• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
VERITAS?: A time for VERIQAS™ and a new approach to training, education, and the quality assessment of CD4+ T lymphocyte counting (I).VERITAS:VERIQAS™的时代,以及培训、教育和 CD4+ T 淋巴细胞计数质量评估的新方法(一)。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2012 Mar;82(2):93-100. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20624. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
2
Large-scale affordable PanLeucogated CD4+ testing with proactive internal and external quality assessment: in support of the South African national comprehensive care, treatment and management programme for HIV and AIDS.大规模可负担得起的全白细胞分类CD4+检测以及主动的内部和外部质量评估:支持南非国家艾滋病毒和艾滋病综合护理、治疗与管理计划。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2008;74 Suppl 1:S40-51. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20384.
3
African regional external quality assessment for CD4 T-cell enumeration: development, outcomes, and performance of laboratories.非洲地区CD4 T细胞计数的外部质量评估:实验室的发展、结果与表现
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2008;74 Suppl 1:S69-79. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20397.
4
Current laboratory practices in flow cytometry for the enumeration of CD 4(+) T-lymphocyte subsets.流式细胞术检测 CD4(+) T 淋巴细胞亚群计数的当前实验室操作规范。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2015 Sep-Oct;88(5):305-11. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21241. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
5
Categorizing and Establishing CD4 Service Equivalency: Testing of Residual, Archived External Quality Assessment Scheme Sample Panels Enables Accelerated Virtual Peer Laboratory Review.分类和建立 CD4 服务等效性:对剩余的、存档的外部质量评估计划样本进行测试,使虚拟同行实验室审查得以加速。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2019 Sep;96(5):404-416. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21772. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
6
External Quality Assessment on CD4+ T-Cell Count Using in-House Proficiency Testing Panels for CD4 Count Laboratories in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴CD4计数实验室使用内部能力验证样本对CD4+ T细胞计数进行的外部质量评估。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2019 May;29(3):309-320. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v29i3.3.
7
Acceptable "Real-Life" Variability for Lymphocyte Counts by Flow Cytometry.流式细胞术检测淋巴细胞计数的可接受“真实生活”变异性。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2019 Sep;96(5):379-388. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21751. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
8
Laboratory Accuracy Improvement in the UK NEQAS Leucocyte Immunophenotyping Immune Monitoring Program: An Eleven-Year Review via Longitudinal Mixed Effects Modeling.英国 NEQAS 白细胞免疫表型免疫监测计划的实验室准确性改进:通过纵向混合效应模型进行的十一年回顾。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2018 Mar;94(2):250-256. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21531. Epub 2017 May 16.
9
UK NEQAS for leucocyte immunophenotyping: the first 10 years.英国白细胞免疫表型分析外部质量评估计划:头10年
J Clin Pathol. 2001 Jul;54(7):508-11. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.7.508.
10
Flow cytometric lymphocyte subset enumeration: 10 years of external quality assessment in the Benelux countries.流式细胞术淋巴细胞亚群计数:比荷卢三国10年的外部质量评估
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2008 Mar;74(2):79-90. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20370.

