• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉搭桥手术患者移植失败1年随访后的预防性药物疗效:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析

Preventive medication efficacy after 1-year follow-up for graft failure in coronary artery bypass surgery patients: Bayesian network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Uimonen Mikko, Liukkonen Rasmus, Ponkilainen Ville, Vaajala Matias, Tarkiainen Jeremias, Pakarinen Oskari, Haapanen Marjut, Kuitunen Ilari

机构信息

Tampere University Hospital, Heart Hospital, Elämänaukio 1, 33520 Tampere, Finland.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Jun 27;4(4):oeae052. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae052. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oeae052
PMID:38974873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11227230/
Abstract

To compare preventive medications against graft failures in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) patients after a 1-year follow-up. Systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in February 2023 for randomized controlled trials, comparing preventive medications against graft failure in CABG patients. We included studies that reported outcomes at 1 year after surgery. Our primary outcome was graft failure After screening 11,898 studies, a total of 18 randomized trials were included. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) [odds ratios (OR) 0.51, 95% credibility interval (CrI) 0.28-0.95, meta-regression OR 0.54, 95% CrI 0.26-1.00], Clopidogrel + ASA (OR 0.27, 95% CrI 0.09-0.76, meta-regression OR 0.28, 95% CrI 0.09-0.85), dipyridamole + ASA (OR 0.50, 95% CrI 0.30-0.83, meta-regression OR 0.49, 95% CrI 0.26-0.90), ticagrelor (OR 0.40, 95% CrI 0.16-1.00, meta-regression OR 0.43, 95% CrI 0.15-1.2), and ticagrelor + ASA (OR 0.26, 95% CrI 0.10-0.62, meta-regression OR 0.28, 95% CrI 0.10-0.68) were superior to placebo in preventing graft failure. Rank probabilities suggested the highest likelihood to be the most efficacious for ticagrelor + ASA [surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) 0.859] and clopidogrel + ASA (SUCRA 0.819). The 95% CrIs of ORs for mortality, bleeding, and major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACE) were wide. A trend towards increased bleeding risk and decreased MACE risk was observed when any of the medication regimens were used when compared to placebo. Sensitivity analysis excluding studies with a high risk of bias yielded equivalent results. Of the reviewed medication regimens, dual antiplatelet therapy combining ASA with ticagrelor or clopidogrel was found to result in the lowest rate of graft failures.

摘要

为比较冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者术后1年预防移植失败的药物。采用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析进行系统评价。我们于2023年2月在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中检索了比较CABG患者预防移植失败药物的随机对照试验。我们纳入了报告术后1年结果的研究。我们的主要结局是移植失败。在筛选了11898项研究后,共纳入18项随机试验。阿司匹林(ASA)[比值比(OR)0.51,95%可信区间(CrI)0.28 - 0.95,荟萃回归OR 0.54,95% CrI 0.26 - 1.00]、氯吡格雷 + ASA(OR 0.27,95% CrI 0.09 - 0.76,荟萃回归OR 0.28,95% CrI 0.09 - 0.85)、双嘧达莫 + ASA(OR 0.50,95% CrI 0.30 - 0.83,荟萃回归OR 0.49,95% CrI 0.26 - 0.90)、替格瑞洛(OR 0.40,95% CrI 0.16 - 1.00,荟萃回归OR 0.43,95% CrI 0.15 - 1.2)以及替格瑞洛 + ASA(OR 0.26,95% CrI 0.10 - 0.62,荟萃回归OR 0.28,95% CrI 0.10 - 0.68)在预防移植失败方面优于安慰剂。排序概率表明替格瑞洛 + ASA[累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)0.859]和氯吡格雷 + ASA(SUCRA 0.819)最有可能是最有效的。死亡率、出血和主要不良心脑血管事件(MACE)的OR的95% CrI较宽。与安慰剂相比,使用任何一种药物方案时,均观察到出血风险增加和MACE风险降低的趋势。排除偏倚风险高的研究的敏感性分析得出了等效结果。在所审查的药物方案中,发现ASA与替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷联合的双联抗血小板治疗导致移植失败率最低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/de4730c18f86/oeae052f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/9f12f8a00374/oeae052f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/b188f20af914/oeae052f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/207ac33f970c/oeae052f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/76f8b33ee92c/oeae052f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/33994ae850ea/oeae052f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/1a41fa337f11/oeae052f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/41d6c134681e/oeae052f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/05bb7c21d380/oeae052f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/de4730c18f86/oeae052f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/9f12f8a00374/oeae052f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/b188f20af914/oeae052f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/207ac33f970c/oeae052f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/76f8b33ee92c/oeae052f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/33994ae850ea/oeae052f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/1a41fa337f11/oeae052f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/41d6c134681e/oeae052f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/05bb7c21d380/oeae052f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11227230/de4730c18f86/oeae052f9.jpg

