Suppr超能文献

基于系统的分析,重新思考使用农药作为试点案例的受监管化学品的欧洲环境风险评估。

A systems-based analysis to rethink the European environmental risk assessment of regulated chemicals using pesticides as a pilot case.

机构信息

Swedish Chemicals Agency (KemI), Sweden.

Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), Switzerland.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2024 Oct 20;948:174526. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174526. Epub 2024 Jul 5.

Abstract

A growing body of scientific literature stresses the need to advance current environmental risk assessment (ERA) methodologies and associated regulatory frameworks to better address the landscape-scale and long-term impact of pesticide use on biodiversity and the ecosystem. Moreover, more collaborative and integrative approaches are needed to meet sustainability goals. The One Health approach is increasingly applied by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to support the transition towards safer, healthier and more sustainable food. To this end, EFSA commissioned the development of a roadmap for action to establish a European Partnership for next-generation, systems-based Environmental Risk Assessment (PERA). Here, we summarise the main conclusions and recommendations reported in the 2022 PERA Roadmap. This roadmap highlights that fragmentation of data, knowledge and expertise across regulatory sectors results in suboptimal processes and hinders the implementation of integrative ERA approaches needed to better protect the environment. To advance ERA, we revisited the underlying assumptions of the current ERA paradigm; that chemical risks are generally assessed and managed in isolation with a substance-by-substance, realistic worst-case and tiered approach. We suggest optimising the use of the vast amount of information and expertise available with pesticides as a pilot area. It is recommended to as soon as possible adopt a systems-based approach, i.e. within the current regulatory framework, to spark a step-wise transition towards an ERA framed at a system level of ecological and societal relevance. Tangible systems-based and integrative steps are available. For instance, the rich sources of existing data for prospective and retrospective ERA of pesticides could be used to reality-benchmark existing and new ERA methods. To achieve these goals, collaboration among stakeholders across scientific disciplines and regulatory sectors must be strengthened.

摘要

越来越多的科学文献强调,需要推进当前的环境风险评估(ERA)方法和相关的监管框架,以更好地应对农药使用对生物多样性和生态系统的景观尺度和长期影响。此外,还需要更具协作性和综合性的方法来实现可持续性目标。欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)越来越多地采用“同一健康”方法来支持向更安全、更健康和更可持续的食品过渡。为此,EFSA委托制定了一项行动计划路线图,以建立一个基于系统的下一代环境风险评估(PERA)的欧洲伙伴关系。在这里,我们总结了 2022 年 PERA 路线图中报告的主要结论和建议。该路线图强调,监管部门之间的数据、知识和专业知识的碎片化导致了流程的优化不足,并阻碍了实施更能保护环境的综合 ERA 方法。为了推进 ERA,我们重新审视了当前 ERA 范式的基本假设;即化学风险通常是孤立地进行评估和管理的,采用逐个物质、现实最严重情况和分层的方法。我们建议优化利用农药这一试点领域的大量信息和专业知识。建议尽快采用基于系统的方法,即在当前监管框架内,逐步向基于生态和社会相关性的系统层面的 ERA 过渡。切实可行的基于系统的和综合性的步骤是可用的。例如,可以利用农药前瞻性和回顾性 ERA 现有丰富数据源,使现有和新的 ERA 方法与现实基准相吻合。为了实现这些目标,必须加强跨科学学科和监管部门的利益相关者之间的合作。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验