• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成功应用丙泊酚治疗难治性症状患者姑息性镇静失败后。

Successful Use of Propofol After Failed Palliative Sedation in Patients With Refractory Symptoms.

机构信息

Palliative Care Unit, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

Health Research Institute of the Jimenez Diaz Foundation, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2024 Oct;27(10):1339-1345. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0672. Epub 2024 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2023.0672
PMID:38973718
Abstract

Propofol is a general anesthetic used in multiple clinical scenarios. Despite growing evidence supporting its use in palliative care, propofol is rarely used in palliative sedation. Reluctance toward the adoption of propofol as a sedative agent is often associated with fear of adverse events such as respiratory arrest. We aimed to describe efficacy and safety of palliative sedation in refractory sedation with propofol using a protocol based on low, incremental dosing. A retrospective observational study featuring inpatients receiving sedative treatment with propofol in our palliative care unit in Madrid (Spain) between March 1, 2018 and February 28, 2023, following a newly developed protocol. During the study period, 22 patients underwent sedation with propofol. Propofol was used successfully to control different refractory symptoms, mainly psychoexistential suffering and . All patients had undergone previous failed attempts at sedation with other medications (midazolam or lemovepromazine) and presented risk factors for complicated sedation. All patients achieved satisfactory (profound) levels of sedation measured with the Ramsay Sedation Scale, but total doses varied greatly between patients. Most patients (17, 77%) received combined therapy with propofol and other sedative medications to harness synergies. The median time between start of sedation with propofol and death was 26.0 hours. No cases of apnea or death during induction were recorded. A protocol for palliative sedation with propofol based on low, incremental dosing, with the option of administering an initial induction bolus, shows excellent results regarding adequate levels of sedation, without observing apnea or respiratory depression. Our results promote the use of propofol to achieve palliative sedation in patients with refractory symptoms and risk factors for complicated sedation at the end of life.

摘要

异丙酚是一种在多种临床情况下使用的全身麻醉剂。尽管越来越多的证据支持将其用于姑息治疗,但异丙酚在姑息镇静治疗中很少使用。人们对将异丙酚作为镇静剂采用的抵触通常与对呼吸停止等不良事件的恐惧有关。我们旨在描述使用基于低剂量递增的方案的异丙酚姑息镇静治疗难治性镇静的疗效和安全性。

这是一项回顾性观察研究,纳入了 2018 年 3 月 1 日至 2023 年 2 月 28 日期间在马德里(西班牙)姑息治疗病房接受异丙酚镇静治疗的住院患者。在研究期间,有 22 名患者接受了异丙酚镇静。异丙酚成功地用于控制不同的难治性症状,主要是心理存在痛苦和 。所有患者均在前一次使用其他药物(咪达唑仑或左美丙嗪)镇静治疗失败且存在镇静治疗并发症风险因素的情况下接受了治疗。所有患者均达到了满意(深度)的镇静水平,通过 Ramsay 镇静评分测量,但患者之间的总剂量差异很大。大多数患者(17 例,77%)接受了异丙酚联合其他镇静药物的联合治疗,以发挥协同作用。从开始使用异丙酚镇静到死亡的中位数时间为 26.0 小时。在诱导过程中没有记录到呼吸暂停或死亡的情况。

基于低剂量递增、可给予初始诱导剂量的异丙酚姑息镇静方案显示出良好的结果,可达到适当的镇静水平,而不会出现呼吸暂停或呼吸抑制。我们的结果促进了在难治性症状和临终时镇静治疗并发症风险因素的患者中使用异丙酚来实现姑息镇静。

相似文献

1
Successful Use of Propofol After Failed Palliative Sedation in Patients With Refractory Symptoms.成功应用丙泊酚治疗难治性症状患者姑息性镇静失败后。
J Palliat Med. 2024 Oct;27(10):1339-1345. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0672. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
2
Deep continuous sedation at the patient's request until death in a palliative care unit: retrospective study.患者要求在姑息治疗病房内接受深度持续镇静直至死亡:回顾性研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Feb 21;14(1):60-64. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004551.
3
Propofol for palliative sedation.异丙酚用于姑息性镇静。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Mar;10(1):4-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001899. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
4
Propofol-Based Palliative Sedation to Treat Antipsychotic-Resistant Agitated Delirium.基于丙泊酚的姑息性镇静治疗抗精神病药物难治性激越性谵妄
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2017 Sep-Dec;31(3-4):190-194. doi: 10.1080/15360288.2017.1315476. Epub 2017 May 16.
5
Propofol-based palliative sedation in terminally ill children with solid tumors: A case series.基于丙泊酚的姑息性镇静用于实体瘤晚期儿童:病例系列
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(21):e15615. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015615.
6
Efficacy and safety of palliative sedation therapy: a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted on specialized palliative care units in Japan.姑息性镇静治疗的疗效与安全性:一项在日本专科姑息治疗病房开展的多中心、前瞻性观察性研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Oct;30(4):320-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.03.017.
7
Clinical and ethical aspects of palliative sedation with propofol-A retrospective quantitative and qualitative study.丙泊酚姑息镇静的临床和伦理方面:一项回顾性定量和定性研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Oct;64(9):1319-1326. doi: 10.1111/aas.13665. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
8
Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam for End-of-Life Sedation and Agitation: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (The DREAMS Trial).右美托咪定对比咪达唑仑用于终末镇静和激越:一项随机对照试验方案(DREAMS 试验)。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 4;13:e55129. doi: 10.2196/55129.
9
Prolonged sedation of critically ill patients with midazolam or propofol: impact on weaning and costs.使用咪达唑仑或丙泊酚对重症患者进行长时间镇静:对脱机及成本的影响。
Crit Care Med. 1997 Jan;25(1):33-40. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199701000-00009.
10
Sedative use in the last week of life and the implications for end-of-life decision making.生命最后一周使用镇静剂及其对临终决策的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Feb 10;163(3):341-4. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.3.341.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequency and predictors of palliative sedation among patients with cancer who died in a specialist inpatient palliative care unit: a retrospective study.在专科住院姑息治疗病房死亡的癌症患者中姑息性镇静的频率及预测因素:一项回顾性研究
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 May 29;24(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01787-2.