Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Laboratório de Etnoecologia e Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Av. Francisco Mota, 572 - Bairro Costa e Silva, Mossoró, RN 59.625-900, Brazil.
Departamento de Ingeniería Agraria y del Medio Natural, Escuela Politécnica Superior de Ingeniería - Sección Agraria, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), Carretera de Geneto nº2, 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna (Tenerife), Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Oct 10;946:174549. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174549. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
The impacts of grazing on rangelands have historically been studied within the framework of the equilibrium model, which predicts significant impacts of grazing on ecosystems. However, in recent decades, studies have observed a non-equilibrium pattern, suggesting that abiotic factors play a primary role compared to grazing. These studies are primarily focused on rangelands, despite animal husbandry occurring in other biomes, such as seasonally dry tropical forests. Our study examines the influence of goat grazing on biodiversity and forest succession in the Brazilian dry forest (Caatinga). Considering its high interannual precipitation variability, we hypothesize a response that aligns with the non-equilibrium paradigm. We established a gradient of grazing intensity and history in areas at different stages of vegetation succession. A survey of tree - shrub and herbaceous species was conducted at each site and the biomass of both strata was quantified. Linear mixed models and Permanova were employed to assess differences in richness, composition, structure, and biomass among the areas. Our results suggest that grazing (history and intensity) and forest fallow age did not affect species richness, but only species composition. Low and high grazing intensity drive ecosystems toward similar compositions, which align with the non-equilibrium model predictions. Biomass in the herbaceous layer remained unaffected by grazing history, intensity, or forest fallow age, whereas woody biomass was influenced by grazing intensity in older forest fallows. Although trees in low-intensity grazing sites were significantly taller compared to those in other levels, overall, grazing did not disrupt the natural succession process. Older forest fallows exhibited greater diversity and higher basal area compared to new forest fallows, irrespective of grazing intensity. Our findings suggest that: a) grazing has minimal effects on biodiversity and biomass due to non-equilibrium dynamics, and b) with appropriate management, grazing can coexist with the conservation of the Caatinga.
放牧对牧场的影响历来是在平衡模型的框架内进行研究的,该模型预测放牧对生态系统有重大影响。然而,近几十年来,研究观察到了一种非平衡模式,表明与放牧相比,非生物因素起着主要作用。这些研究主要集中在牧场,尽管畜牧业也发生在其他生物群系,如季节性干旱的热带森林。我们的研究考察了山羊放牧对巴西干旱森林(卡廷加)生物多样性和森林演替的影响。考虑到其年际降水变化较大,我们假设了一个与非平衡范式一致的响应。我们在不同植被演替阶段的区域建立了放牧强度和历史的梯度。在每个地点进行了树木-灌木和草本物种的调查,并对两个层次的生物量进行了量化。线性混合模型和 Permanova 用于评估不同区域的丰富度、组成、结构和生物量差异。我们的研究结果表明,放牧(历史和强度)和森林休耕期没有影响物种丰富度,而只影响物种组成。低和高放牧强度使生态系统向相似的组成发展,这与非平衡模型的预测一致。草本层的生物量不受放牧历史、强度或森林休耕期的影响,而木质生物量则受较老森林休耕期放牧强度的影响。尽管低强度放牧区的树木明显比其他水平的树木更高,但总体而言,放牧并没有破坏自然演替过程。较老的森林休耕期表现出更高的多样性和更高的基面积,而不论放牧强度如何。我们的研究结果表明:a)由于非平衡动态,放牧对生物多样性和生物量的影响很小;b)通过适当的管理,放牧可以与卡廷加的保护共存。