Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;19(6):e279-e285. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001491.
Specialized pediatric critical care transport teams are essential to pediatric retrieval systems. This study aims to describe the contemporary transports performed by a Canadian pediatric critical care transport team and to compare the treatment and outcomes of children referred from high-level care (hospitals offering pediatric services where an adult ICU exists) and nonhigh-level care (all other hospitals) hospitals.
A descriptive cohort study.
The Stollery Children's Hospital in Edmonton, Alberta, Western Canada.
Children younger than 17 years old transported by the transport team from referral hospitals within the Stollery Children's Hospital catchment area to Stollery Children's Hospital between 1998 and 2015.
None.
Characteristics of transports, patient demographics presenting vital signs, and outcomes were described overall and compared by transport-related time and referral hospital types (high-level care and nonhigh-level care). In total, 3,352 transports met the inclusion criteria; 1,049 were retrieved from eight high-level care hospitals and 2,303 from 53 nonhigh-level care hospitals; the median one-way transport distance was 383 kilometers, and 70% of the transports were air transports. The annual number of transports has increased during the study period. The PICU admission rate was between 40% and 55%. Transports from high-level care hospitals had significantly higher odds of being admitted to the PICU (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.31-2.93). The odds of intubation at the referral hospital were higher in the high-level care group, but the odds of intubation upon PICU admission was similar between the two groups. Mortality during or after transport was not significantly different between high-level care and nonhigh-level care hospitals.
The current transport system has multiple priorities with regard to efficiency and quality. The medical services at referral hospitals may affect the likelihood of PICU admission and subsequent PICU length of stay; however, no negative impact was observed in other outcomes including mortality.
专门的儿科重症监护转运团队对于儿科转运系统至关重要。本研究旨在描述加拿大儿科重症监护转运团队进行的当代转运,并比较从高级护理(提供儿科服务且设有成人 ICU 的医院)和非高级护理(所有其他医院)医院转来的患儿的治疗和结局。
描述性队列研究。
加拿大艾伯塔省埃德蒙顿市的斯特罗利儿童医院。
1998 年至 2015 年间,由转运团队从斯特罗利儿童医院服务范围内的转诊医院转运至斯特罗利儿童医院的年龄小于 17 岁的儿童。
无。
总体描述了转运的特征、患者的人口统计学特征、生命体征以及结局,并按转运相关时间和转诊医院类型(高级护理和非高级护理)进行了比较。共有 3352 次转运符合纳入标准;其中 1049 次来自 8 家高级护理医院,2303 次来自 53 家非高级护理医院;单向转运距离中位数为 383 公里,70%的转运为空中转运。研究期间,每年的转运次数有所增加。PICU 入院率在 40%至 55%之间。来自高级护理医院的转运被收治到 PICU 的可能性显著更高(优势比,1.96;95%置信区间,1.31-2.93)。高级护理组在转诊医院行气管插管的可能性更高,但两组患儿在 PICU 入院时行气管插管的可能性相似。高级护理和非高级护理医院之间,在转运过程中或之后的死亡率没有显著差异。
目前的转运系统在效率和质量方面有多个优先级。转诊医院的医疗服务可能会影响 PICU 入院的可能性和随后的 PICU 住院时间;但是,在其他结局方面,包括死亡率,没有观察到负面影响。