相似文献

1
Preventive medication efficacy after 1-year follow-up for graft failure in coronary artery bypass surgery patients: Bayesian network meta-analysis.冠状动脉搭桥手术患者移植失败1年随访后的预防性药物疗效:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Jun 27;4(4):oeae052. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae052. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Antiplatelet therapy and coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗血小板治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Sep 1;31(3):354-363. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa115.
3
Network meta-analysis of antiplatelet therapy following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG): none versus one versus two antiplatelet agents.冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后抗血小板治疗的网络荟萃分析:无抗血小板药物与一种抗血小板药物与两种抗血小板药物的比较
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Sep;7(5):577-585. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.09.02.
4
Bleeding risk in patients prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy and triple therapy after coronary interventions: the ADAPTT retrospective population-based cohort studies.接受冠状动脉介入治疗后接受双联抗血小板治疗和三联治疗的患者的出血风险:ADAPTT 回顾性基于人群的队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 May;27(8):1-257. doi: 10.3310/MNJY9014.
5
A Meta-Analysis Comparing Aspirin Alone Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for the Prevention of Venous Graft Failure Following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.一项比较单独应用阿司匹林与双联抗血小板治疗预防冠状动脉旁路移植术后静脉移植物失败的荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Jun;21(6):792-796. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.10.022. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
6
Comparison of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in Addition to Aspirin in Patients With Minor Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Network Meta-analysis.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗轻型缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者的比较:一项网状荟萃分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Feb 1;79(2):141-148. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4514.
7
Antithrombotic Therapy for Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.抗栓治疗症状性外周动脉疾病:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2022 Aug;82(12):1287-1302. doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01756-6. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
8
Antiplatelet agents for preventing thrombosis after peripheral arterial bypass surgery.用于预防外周动脉搭桥术后血栓形成的抗血小板药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 19;2015(2):CD000535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000535.pub3.
9
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的降阶梯治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):171-186. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112476.
10
Comparison efficacy and safety of different antiplatelet or anticoagulation drugs in chronic coronary syndromes patients: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.比较不同抗血小板或抗凝药物在慢性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效和安全性:一项贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 1;102(48):e36429. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036429.

本文引用的文献

1
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.
2
2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2023 年 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA 慢性冠状动脉疾病患者管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2023 Aug 29;148(9):e9-e119. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001168. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
3
A Randomized Trial of Clopidogrel vs Ticagrelor After Off-Pump Coronary Bypass.
非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛的随机试验。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 May;115(5):1127-1134. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.10.040. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
4
Randomized evidence on graft patency after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: An updated meta-analysis.随机对照试验关于非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后桥血管通畅率的证据:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2022 Feb;98:106212. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106212. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
5
Ticagrelor versus aspirin and vein graft patency after coronary bypass: A randomized trial.替格瑞洛与阿司匹林及冠状动脉旁路移植术后静脉桥通畅率:一项随机试验。
J Card Surg. 2022 Mar;37(3):563-570. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16189. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
6
Saphenous Vein Graft Failure: From Pathophysiology to Prevention and Treatment Strategies.隐静脉移植物失败:从病理生理学到预防和治疗策略。
Circulation. 2021 Aug 31;144(9):728-745. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052163. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
7
Aspirin plus ticagrelor or clopidogrel on graft patency one year after coronary bypass grafting: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial.冠状动脉搭桥术后一年阿司匹林联合替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷对移植血管通畅率的影响:一项单中心、随机、对照试验
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Mar;13(3):1697-1705. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3407.
8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
9
Effect of Adding Ticagrelor to Standard Aspirin on Saphenous Vein Graft Patency in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (POPular CABG): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.替格瑞洛联合标准阿司匹林对冠状动脉旁路移植术患者隐静脉桥通畅率的影响(POPular CABG):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Circulation. 2020 Nov 10;142(19):1799-1807. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050749. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
10
Antiplatelet therapy and coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗血小板治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Sep 1;31(3):354-363. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa115.