• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的颅外压力(ECP)监测:一项验证腹腔内压力(IAP)测量用于预测颅内压(ICP)的前瞻性研究。

Extracranial pressure (ECP) monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI): A prospective study validating intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement for predicting intracranial pressure (ICP).

作者信息

Gupta Mohit, Chaturvedi Jitender, Huda Farhanul, Poonia Rahul Singh, Ruchika Fnu, Goyal Nishant, Sihag Rakesh, Sadhasivam Saravanan, Gupta Priyanka, Arora Rajneesh, Agrawal Sanjay, Shukla Dhaval

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

出版信息

Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Jun 28;15:216. doi: 10.25259/SNI_108_2024. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.25259/SNI_108_2024
PMID:38974569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11225532/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intracranial pressure (ICP)--guided therapy is the standard of care in the management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Ideal ICP monitoring technique is not yet available, based on its risks associated with bleeding, infection, or its unavailability at major centers. Authors propose that ICP can be gauged based on measuring pressures of other anatomical cavities, for example, the abdominal cavity. Researchers explored the possibility of monitoring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) to predict ICP in severe TBI patients.

METHODS

We measured ICP and IAP in severe TBI patients. ICP was measured using standard right frontal external ventricular drain (EVD) insertion and connecting it to the transducer. IAP was measured using a well-established technique of vesical pressure measurement through a manometer.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients ( = 28) with an age range of 18-65 years (mean of 32.36 years ± 13.52 years [Standard deviation]) and the median age of 28.00 years with an interquartile range (21.00-42.00 years) were recruited in this prospective study. About 57.1% ( = 16) of these patients were in the age range of 18-30 years. About 92.9% ( = 26) of the patients were male. The most common mode of injury (78.6%) was road traffic accidents ( = 22) and the mean Glasgow Coma Scale at presentation was 4.04 (range 3-9). The mean ICP measured at the presentation of this patient cohort was 20.04 mmHg. This mean ICP (mmHg) decreased from a maximum of 20.04 at the 0 h' time point (at the time of insertion of EVD) to a minimum of 12.09 at the 96 hr time point. This change in mean ICP (from 0 h to 96 h) was found to be statistically significant (Friedman Test: χ = 87.6, ≤ 0.001). The mean IAP (cmH2O) decreased from a maximum of 16.71 at the 0 h' time point to a minimum of 9.68 at the 96 h' time point. This change was statistically significant (Friedman Test: χ = 71.8, ≤ 0.001). The per unit percentage change in IAP on per unit percentage change in ICP we observed was correlated to each other. The correlation coefficient between these variables varied from 0.71 to 0.89 at different time frames. It followed a trend in a directly proportional manner and was found to be statistically significant ( < 0.001) in each time frame of the study. The rise in one parameter followed the rise in another parameter and vice versa.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we established that the ICP of severe TBI patients correlates well with IAP at presentation. This correlation was strong and constant, irrespective of the timeframe during the treatment and monitoring. This study also established that draining cerebrospinal fluid to decrease ICP in severe TBI patients is reflected in IAP. The study validates that IAP is a strong proxy of ICP in severe TBI patients.

摘要

背景

颅内压(ICP)引导下的治疗是重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)管理的标准治疗方法。基于与出血、感染相关的风险或在主要中心无法使用,目前尚未有理想的ICP监测技术。作者提出,可以通过测量其他解剖腔隙(如腹腔)的压力来评估ICP。研究人员探讨了监测腹腔内压力(IAP)以预测重度TBI患者ICP的可能性。

方法

我们测量了重度TBI患者的ICP和IAP。ICP通过标准的右额叶外侧脑室引流管(EVD)插入并连接到传感器进行测量。IAP使用通过压力计测量膀胱压力的成熟技术进行测量。

