Suppr超能文献

疼痛 DETECT 评估臀上皮神经卡压性腰痛的可靠性。

Reliability of PainDETECT for Evaluating Low Back Pain Caused by Cluneal Nerve Entrapment.

机构信息

Medical Student, Nippon Medical School.

Department of Neurological Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital.

出版信息

J Nippon Med Sch. 2024;91(3):328-332. doi: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2024_91-312.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Superior/middle cluneal nerve entrapment (CN-E) is an elicitor of low back pain (LBP). The painDETECT questionnaire is used to characterize CN-E symptoms.

METHODS

Nineteen consecutive patients with LBP caused by CN-E (superior CN-E = 7; middle CN-E = 12) participated in a Japanese language painDETECT questionnaire survey before surgery. A score of 12 or lower was recorded as 'neuropathic component unlikely', a score of 19 or higher as 'neuropathic pain likely', and scores between 13 and 18 as 'neuropathic pain possible'. LBP severity was recorded on a numerical rating scale, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the EuroQol-5 dimension-5 level.

RESULTS

The mean painDETECT score was 11.8 and did not significantly differ between the superior CN-E and middle CN-E groups. We classified low back pain as unlikely to have a neuropathic component in 13 patients, as likely to have a neuropathic component in 2 patients, and as possibly neuropathic in 4 patients. There was no significant difference in the pain level of patients with scores of ≤12 and ≥13 on painDETECT. All patients reported trigger pain; the positive rate was high for electric shock pain, radiating pain, and pain attacks and low for a burning or tingling sensation, pain elicited by a light touch, and pain caused by cold or hot stimulation.

CONCLUSION

The painDETECT questionnaire may not reliably identify LBP caused by superior/middle CN-E as neuropathic pain. A diagnosis of LBP due to CN-E must be made carefully because symptoms resemble nociceptive pain.

摘要

背景

臀中/上部皮神经卡压(CN-E)可引起腰痛(LBP)。疼痛 DETECT 问卷用于描述 CN-E 症状。

方法

19 例由 CN-E 引起的 LBP 患者(上部 CN-E=7 例;中部 CN-E=12 例)在手术前接受了日语疼痛 DETECT 问卷调查。得分 12 或以下为“神经病变成分可能性小”,得分 19 或以上为“神经病理性疼痛可能性大”,得分 13-18 为“神经病理性疼痛可能”。腰痛严重程度采用数字评分量表、Roland-Morris 残疾问卷和 EuroQol-5 维度 5 级量表进行记录。

结果

疼痛 DETECT 评分的平均值为 11.8,上部 CN-E 和中部 CN-E 组之间无显著差异。我们将 13 例患者的腰痛归类为神经病变成分可能性小,2 例患者归类为神经病变成分可能性大,4 例患者归类为神经病变疼痛可能。疼痛 DETECT 评分≤12 分和≥13 分的患者疼痛水平无显著差异。所有患者均报告触发痛;电击样痛、放射痛和发作痛的阳性率高,烧灼感或刺痛感、轻触诱发痛和冷或热刺激引起的痛的阳性率低。

结论

疼痛 DETECT 问卷可能无法可靠地将由上部/中部 CN-E 引起的 LBP 识别为神经病理性疼痛。由于症状类似于伤害性疼痛,因此必须仔细诊断 CN-E 引起的 LBP。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验