demonstrating the greatest average transfer percentage of 94.74 %. The variables explored in this study presented multiple combinations wherein a sufficient amount of DNA (≥ 240 pg total) was transferred to the secondary fabric, making it potentially suitable for STR-PCR amplification in our laboratory. The findings from this study indicate that the type of primary fabric receiving the saliva deposit, the type of saliva moisture, the type of secondary fabric and its moisture type, and the type of contact all have the potential to affect the quantity of DNA transferred and recovered. This study provides empirical data on the ease, and to what extent, DNA from saliva transfers between fabrics and aids DNA activity level evaluations. The significance of this research lies in its contribution to expanding our current understanding of DNA transfer involving saliva within forensic science and criminal investigations.
本研究探讨了涉及唾液的二次 DNA 转移,唾液是法医学调查中经常遇到的一种体液。研究考察了各种因素,以调查它们对从唾液斑转移到常见类型织物(棉、尼龙和毛巾)上的 DNA 的潜在影响。我们检查了不同类型的唾液湿度(湿、干和再水合)和不同类型的接触(受控压力和主动/摩擦压力),以定量评估这些变量如何影响转移以及围绕唾液衍生 DNA 沉积物的可能结论。在更具吸收性的主要织物(棉和毛巾材料)上,DNA 转移通常最不明显,而在吸收性较差的主要织物(尼龙)上,DNA 转移的倾向更大。与干唾液和再水合唾液样本相比,湿唾液样本中观察到的转移 DNA 量明显更高(p < 0.05)。此外,与受控压力接触相比,主动压力(摩擦)的使用似乎总体上导致更多的 DNA 转移。在湿唾液和主动压力(摩擦)实验中,最高的转移可能性得到了证明,主要的尼龙和次要的毛巾织物组合显示出最大的平均转移百分比为 94.74%。本研究中探索的变量呈现出多种组合,其中有足够数量的 DNA(≥240pg 总)转移到次要织物上,使得在我们的实验室中进行 STR-PCR 扩增成为可能。本研究的结果表明,接收唾液沉积物的主要织物类型、唾液湿度类型、次要织物类型及其湿度类型以及接触类型都有可能影响转移和回收的 DNA 量。本研究提供了关于 DNA 从唾液到织物之间转移的难易程度以及转移程度的经验数据,并有助于 DNA 活性水平的评估。这项研究的意义在于它有助于扩大我们目前对法医学和犯罪调查中涉及唾液的 DNA 转移的理解。