Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, Jiangsu, China.
Orthopaedics Institute, Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, Jiangsu, China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Oct 21;19(1):676. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05168-y.
This study aimed to (1) analyze the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), (2) assess whether UKA can restore pre-arthritic coronal alignment by utilizing the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), and (3) evaluate the relationship between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and postoperative alignment following UKA.
We retrospectively analyzed 152 consecutive patients who underwent fixed-bearing medial UKA. A radiological analysis was conducted using an EOS imaging system. Postoperative alignment was classified as neutral (varus ≤ 3°), mild varus (3° < varus ≤ 7°), or marked varus (varus > 7°) based on the mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA). The aHKA was calculated and the CPAK classification was used to categorize knee phenotypes. The PROMs were obtained both before and after the surgery.
A total of 152 knees from 113 patients were included with a mean two-year follow-up. The mean difference between the postoperative mHKA and the estimated aHKA was 0.80° (90% CI 0.35 to 1.24; P = 0.003). Postoperatively, 63 (41.45%) of the 152 knees were in neutral group, 54 (35.53%) mild varus, and 35 (23.03%) marked varus. The neutrally aligned cohort did not exhibit significantly higher scores in range of motion, VAS, HSS, WOMAC, or FJS-12 scores compared to the mild or marked varus cohort (P = 0.205, 0.118, 0.076, 0.140, and 0.788, respectively) during the short-term follow-up.
Non-robotically assisted, fixed-bearing medial UKA can restore pre-arthritic coronal alignment and achieve satisfactory PROMs. Fixed-bearing medial UKA aims to restore the pre-arthritic alignment rather than achieving neutral mechanical alignment.
本研究旨在:(1)分析行单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)患者的冠状面膝关节对线(CPAK)分类;(2)利用算术髋膝踝角(aHKA)评估 UKA 是否可以恢复关节炎前的冠状对线;(3)评估 UKA 后患者报告的结果测量(PROM)与术后对线之间的关系。
我们回顾性分析了 152 例连续接受固定衬垫内侧 UKA 的患者。使用 EOS 成像系统进行放射学分析。根据机械髋膝踝角(mHKA),术后对线分为中立位(内翻≤3°)、轻度内翻(3°<内翻≤7°)或重度内翻(内翻>7°)。计算 aHKA 并使用 CPAK 分类来分类膝关节表型。在手术前后获得 PROM。
共纳入 113 例患者的 152 个膝关节,平均随访 2 年。术后 mHKA 与估计 aHKA 之间的平均差异为 0.80°(90%CI 0.35 至 1.24;P=0.003)。术后,152 个膝关节中有 63 个(41.45%)处于中立位,54 个(35.53%)轻度内翻,35 个(23.03%)重度内翻。与轻度或重度内翻组相比,中立对线组在短期随访中在活动范围、VAS、HSS、WOMAC 或 FJS-12 评分方面没有表现出明显更高的评分(P=0.205、0.118、0.076、0.140 和 0.788)。
非机器人辅助、固定衬垫内侧 UKA 可以恢复关节炎前的冠状对线并获得满意的 PROM。固定衬垫内侧 UKA 的目的是恢复关节炎前的对线,而不是实现机械中立对线。