结果

在这项前瞻性研究中,共招募了28例年龄在18 - 65岁(平均32.36岁±13.52岁[标准差])、中位年龄28.00岁、四分位间距为(21.00 - 42.00岁)的患者。这些患者中约57.1%(n = 16)年龄在18 - 30岁。约92.9%(n = 26)的患者为男性。最常见的损伤方式(78.6%)是道路交通事故(n = 22),入院时的平均格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为4.04(范围3 - 9)。该患者队列入院时测量的平均ICP为20.04 mmHg。这个平均ICP(mmHg)从0小时时间点(EVD插入时)的最大值20.04降至96小时时间点的最小值12.09。发现平均ICP(从0小时到96小时)的这种变化具有统计学意义(弗里德曼检验:χ = 87.6,P ≤ 0.001)。平均IAP(cmH₂O)从0小时时间点的最大值16.71降至96小时时间点的最小值9.68。这种变化具有统计学意义(弗里德曼检验:χ = 71.8,P ≤ 0.001)。我们观察到IAP的单位百分比变化与ICP的单位百分比变化相互关联。这些变量之间的相关系数在不同时间框架内从0.71到0.89不等。它呈直接比例趋势,并且在研究的每个时间框架内都具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。一个参数的升高伴随着另一个参数的升高,反之亦然。

结论

在本研究中,我们确定重度TBI患者的ICP在入院时与IAP密切相关。这种相关性很强且恒定,与治疗和监测期间的时间框架无关。本研究还确定,在重度TBI患者中,通过引流脑脊液降低ICP会反映在IAP中。该研究验证了IAP是重度TBI患者ICP的有力替代指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/ef403bd6b9e6/SNI-15-216-g024.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/0791882a34d6/SNI-15-216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/f1562ac04a78/SNI-15-216-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/ce797bddb44f/SNI-15-216-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/44610296bb2d/SNI-15-216-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/7e7896a22e43/SNI-15-216-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/ff6f72d1a02f/SNI-15-216-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/83d8b5734018/SNI-15-216-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/62f2a9ec7690/SNI-15-216-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/9616dc2524e5/SNI-15-216-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/2a2964805fac/SNI-15-216-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/c131bfa38e09/SNI-15-216-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/019d025ba54d/SNI-15-216-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/5bd6beb6d49f/SNI-15-216-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/c1b8e5aa0269/SNI-15-216-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/9296720ab64a/SNI-15-216-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/e2f6cc8bcccb/SNI-15-216-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/02b4e0e01fc0/SNI-15-216-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/7bccd942003b/SNI-15-216-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/230d50072997/SNI-15-216-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/d1b2d16d5a16/SNI-15-216-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/040ef5b23977/SNI-15-216-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/0473246bee67/SNI-15-216-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/eefff3cce005/SNI-15-216-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/ef403bd6b9e6/SNI-15-216-g024.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/0791882a34d6/SNI-15-216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/f1562ac04a78/SNI-15-216-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/ce797bddb44f/SNI-15-216-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/44610296bb2d/SNI-15-216-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/7e7896a22e43/SNI-15-216-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/ff6f72d1a02f/SNI-15-216-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/83d8b5734018/SNI-15-216-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/62f2a9ec7690/SNI-15-216-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/9616dc2524e5/SNI-15-216-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/2a2964805fac/SNI-15-216-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/c131bfa38e09/SNI-15-216-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/019d025ba54d/SNI-15-216-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/5bd6beb6d49f/SNI-15-216-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/c1b8e5aa0269/SNI-15-216-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/9296720ab64a/SNI-15-216-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/e2f6cc8bcccb/SNI-15-216-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/02b4e0e01fc0/SNI-15-216-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/7bccd942003b/SNI-15-216-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/230d50072997/SNI-15-216-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/d1b2d16d5a16/SNI-15-216-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/040ef5b23977/SNI-15-216-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/0473246bee67/SNI-15-216-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/eefff3cce005/SNI-15-216-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a17/11225532/ef403bd6b9e6/SNI-15-216-g024.jpg

