• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运输团队到达儿童床边的时间与入院后30天死亡率之间的关系。

Relation between the time of the transport team in reaching the bedside of children and the 30-day mortality rate after admission.

作者信息

Tang Mingxing, Sheng Yao, Jin Danqun

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Anhui Children's Hospital, Hefei, China.

出版信息

Transl Pediatr. 2024 Jun 30;13(6):931-937. doi: 10.21037/tp-24-164. Epub 2024 Jun 25.

DOI:10.21037/tp-24-164
PMID:38984027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11228898/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

China's medical system has not yet issued quality control indicators related to the transfer of critically ill children, and when transport teams receive a transfer request for these children, due to various reasons, the time to arrive at the bedside varies. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the time taken by the pediatric intensive care transport team to reach the bedside of children after receiving a transport request on the prognosis of these children.

METHODS

Clinical data of 298 critically ill children admitted to Anhui Children's Hospital through long-distance transport from March 2020 to February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Pediatric patients were divided into three groups according to the time taken by the transport team to reach the bedside after receipt of a transport request: the ≤60, >60 to ≤180, and >180 min groups. The 30-day mortality of children after admission (0= no, 1= yes) was used as the dependent variable for multivariate logistic regression analysis, with the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) indicating the relation between the time taken by the transport team to reach the bedside and the 30-day mortality rate after admission. P<0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 298 children for whom transports were requested, 50 (16.8%) of whom died within 30 days after admission. The limited evidence revealed that the time taken by the transport team to reach the bedside of children was not significantly related to the 30-day mortality rate after admission in Anhui Children's Hospital (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The time taken by the transport team to reach the bedside of children is not associated with the 30-day mortality rate after admission into the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

摘要

背景

中国医疗系统尚未发布与危重症儿童转运相关的质量控制指标,当转运团队接到这些儿童的转运请求时,由于各种原因,到达床边的时间各不相同。本研究的目的是调查儿科重症监护转运团队在接到转运请求后到达儿童床边所花费的时间对这些儿童预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2020年3月至2022年2月通过长途转运入住安徽儿童医院的298例危重症儿童的临床资料。根据转运团队接到转运请求后到达床边所花费的时间,将儿科患者分为三组:≤60分钟组、>60至≤180分钟组和>180分钟组。将入院后儿童的30天死亡率(0=否,1=是)作为多因素logistic回归分析的因变量,优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)表示转运团队到达床边所花费的时间与入院后30天死亡率之间的关系。P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

在研究期间,有298名儿童被请求转运,其中50名(16.8%)在入院后30天内死亡。有限的证据显示,转运团队到达儿童床边所花费的时间与安徽儿童医院入院后30天死亡率无显著相关性(P>0.05)。

结论

转运团队到达儿童床边所花费的时间与入住儿科重症监护病房(PICU)后30天死亡率无关。

相似文献

1
Relation between the time of the transport team in reaching the bedside of children and the 30-day mortality rate after admission.运输团队到达儿童床边的时间与入院后30天死亡率之间的关系。
Transl Pediatr. 2024 Jun 30;13(6):931-937. doi: 10.21037/tp-24-164. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
2
Does time taken by paediatric critical care transport teams to reach the bedside of critically ill children affect survival? A retrospective cohort study from England and Wales.儿科重症监护转运团队到达病危儿童床边所需的时间是否会影响生存率?来自英格兰和威尔士的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02195-6.
3
Epidemiology of Pediatric Critical Care Transport in Northern Alberta and the Western Arctic.加拿大艾伯塔省北部和西部北极地区儿科危重病救治转运的流行病学研究。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;19(6):e279-e285. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001491.
4
Interhospital Transport of Critically Ill Children to PICUs in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland: Analysis of an International Dataset.英国和爱尔兰共和国儿科重症监护病房之间危重症儿童的医院间转运:国际数据集分析。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;19(6):e300-e311. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001506.
5
6
Hospital outcomes of children admitted to intensive care in British Columbia via interfacility transfer versus direct admission from 2015 to 2017: a descriptive analysis.2015 年至 2017 年不列颠哥伦比亚省通过设施间转院和直接入院收治重症监护病房儿童的医院结局:描述性分析。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Jun 1;9(2):E602-E606. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200263. Print 2021 Apr-Jun.
7
Direct vs. redirected admission of critically ill children to PICU after interfacility transfer: a retrospective cohort study.危重症儿童院间转运后直接与间接入住儿科重症监护病房的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Pediatr. 2024 Feb 16;12:1307565. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1307565. eCollection 2024.
8
Pretransport Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score underestimates the requirement for intensive care or major interventions during interhospital transport.院间转运期间,院前小儿死亡风险(PRISM)评分低估了重症监护或重大干预措施的需求。
Crit Care Med. 1994 Jan;22(1):101-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199401000-00020.
9
Parental Presence at the Bedside of Critically Ill Children in a Unit With Unrestricted Visitation.父母在限制探视的重症儿童病房陪伴床边。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Aug;19(8):e387-e393. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001597.
10
The Relationship Between Remoteness and Outcomes in Critically Ill Children.危重病儿童的距离与结局的关系。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov;18(11):e514-e520. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001318.

本文引用的文献

1
[Management of helicopter medical transport in 36 patients with critical cardiac disease].[36例重症心脏病患者的直升机医疗转运管理]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Feb;35(2):201-205. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20211112-01707.
2
Helicopter versus ground ambulance transport for interfacility transfer of critically ill children.直升机与地面救护车在危重症儿童机构间转运中的比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Nov;61:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.08.032. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
3
Does time taken by paediatric critical care transport teams to reach the bedside of critically ill children affect survival? A retrospective cohort study from England and Wales.
儿科重症监护转运团队到达病危儿童床边所需的时间是否会影响生存率?来自英格兰和威尔士的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02195-6.
4
Modelling the allocation of paediatric intensive care retrieval teams in England and Wales.模拟英格兰和威尔士儿科重症监护取回团队的分配。
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Oct;104(10):962-966. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316056. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
5
Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Third Edition: Update of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines, Executive Summary.儿童严重创伤性脑损伤管理指南,第三版:脑外伤基金会指南更新,执行摘要。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;20(3):280-289. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001736.
6
The American College of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Parameters for Hemodynamic Support of Pediatric and Neonatal Septic Shock: Executive Summary.美国危重病医学会《儿科和新生儿感染性休克血流动力学支持临床实践参数:执行摘要》
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;18(9):884-890. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001259.
7
Impact of Retrieval, Distance Traveled, and Referral Center on Outcomes in Unplanned Admissions to a National PICU.检索、转运距离及转诊中心对全国性儿科重症监护病房非计划入院结局的影响
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;17(2):e34-42. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000586.
8
Quality Metrics in Neonatal and Pediatric Critical Care Transport: A National Delphi Project.新生儿及儿科重症监护转运中的质量指标:一项全国性德尔菲项目
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct;16(8):711-7. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000477.
9
[Development and applications of pediatric early warning score].[儿童早期预警评分的发展与应用]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;52(9):712-4.
10
Quality metrics in neonatal and pediatric critical care transport: a consensus statement.新生儿和儿科危重症转运中的质量指标:共识声明。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun;14(5):518-24. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31828a7fc1.