• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者参与多学科高风险手术讨论:一项试点研究。

Patient Participation in Multidisciplinary High-Risk Surgery Discussions: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2024 Jul;27(7):912-915. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0655. Epub 2024 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2023.0655
PMID:38973547
Abstract

Our medical center implemented a multidisciplinary team to improve surgical decision making for high-risk older adults. To make this a patient-centric process, a pilot program included the patient and their family/caregiver(s) in these conversations. Our hypothesis is that multidisciplinary team discussions can improve difficult surgical decision making. From January to June 2022, we offered patients and their family participation in multidisciplinary discussions at a Veterans Affairs medical center. Semistructured interviews were conducted 1-6 days after the meeting. Interview transcripts were analyzed with qualitative mixed-methods approach. Six patients and caregivers participated in the interviews. They found the discussion helpful for improving their understanding of the surgical decision. Out of these, 50% (3 of 6) of the patients changed their decision regarding the planned operation based on the discussion. Including patients and caregiver(s) in multidisciplinary surgical decision-making discussions resulted in half of the patients changing their surgical plans. This pilot study demonstrated both acceptance and feasibility for all participants.

摘要

我们的医疗中心组建了多学科团队,以改进高风险老年患者的手术决策。为了使这一过程以患者为中心,一个试点项目让患者及其家属/照护者(们)参与到这些对话中。我们的假设是,多学科团队讨论可以改善困难的手术决策。 2022 年 1 月至 6 月,我们在退伍军人事务医疗中心为患者及其家属提供了参加多学科讨论的机会。在会议结束后 1-6 天进行了半结构化访谈。使用定性混合方法分析访谈记录。 六名患者及其照护者参加了访谈。他们发现讨论有助于提高他们对手术决策的理解。其中,50%(6 人中的 3 人)的患者根据讨论改变了对计划手术的决定。 让患者及其家属/照护者参与多学科手术决策讨论,导致一半的患者改变了手术计划。这项试点研究显示了所有参与者的接受度和可行性。

相似文献

1
Patient Participation in Multidisciplinary High-Risk Surgery Discussions: A Pilot Study.患者参与多学科高风险手术讨论:一项试点研究。
J Palliat Med. 2024 Jul;27(7):912-915. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0655. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
2
Cancer caregivers advocate a patient- and family-centered approach to advance care planning.癌症护理者提倡采用以患者和家庭为中心的方法进行预先护理规划。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Jun;47(6):1064-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
3
Improving the palliative-procedure decision-making process for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: A secondary analysis.提高腹膜癌病患者姑息治疗决策过程的质量:二次分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Sep;188:125-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.06.014. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
4
A pilot study to evaluate the impact of involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment plan.一项评估让乳腺癌患者参与其疾病及治疗方案多学科讨论的影响的试点研究。
Breast. 2007 Apr;16(2):178-89. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2006.10.002. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
5
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Assessing the association between quantity and quality of family caregiver participation in decision-making clinical encounters on patient activation in the metastatic breast cancer setting.评估转移性乳腺癌环境下,家庭照顾者参与决策性临床诊疗的数量和质量与患者激活之间的关联。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jun 11;32(7):422. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08593-1.
7
Reducing complexity of patient decision aids for community-based older adults with dementia and their caregivers: multiple case study of Decision Boxes.降低基于社区的老年痴呆症患者及其照护者的决策辅助工具的复杂性:Decision Boxes 的多个案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e027727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027727.
8
Development and Field Testing of a Long-Term Care Decision Aid Website for Older Adults: Engaging Patients and Caregivers in User-Centered Design.开发和实地测试面向老年患者的长期护理决策辅助网站:以患者和护理人员为中心的设计。
Gerontologist. 2020 Jul 15;60(5):935-946. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz141.
9
An Exploratory Pilot Study to Describe Shared Decision-Making for PTSD Treatment Planning: The Provider Perspective.一项描述创伤后应激障碍治疗计划共同决策的探索性试点研究:提供者视角。
Mil Med. 2019 Mar 1;184(Suppl 1):467-475. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy407.
10
Caregiver participation in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings via videophone technology: A pilot study to improve pain management.护理人员通过可视电话技术参与临终关怀多学科团队会议:一项改善疼痛管理的试点研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2010 Nov;27(7):465-73. doi: 10.1177/1049909110362402. Epub 2010 Mar 18.