Xu En-Wen, Wang Hua-Chun, Mao Zhong-Qi
Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Department of General Surgery, Public Health Clinical Center Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024 Mar;19(1):42-51. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2024.134832. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
The dissection of the preperitoneal space is performed using a monopolar instrument to prevent bleeding in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP). It may also cause energy injuries and nerve damage.
To assess the effectiveness and safety of dissection of the preperitoneal space without electrocoagulation (DPSWE) in TAPP throughout the process.
A retrospective analysis of data of 134 patients was made. The electrocoagulation group (EG) relied on monopolar instruments. In the non-electrocoagulation group (NEG) mainly scissors were used without electrocoagulation. The patients were followed for up for 3 months. Intraoperative and postoperative conditions and other complications were observed.
The VAS scores in the NEG were lower than those in the EG (p < 0.05). The operation time in the NEG was shorter than that in the EG (p < 0.05). Hospitalization expenses, scrotal seroma formation, and rupture of hernia sac in the NEG were lower than those in the EG (p < 0.05). The intraoperative bleeding volume above 20 ml in the NEG was higher than that in the EG. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative bleeding, vas deferens injury, intestinal injury, surgical site infection, length of hospital stay, urinary retention and hernia recurrence in the NEG and the EG (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in the NEG and the EG.
DPSWE is effective and safe. DPSWE may reduce postoperative pain and have no significant increase in postoperative bleeding.
在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)中,使用单极器械进行腹膜前间隙的分离以防止出血。但这也可能导致能量损伤和神经损伤。
评估在TAPP全过程中不使用电凝进行腹膜前间隙分离(DPSWE)的有效性和安全性。
对134例患者的数据进行回顾性分析。电凝组(EG)依赖单极器械。非电凝组(NEG)主要使用剪刀且不使用电凝。对患者进行3个月的随访。观察术中、术后情况及其他并发症。
NEG组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)低于EG组(p < 0.05)。NEG组的手术时间短于EG组(p < 0.05)。NEG组的住院费用、阴囊血清肿形成及疝囊破裂情况低于EG组(p < 0.05)。NEG组术中出血量超过20 ml的情况高于EG组。NEG组和EG组在术后出血、输精管损伤、肠损伤、手术部位感染、住院时间、尿潴留及疝复发的发生率上无显著差异(p > 0.05)。NEG组和EG组手术部位感染(SSIs)的发生率无显著差异。
DPSWE有效且安全。DPSWE可减轻术后疼痛且术后出血无显著增加。