Suppr超能文献

一个或多个标签?一项纵向定性研究,探讨患者在 NHS 体位性心动过速综合征(PoTS)专科诊所就诊的诊断过程。

One or many labels? a longitudinal qualitative study of patients' journey to diagnosis at a specialist NHS Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (PoTS) clinic.

机构信息

Institute of Psychiatry, Health Psychology Section, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jul 10;19(7):e0302723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302723. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (PoTS) is a poorly understood syndrome of multiple disabling symptoms. This study explored the process of seeking a diagnosis of PoTS. Analysis focused on changes before and after participants' first appointment with a national PoTS clinic, and explored whether a diagnosis is beneficial in the context of multiple co-occurring conditions and an absence of licenced treatments.

DESIGN

A longitudinal, qualitative study.

METHODS

Participants (n = 15) in this nested qualitative study were recruited from a larger study of people who had been newly referred to a National specialist NHS Cardiology PoTS service. Semi-structured interviews were conducted remotely before, and 6 months after their first appointment with the clinic. Data was analysed longitudinally and inductively using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.

RESULTS

Three overarching themes were identified: "Slowly moving forward and finding positive gains", "Needing more pieces of the puzzle to see the bigger picture", and "The value and impact of investigations". Findings suggested that not much had changed in the 6 months between interviews. Participants were moving forward in terms of diagnoses, treatment and adjustment following their appointment, but many were still seeking further clarity and possible diagnoses. Investigations, appointments, and new-found problems, continued to have a substantial impact over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The journey to diagnosis for patients with suspected PoTS appeared to promote acceptance of self, and of limitations posed by symptoms. However, many participants continued their search for an explanation for every symptom experience, and this may become increasingly complex, the more labels that have been acquired. Lack of clarity contributed to ongoing difficulties for this patient group alongside fraught relations with health care professionals (HCPs). A more coherent, integrated approach which is communicated clearly to patients is recommended.

摘要

目的

体位性心动过速综合征(PoTS)是一种多系统致残症状但尚未被充分认识的综合征。本研究旨在探讨寻求 PoTS 诊断的过程。分析重点是参与者首次预约国家 PoTS 诊所前后的变化,并探讨在存在多种共病和缺乏许可治疗的情况下,诊断是否有益。

设计

纵向、定性研究。

方法

本嵌套定性研究的参与者(n=15)是从一项新转诊至国家专门 NHS 心脏病学 PoTS 服务的患者的更大研究中招募的。在第一次就诊前和 6 个月后,通过远程进行半结构化访谈。使用反思性主题分析对数据进行纵向和归纳分析。

结果

确定了三个总体主题:“缓慢前进并获得积极收益”、“需要更多的拼图来看到全貌”和“调查的价值和影响”。研究结果表明,两次访谈之间的 6 个月内没有太大变化。在预约后,参与者在诊断、治疗和调整方面都在向前推进,但许多人仍在寻求更多的明确性和可能的诊断。随着时间的推移,调查、预约和新发现的问题继续产生重大影响。

结论

疑似 PoTS 患者的诊断之旅似乎促进了对自身和症状限制的接受。然而,许多参与者继续寻找每个症状体验的解释,并且随着获得的标签越来越多,这种搜索可能会变得越来越复杂。缺乏明确性是导致该患者群体持续困难的原因之一,同时还与医疗保健专业人员(HCP)之间紧张的关系有关。建议采用更具一致性、更具整合性的方法,并向患者清晰传达。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5408/11236186/d3b239ca42fd/pone.0302723.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验