Suppr超能文献

全球促红细胞生成素外部质量评估中实验室结果及方法精密度的纵向评估

Longitudinal evaluation of laboratory results and method precision in worldwide erythropoietin external quality assessments.

作者信息

Toll Luisa, Weiss Nathalie, Vierbaum Laura, Schellenberg Ingo, Thevis Mario, Wenzel Folker

机构信息

Faculty of Medical and Life Sciences, Furtwangen University, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.

Institute of Biochemistry/ Center for Preventive Doping Research, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Front Mol Biosci. 2024 Jun 21;11:1390079. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1390079. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

This study presents a longitudinal analysis of external quality assessment (EQA) results for erythropoietin (EPO) determinations conducted between 2017 and 2022 with a continuously increasing number of participating laboratories. The aim of this work was to evaluate participant performance and methodological aspects. In each of the eleven EQA surveys, a blinded sample set of lyophilized human serum containing one sample with lower EPO concentrations (L) and one with higher EPO concentrations (H) was sent to the participating laboratories. A total of 1,256 measurements were included. The median (interquartile range) fraction of participants not meeting the criteria of acceptance set at 20% around the robust mean of the respective survey was 9.5% (6.1%-10.7%) (sample L) and 9.1% (5.8%-11.8%) (sample H) but lacked a clear trend in the observed period. Some surveys exhibited unusually high interlaboratory variation, suggesting interfering components in the EQA samples. Different immunological methods and reagent manufacturers also showed variability in measurement outcomes to some extent. These findings highlight the need for continuous quality assessment in EPO measurements to ensure patient safety and identify areas for further research and investigation.

摘要

本研究对2017年至2022年间进行的促红细胞生成素(EPO)测定的外部质量评估(EQA)结果进行了纵向分析,参与实验室的数量持续增加。这项工作的目的是评估参与者的表现和方法学方面。在十一次EQA调查的每一次中,都向参与实验室发送了一组冻干人血清的盲样,其中包含一个EPO浓度较低(L)的样本和一个EPO浓度较高(H)的样本。总共纳入了1256次测量。未达到在各自调查的稳健均值周围设定的20%接受标准的参与者的中位数(四分位间距)比例在样本L中为9.5%(6.1%-10.7%),在样本H中为9.1%(5.8%-11.8%),但在观察期内没有明显趋势。一些调查显示实验室间差异异常高,表明EQA样本中存在干扰成分。不同的免疫方法和试剂制造商在测量结果上也在一定程度上表现出变异性。这些发现凸显了在EPO测量中进行持续质量评估以确保患者安全并确定进一步研究和调查领域的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d50/11224661/eb7327ec3190/fmolb-11-1390079-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验