Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2024 Nov;34(11):1146-1153. doi: 10.1111/pan.14965. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
This study aimed to assess the impact of positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the non-hypoxic apnea time in infants during anesthesia induction with an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8.
This age stratified randomized controlled trial included patients under 1 year of age. Preoxygenation was performed using an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 for 2 min. Inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 was administered via a face mask with volume-controlled ventilation at a tidal volume of 6 mL.kg, with or without 7 cmHO of PEEP. Tracheal intubation was performed after 3 min of ventilation; however, it was disconnected from the breathing circuit. Ventilation was resumed once the pulse oximetry readings reached 95%. The primary outcome was the non-hypoxic apnea time, defined as the time from the cessation of ventilation to achieving a pulse oximeter reading of 95%. The secondary outcome measures included the degree of atelectasis assessed by ultrasonography and the presence of gastric air insufflation.
Eighty-four patients were included in the final analysis. In the positive end-expiratory pressure group, the atelectasis score decreased (17.0 vs. 31.5, p < .001; mean difference and 95% CI of 11.6, 7.5-15.6), while the non-hypoxic apnea time increased (80.1 s vs. 70.6 s, p = .005; mean difference and 95% CI of -9.4, -16.0 to -2.9), compared to the zero end-expiratory pressure group, among infants who are 6 months old or younger, not in those aged older than 6 months.
The application of positive end-expiratory pressure reduced the incidence of atelectasis and extended the non-hypoxic apnea time in infants who are 6 months old or younger. However, it did not affect the incidence of atelectasis nor the non-hypoxic apnea time in patients aged older than 6 months.
本研究旨在评估在 0.8 吸入氧分数麻醉诱导期间,呼气末正压(PEEP)对婴儿非缺氧性呼吸暂停时间的影响。
这是一项年龄分层随机对照试验,纳入年龄在 1 岁以下的患者。预充氧采用 0.8 吸入氧分数 2 分钟。通过面罩给予 0.8 吸入氧分数,容量控制通气,潮气量 6mL/kg,加或不加 7cmH2O 的 PEEP。通气 3 分钟后行气管插管,但与呼吸回路断开。一旦脉搏血氧饱和度读数达到 95%,则恢复通气。主要结局是无低氧性呼吸暂停时间,定义为从停止通气到达到脉搏血氧饱和度读数 95%的时间。次要结局指标包括超声评估的肺不张程度和胃充气。
84 例患者最终进入分析。在呼气末正压组,肺不张评分降低(17.0 分比 31.5 分,p<0.001;平均差异及 95%CI 为 11.6,7.5-15.6),而无低氧性呼吸暂停时间延长(80.1s 比 70.6s,p=0.005;平均差异及 95%CI 为-9.4,-16.0 至-2.9),与呼气末正压组相比,6 个月或以下婴儿,6 个月以上婴儿无差异。
呼气末正压的应用降低了 6 个月或以下婴儿的肺不张发生率,并延长了无低氧性呼吸暂停时间。然而,它对 6 个月以上婴儿的肺不张发生率或无低氧性呼吸暂停时间无影响。