引用本文的文献

1
A Critical Review on the Standardization and Quality Assessment of Nonfunctional Laboratory Tests Frequently Used to Identify Inborn Errors of Immunity.非功能性实验室检测在鉴定先天性免疫缺陷中的标准化和质量评估的批判性综述
Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 9;12:721289. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.721289. eCollection 2021.
2
Evaluation of a collaborative model for successful implementation of a National CD4 enumeration EQA program in Cameroon.评价喀麦隆建立国家 CD4 计数室间质量评价计划的成功实施的合作模式。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 2;11(1):11536. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91015-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating new CD4 enumeration technologies for resource-constrained countries.评估适用于资源有限国家的新型CD4细胞计数技术。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 Nov;6(11 Suppl):S29-38. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2000.
2
CD4 immunophenotyping in HIV infection.HIV感染中的CD4免疫分型
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 Nov;6(11 Suppl):S7-15. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1998.
3
Immune correlates of CD4 decline in HIV-infected patients experiencing virologic failure before undergoing treatment interruption.在接受治疗中断前出现病毒学失败的HIV感染患者中CD4下降的免疫相关因素。
BMC Infect Dis. 2008 May 2;8:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-59.
4
Large-scale affordable PanLeucogated CD4+ testing with proactive internal and external quality assessment: in support of the South African national comprehensive care, treatment and management programme for HIV and AIDS.大规模可负担得起的全白细胞分类CD4+检测以及主动的内部和外部质量评估:支持南非国家艾滋病毒和艾滋病综合护理、治疗与管理计划。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2008;74 Suppl 1:S40-51. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20384.
5
Impact of the international program for Quality Assessment and Standardization for Immunological Measures Relevant to HIV/AIDS: QASI.国际艾滋病相关免疫措施质量评估与标准化项目(QASI)的影响
Cytometry. 2002 Apr 15;50(2):111-6. doi: 10.1002/cyto.10088.
6
Quality control of CD4+ T-lymphocyte enumeration: results from the last 9 years of the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Immune Monitoring (1993-2001).CD4 + T淋巴细胞计数的质量控制:英国免疫监测国家外部质量评估计划(1993 - 2001年)过去9年的结果
Cytometry. 2002 Apr 15;50(2):102-10. doi: 10.1002/cyto.10094.
7
Affordable CD4+ T cell counts by flow cytometry. II. The use of fixed whole blood in resource-poor settings.通过流式细胞术获得可负担得起的CD4+ T细胞计数。II. 在资源匮乏地区使用固定全血。
J Immunol Methods. 2001 Nov 1;257(1-2):145-54. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(01)00458-6.
8
Reduction of intra- and interlaboratory variation in CD34+ stem cell enumeration using stable test material, standard protocols and targeted training. DK34 Task Force of the European Working Group of Clinical Cell Analysis (EWGCCA).
Br J Haematol. 2000 Mar;108(4):784-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.01932.x.
9
Absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte and CD34+ stem cell counts by single-platform flow cytometry: the way forward.通过单平台流式细胞术检测绝对CD4 + T淋巴细胞和CD34 +干细胞计数:前进的方向。
Br J Haematol. 1999 Sep;106(4):1059-62. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01632.x.
10
Quality assessment of CD34+ stem cell enumeration: experience of the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) using a unique stable whole blood preparation.
Br J Haematol. 1998 Jul;102(2):553-65. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00784.x.

VERITAS:VERIQAS™的时代,以及培训、教育和 CD4+ T 淋巴细胞计数质量评估的新方法(一)。

VERITAS?: A time for VERIQAS™ and a new approach to training, education, and the quality assessment of CD4+ T lymphocyte counting (I).

机构信息

UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield S10 2QD, England.

Immunology Quality Assessment Center, Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 2 Genome Court, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

出版信息

Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2012 Mar;82(2):93-100. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20624. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1002/cyto.b.20624
PMID:21998025
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4126193/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of clinical laboratories is to produce accurate and reproducible results to enable effective and reliable clinical practice and patient management. The standard approach is to use both internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assessment (EQA). IQC serves, in many instances, as a "go, no go" tool to provide real time assurance that instruments and reagent or test systems are performing within defined specifications. EQA however, takes a snapshot at a specific point in time of the full testing process, results are compared to other laboratories performing similar testing but inevitably has some built in delay from sample issue to performance data review. In addition, if IQC or EQA identify areas of concern it can be difficult to determine the exact nature of the problem. In an attempt to address this problem, we have developed an instant QA panel that we have termed VERIQAS™, specifically for CD4(+) T lymphocyte counting, and have undertaken a "proof of principle" pilot study to examine how the use of VERIQAS™ could result in improvement of laboratory performance. In addition, we have examined how this approach could be used as a training and education tool (in a domestic/international setting) and potentially be of value in instrument validation/switch studies (a switch study being defined as a laboratory changing from one method/instrument to a new method/instrument with the VERIQAS™ panel being used as an adjunct to their standard switch study protocol).

METHODS

The basic panel consists of 20 stabilized samples, with predefined CD4(+) T lymphocyte counts, that span low clinically relevant to normal counts, including some blinded replicates (singlet up to quadruplicate combinations). The CD4(+) T lymphocyte target values for each specimen is defined as the trimmed mean ± 2 trimmed standard deviations, where the trimmed values are derived from the CD4(+) T lymphocyte counts reported by the participating centers (~780 laboratories) that receive each UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping send out. Results for the VERIQAS™ panel were returned online, via a specially designed website, and the participant was provided with an immediate assessment (pass or fail).

