Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Psychother Psychosom. 2024;93(4):249-263. doi: 10.1159/000538404. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
In the treatment of borderline personality disorder (BPD), there is empirical support for both dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) and schema therapy (ST); these treatments have never been compared directly. This study examines whether either of them is more effective than the other in treating patients with BPD.
In this randomized, parallel-group, rater-blind clinical trial, outpatients aged between 18 and 65 years with a primary diagnosis of BPD were recruited in a tertiary outpatient treatment center (Lübeck, Germany). Participants were randomized to DBT or ST with one individual and one group session per week over 1.5 years. The primary outcome was the BPD symptom severity assessed with the mean score of the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index at 1-year naturalistic follow-up.
Between November 26, 2014, and December 14, 2018, we enrolled 164 patients (mean age = 33.7 [SD = 10.61] years). Of these, 81 (49.4%) were treated with ST and 83 (50.6%) with DBT, overall, 130 (79.3%) were female. Intention-to-treat analysis with generalized linear mixed models did not show a significant difference at 1-year naturalistic follow-up between DBT and ST for the BPDSI total score (mean difference 3.32 [95% CI: -0.58-7.22], p = 0.094, d = -24 [-0.69; 0.20]) with lower scores for DBT. Pre-to-follow-up effect sizes were large in both groups (DBT: d = 2.45 [1.88-3.02], ST: d = 1.78 [1.26-2.29]).
Patients in both treatment groups showed substantial improvements indicating that even severely affected patients with BPD and various comorbid disorders can be treated successfully with DBT and ST. An additional non-inferiority trial is needed to show if both treatments are equally effective. The trial was retrospectively registered on the German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00011534 without protocol changes.
在治疗边缘型人格障碍(BPD)方面,辩证行为疗法(DBT)和图式疗法(ST)都有经验支持;这些治疗方法从未被直接比较过。本研究旨在检验这两种方法在治疗 BPD 患者方面,哪种方法更有效。
这是一项随机、平行分组、盲评定的临床试验,在德国吕贝克的一家三级门诊治疗中心招募了年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间、原发性 BPD 诊断的门诊患者。参与者被随机分配到 DBT 或 ST 组,每周接受一次个体治疗和一次团体治疗,为期 1.5 年。主要结局是在 1 年自然随访时使用边缘型人格障碍严重程度指数的平均评分评估 BPD 症状严重程度。
2014 年 11 月 26 日至 2018 年 12 月 14 日,我们共招募了 164 名患者(平均年龄=33.7[SD=10.61]岁)。其中 81 名(49.4%)接受了 ST 治疗,83 名(50.6%)接受了 DBT 治疗,共有 130 名(79.3%)为女性。意向治疗分析的广义线性混合模型显示,1 年自然随访时,DBT 和 ST 治疗组的 BPDSI 总分无显著差异(平均差异 3.32[95%CI:-0.58-7.22],p=0.094,d=-2.4[0.69;0.20]),DBT 组的评分较低。两组的预治疗到随访的效应量均较大(DBT:d=2.45[1.88-3.02],ST:d=1.78[1.26-2.29])。
两组治疗组的患者均有显著改善,这表明即使是患有 BPD 和各种合并症的严重受影响患者,也可以成功地接受 DBT 和 ST 治疗。需要进行一项非劣效性试验,以证明两种治疗方法是否同样有效。该试验在德国临床试验注册中心(DRKS00011534)进行了回顾性注册,未更改方案。