• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析面包生产的可持续性:能量、火用和环境足迹的生命周期评估方法。

Analyzing sustainability in bread production: a life cycle assessment approach to energy, exergy and environmental footprint.

机构信息

Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jul;31(34):46949-46964. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34121-z. Epub 2024 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-024-34121-z
PMID:38977553
Abstract

Bread production is a pivotal component of global nutrition. However, its extensive production imposes significant strain on resources and energy, resulting in substantial environmental consequences. This study focuses on a multidimensional assessment of the environmental sustainability of the bread life cycle as a case study in Iran. By integrating four life cycle assessment (LCA) methods, this research demonstrates a comprehensive analysis of environmental effects, energy consumption, and exergy demand in bread production. It also identifies the hotspot stages and inputs within the bread production chain. Eventually, it proposes strategies for mitigating the environmental impacts in line with sustainable development goals. Data collection involved questionnaires by face-to-face interviews. The LCA evaluation was conducted using SimaPro software. Sustainability analysis was assessed using four different methods: CML, ReCiPe, cumulative energy demand (CED), and cumulative exergy demand (CExD) method, from cradle to bakery gate. The CML method results indicate that the highest environmental impacts are associated with marine aquatic ecotoxicity (157.04 to 193.36 kg 1,4-DB eq), fossil fuel depletion (11.05 to 12.73 MJ), eutrophication (4.20 × 10 to 4.70 × 10 kg PO eq), acidification (8.09 × 10 to 9.16 × 10 kg SO eq), and global warming (0.61 to 0.69 kg CO eq). The ReCiPe method highlights wheat production stages and gas consumption as the most significant contributors to damage in terms of human health, ecosystems, and resource consumption indicators. The CED method reveals that fossil energy accounts for over 97% of the energy consumed during the bread life cycle. Energy consumption per kilogram of bread ranges from 12.07 to 13.93 MJ. The CExD method for producing 1 kg of traditional bread falls between 32.25 and 35.88 MJ. More than 60% of this value is attributed to renewable resources of water used in irrigation during the wheat farming stage, while over 35% is linked to non-renewable fossil resources, primarily due to the consumption of natural gas in bakery operations. To assess the potential decrease in environmental emissions, a sensitivity analysis was performed, considering the effects of substituting natural gas with biogas and grid electricity with photovoltaic electricity in the bakery. Then, three improved scenarios were developed, each demonstrating effective reductions in environmental impacts, with the most remarkable decreases observed in marine aquatic ecotoxicity (55%) and fossil fuel depletion (44%). Overall, the findings demonstrate that Sangak bread production exhibits a more environmentally friendly profile than other types of bread. These results can guide decision-makers in the bread production industry towards implementing sustainable practices that prioritize resource efficiency and environmental conservation. Also, stakeholders can develop strategies to reduce the environmental impacts and work towards a more sustainable future.

摘要

面包生产是全球营养的关键组成部分。然而,其广泛的生产对资源和能源造成了巨大的压力,导致了严重的环境后果。本研究以伊朗的面包生命周期为例,对其环境可持续性进行了多维评估。本研究通过整合四种生命周期评估 (LCA) 方法,全面分析了面包生产过程中的环境影响、能源消耗和火用需求,并确定了面包生产链中的热点阶段和投入。最终,根据可持续发展目标提出了减轻环境影响的策略。数据收集包括通过面对面访谈的问卷调查。LCA 评估使用 SimaPro 软件进行。可持续性分析使用了四种不同的方法进行评估:摇篮到面包店门的 CML、ReCiPe、累积能源需求 (CED) 和累积火用需求 (CExD) 方法。CML 方法的结果表明,最高的环境影响与海洋水生生态毒性(157.04 到 193.36 公斤 1,4-DB eq)、化石燃料枯竭(11.05 到 12.73 兆焦耳)、富营养化(4.20×10 到 4.70×10 公斤 PO eq)、酸化(8.09×10 到 9.16×10 公斤 SO eq)和全球变暖(0.61 到 0.69 公斤 CO eq)有关。ReCiPe 方法强调小麦生产阶段和天然气消耗是对人类健康、生态系统和资源消耗指标造成损害的最重要因素。CED 方法表明,在面包生命周期中,化石能源占所消耗能源的 97%以上。每公斤面包的能耗在 12.07 到 13.93 兆焦耳之间。生产 1 公斤传统面包的 CExD 方法介于 32.25 到 35.88 兆焦耳之间。这个数值的 60%以上归因于小麦种植阶段灌溉用水的可再生资源,而 35%以上归因于不可再生的化石资源,主要是由于面包店运营中消耗的天然气。为了评估环境排放减少的潜力,进行了敏感性分析,考虑了在面包店用沼气替代天然气和用光伏电力替代电网电力的影响。然后,开发了三个改进方案,每个方案都有效地降低了环境影响,其中海洋水生生态毒性(55%)和化石燃料枯竭(44%)的降幅最为显著。总体而言,研究结果表明, Sangak 面包生产比其他类型的面包更具环境友好性。这些结果可以为面包生产行业的决策者提供指导,使其采取优先考虑资源效率和环境保护的可持续实践。此外,利益相关者可以制定策略来减少环境影响,为更可持续的未来而努力。

相似文献

1
Analyzing sustainability in bread production: a life cycle assessment approach to energy, exergy and environmental footprint.分析面包生产的可持续性:能量、火用和环境足迹的生命周期评估方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jul;31(34):46949-46964. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34121-z. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
2
Developing a carbon footprint model and environmental impact analysis of municipal solid waste transportation: A case study of Tehran, Iran.开发城市固体废物运输的碳足迹模型和环境影响分析:以伊朗德黑兰为例。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2023 Dec;73(12):890-901. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2023.2271424. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
3
Life cycle environmental sustainability and cumulative energy assessment of biomass pellets biofuel derived from agroforest residues.农林剩余物生物质颗粒生物燃料的生命周期环境可持续性和累积能源评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0275005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275005. eCollection 2022.
4
Environmental sustainability assessment of softwood and hardwood seedlings production in forest nurseries: A case study from Pakistan.森林苗圃中软木和硬木幼苗生产的环境可持续性评估:来自巴基斯坦的案例研究。
Braz J Biol. 2022 May 9;84:e260615. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.260615. eCollection 2022.
5
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
6
Precision feeding as a tool to reduce the environmental footprint of pig production systems: a life-cycle assessment.精准饲养作为减少猪生产系统环境足迹的工具:生命周期评估。
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae225.
7
Life cycle assessment of rice production systems in different paddy field size levels in north of Iran.伊朗北部不同稻田规模水平下水稻生产系统的生命周期评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Mar 2;191(4):202. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7344-0.
8
Environmental sustainability assessment of biodiesel production from Jatropha curcas L. seeds oil in Pakistan.巴基斯坦麻疯树籽油生物柴油生产的环境可持续性评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0258409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258409. eCollection 2021.
9
Environmental impacts, water footprint and cumulative energy demand of match industry in Pakistan.巴基斯坦火柴行业的环境影响、水足迹和累计能源需求。
PLoS One. 2021 May 20;16(5):e0251928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251928. eCollection 2021.
10
Life cycle environmental impacts of saffron production in Iran.伊朗藏红花生产的生命周期环境影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Feb;24(5):4812-4821. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-8228-2. Epub 2016 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative Prediction of Protein Content in Corn Kernel Based on Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.基于近红外光谱法的玉米粒蛋白质含量定量预测
Foods. 2024 Dec 23;13(24):4173. doi: 10.3390/foods13244173.