RESULTS

To date, the panel has been preliminary trialed by eight laboratories to (i) assess pre-EQA qualification (two laboratories); (ii) address performance issues (two laboratories); or (iii) validate new instruments or techniques (four laboratories). Interestingly, even in this pilot study, the panel has been instrumental in identifying specific technical problems in laboratories with EQA performance issues as well as confirming that implementation of new techniques or instruments have been successful.

CONCLUSION

We report here a new and novel "proof of principle" pilot study to quality assessment, that we have termed VERIQAS™, designed to provide instant feedback on performance. Participating laboratories receive 20 "blinded" samples that are in singlet up to quadruplicate combinations. Once a centre reports its results via a website, immediate feedback is provided to both the participant and the EQA organizers, enabling, if required, the initiation of targeted remedial action. We have also shown that this approach has the potential to be used as a tool for prequalification, troubleshooting, training and instrument verification. Pilot phase field trials with VERIQAS™ have shown that the panel can highlight laboratory performance problems, such as suboptimal instrument set up, pipetting and gating strategies, in a rapid and efficient manner. VERIQAS™ will now be introduced, where appropriate, as a second phase study within UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping to assist those laboratories that have performance issues and also made available to laboratories for training and education of staff and instrument validation studies.

摘要

背景

临床实验室的目的是生成准确且可重现的结果,以支持有效的临床实践和患者管理。标准方法是同时使用内部质量控制(IQC)和外部质量评估(EQA)。在许多情况下,IQC 充当“是/否”工具,实时保证仪器和试剂或测试系统在规定的规范内运行。然而,EQA 仅在特定时间点获取整个测试过程的快照,将结果与执行类似测试的其他实验室进行比较,但不可避免地会存在从样本发出到性能数据审查的固有延迟。此外,如果 IQC 或 EQA 发现存在问题,可能难以确定问题的确切性质。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一个即时 QA 面板,我们称之为 VERIQAS™,专门用于 CD4(+)T 淋巴细胞计数,并进行了“原理验证”试点研究,以检查 VERIQAS™ 的使用如何能够提高实验室的性能。此外,我们还研究了如何将这种方法用作培训和教育工具(在国内/国际环境中),并可能在仪器验证/切换研究中具有价值(切换研究被定义为实验室从一种方法/仪器切换到新的方法/仪器,使用 VERIQAS™ 面板作为其标准切换研究协议的补充)。

方法

基本面板由 20 个具有预定义 CD4(+)T 淋巴细胞计数的稳定样本组成,涵盖低临床相关到正常计数,包括一些盲样重复(单份至四倍重复组合)。每个样本的 CD4(+)T 淋巴细胞目标值定义为修剪均值±2 个修剪标准差,其中修剪值是从参与中心(约 780 个实验室)报告的 CD4(+)T 淋巴细胞计数中得出的,这些实验室接收每个英国白细胞免疫表型 NEQAS 发送的结果。VERIQAS™ 面板的结果通过专门设计的网站在线返回,参与者将立即获得评估(通过/不通过)。

结果

迄今为止,该面板已由八个实验室进行初步试用,以(i)评估预 EQA 资格(两个实验室);(ii)解决性能问题(两个实验室);或(iii)验证新仪器或技术(四个实验室)。有趣的是,即使在这个试点研究中,该面板在确定具有 EQA 性能问题的实验室中的特定技术问题方面也发挥了重要作用,并确认了新的技术或仪器的实施是成功的。

结论

我们在此报告了一种新的“原理验证”试点研究,我们称之为 VERIQAS™,旨在提供即时的性能反馈。参与实验室收到 20 个“盲样”,这些样本可以是单份、双倍或四倍重复组合。一旦中心通过网站报告其结果,参与者和 EQA 组织者将立即收到反馈,如有需要,可以启动有针对性的补救措施。我们还表明,这种方法有可能用作预认证、故障排除、培训和仪器验证的工具。使用 VERIQAS™ 的试点阶段现场试验表明,该面板可以快速有效地突出实验室性能问题,例如仪器设置、移液和门控策略不理想。VERIQAS™ 将作为英国白细胞免疫表型 NEQAS 的第二阶段研究引入适当的实验室,以帮助那些有性能问题的实验室,并提供给实验室用于员工培训和仪器验证研究。