相似文献

1
Extracranial pressure (ECP) monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI): A prospective study validating intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement for predicting intracranial pressure (ICP).重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的颅外压力(ECP)监测:一项验证腹腔内压力(IAP)测量用于预测颅内压(ICP)的前瞻性研究。
Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Jun 28;15:216. doi: 10.25259/SNI_108_2024. eCollection 2024.
2
Intermittent versus continuous cerebrospinal fluid drainage management in adult severe traumatic brain injury: assessment of intracranial pressure burden.成人重型颅脑损伤中间歇性与持续性脑脊液引流管理:颅内压负担评估
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Feb;20(1):49-53. doi: 10.1007/s12028-013-9885-3.
3
Hypertonic saline reduces cumulative and daily intracranial pressure burdens after severe traumatic brain injury.高渗盐水可降低重度创伤性脑损伤后的颅内压累积负担和每日负担。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Jan;122(1):202-10. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS132545.
4
Assessment of Dynamic Intracranial Compliance in Children with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Proof-of-Concept.评估严重创伤性脑损伤儿童的动态颅内顺应性:概念验证。
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Feb;34(1):209-217. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01004-3.
5
Introduction of severe traumatic brain injury care protocol is associated with reduction in mortality for pediatric patients: a case study of Children's Healthcare of Atlanta's neurotrauma program.重度创伤性脑损伤护理方案的引入与儿科患者死亡率的降低相关:以亚特兰大儿童医疗中心神经创伤项目为例的一项案例研究。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Aug;22(2):165-172. doi: 10.3171/2018.2.PEDS17562. Epub 2018 May 25.
6
Increased intra-abdominal, intrathoracic, and intracranial pressure after severe brain injury: multiple compartment syndrome.严重脑损伤后腹内压、胸内压和颅内压升高:多腔隙综合征
J Trauma. 2007 Mar;62(3):647-56; discussion 656. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31802ee542.
7
Characterizing the Response to Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage in Patients with an External Ventricular Drain: The Pressure Equalization Ratio.描述有外部脑室引流的患者对脑脊液引流的反应:压力均衡比。
Neurocrit Care. 2019 Apr;30(2):340-347. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0612-y.
8
Role of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Management of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Results of a Large Level I Trauma Center in Southern Iran.颅内压监测在重度创伤性脑损伤患者管理中的作用:伊朗南部一家大型一级创伤中心的研究结果
World Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;94:120-125. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.06.122. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
9
Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Intensity Level of Therapy (PILOT) scale: a measure of the use of intracranial pressure-directed therapies.儿童治疗强度水平(PILOT)量表的信效度:一种颅内压导向治疗使用情况的测量方法
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jul;34(7):1981-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000220765.22184.ED.
10
Intracranial pressure monitoring among children with severe traumatic brain injury.重度创伤性脑损伤患儿的颅内压监测
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Nov;16(5):523-532. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.PEDS14507. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

本文引用的文献

1
A clinical decision rule to predict intracranial hypertension in severe traumatic brain injury.一种用于预测严重创伤性脑损伤患者颅内高压的临床决策规则。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Sep 28;131(2):612-619. doi: 10.3171/2018.4.JNS173166. Print 2019 Aug 1.
2
Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury.估计创伤性脑损伤的全球发病率。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 27;130(4):1080-1097. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352. Print 2019 Apr 1.
3
Complications of cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤减压性颅骨切除术后颅骨修补的并发症
Br J Neurosurg. 2016;30(2):264-8. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1054356. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
4
Increased mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated without intracranial pressure monitoring.未行颅内压监测的严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率增高。
J Neurosurg. 2012 Oct;117(4):729-34. doi: 10.3171/2012.7.JNS111816. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
5
Conventional neurocritical care and cerebral oxygenation after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后的传统神经重症监护与脑氧合
J Neurosurg. 2006 Oct;105(4):568-75. doi: 10.3171/jns.2006.105.4.568.
6
Monitoring of head injured patients.头部受伤患者的监测。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Oct;18(5):477-83. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000183107.19673.ed.
7
Reduced mortality rate in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated with brain tissue oxygen monitoring.采用脑组织氧监测治疗的重度创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率降低。
J Neurosurg. 2005 Nov;103(5):805-11. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.103.5.0805.
8
Correlation between intra-abdominal and intracranial pressure in nontraumatic brain injury.非创伤性脑损伤中腹腔内压与颅内压的相关性
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Nov;31(11):1577-81. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2802-2. Epub 2005 Sep 29.
9
Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice.神经外科手术中脑室液压力的连续记录与控制。
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1960;36(149):1-193.
10
Epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries: Indian scenario.创伤性脑损伤的流行病学:印度情况
Neurol Res. 2002 Jan;24(1):24-8. doi: 10.1179/016164102101199503.