Department of Psychology, School of the Social Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Psychiatric Department, 424 General Military Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2024 Aug;46(6):599-613. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2024.2376839. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
Interest in teleneuropsychology services increased considerably after the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the utility of unsupervised administration of computerized tests remains largely unexplored. In the present study, we developed a brief computerized battery that assesses self-reported cognitive abilities and performances on executive functioning and verbal memory. We investigated the equivalence of the self-administration online (SAO) procedure and the face-to-face (FTF) administration. Preliminary normative data were developed and the acceptance of the SAO procedure was explored.
A community sample of 169 Greek adults [94 women; mean age: 41.95 (SD = 13.40) years, mean years of education: 15.10 (SD = 2.65)] completed the SAO assessment. A subgroup of 40 participants was tested in a counterbalanced way both with SAO and FTF. Participants' performances were compared with paired sample -tests and the agreement between the two methods was estimated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Multiple linear regression analyses were applied to investigate the effect of demographic characteristics on SAO measures.
No difference between SAO and FTF scores was observed. ICCs indicated moderate to good agreement (.418-.848) for most measures. Age was positively associated with self-reported cognitive state and negatively with neuropsychological performances and the level of acceptance of the SAO procedure. Approximately 80% of participants reported satisfaction from the SAO assessment, 69% good compliance with the instructions, but less than 30% belief that the FTF assessment could be adequately replaced.
SAO testing is feasible and well accepted among Greek adults yielding equivalent results with FTF testing. Despite the wide satisfaction, though, notable reluctance was noted for the substitution of FTF with SAO procedures.
新冠疫情大流行后,人们对远程神经心理学服务的兴趣大大增加。然而,计算机化测试的无人监管管理的效用在很大程度上仍未得到探索。在本研究中,我们开发了一个简短的计算机化电池,评估自我报告的认知能力以及执行功能和言语记忆的表现。我们研究了在线自我管理(SAO)程序和面对面(FTF)管理的等效性。初步制定了规范数据,并探讨了 SAO 程序的接受程度。
一个由 169 名希腊成年人组成的社区样本[94 名女性;平均年龄:41.95(SD=13.40)岁,平均受教育年限:15.10(SD=2.65)]完成了 SAO 评估。40 名参与者的亚组以平衡方式同时进行了 SAO 和 FTF 测试。使用配对样本 t 检验比较参与者的表现,使用组内相关系数(ICC)估计两种方法之间的一致性。应用多元线性回归分析来研究人口统计学特征对 SAO 测量的影响。
SAO 和 FTF 评分之间没有差异。ICC 表明大多数指标的一致性为中等至良好(.418-.848)。年龄与自我报告的认知状态呈正相关,与神经心理学表现和 SAO 程序的接受程度呈负相关。大约 80%的参与者对 SAO 评估表示满意,69%的人对指令的依从性较好,但不到 30%的人认为 FTF 评估可以充分替代。
SAO 测试在希腊成年人中是可行且易于接受的,与 FTF 测试产生等效的结果。尽管满意度很高,但对于用 SAO 程序替代 FTF 程序,人们仍明显犹豫不决。