Vonderlin Ruben, Boritz Tali, Claus Carola, Senyüz Büsra, Mahalingam Saskia, Tennenhouse Rachel, Lis Stefanie, Schmahl Christian, Margraf Jürgen, Teismann Tobias, Kleindienst Nikolaus, McMain Shelley, Bohus Martin
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Partner Site Mannheim - Heidelberg - Ulm, Mannheim, Germany.
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 14;9:e66181. doi: 10.2196/66181.
The potential of telehealth psychotherapy (ie, the online delivery of treatment via a video web-based platform) is gaining increased attention. However, there is skepticism about its acceptance, safety, and efficacy for patients with high emotional and behavioral dysregulation.
This study aims to provide initial effect size estimates of symptom change from pre- to post treatment, and the acceptance and safety of telehealth dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) for individuals diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD).
A total of 39 individuals meeting the DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [Fifth Edition]) criteria for BPD received 1 year of outpatient telehealth DBT at 3 sites in Germany and Canada. Effect size estimates were assessed using pre-post measures of BPD symptoms, dissociation, and quality of life. Safety was evaluated by analyzing suicide attempts and self-harm. Additionally, acceptance and feasibility, satisfaction with treatment, useability of the telehealth format, and the quality of the therapeutic alliance were assessed from both therapists' and patients' perspectives. All analyses were conducted on both the intention-to-treat (ITT) and according-to-protocol (ATP) samples.
Analyses showed significant and large pre-post effect sizes for BPD symptoms (d=1.13 in the ITT sample and d=1.44 in the ATP sample; P<.001) and for quality of life (d=0.65 in the ITT sample and d=1.24 in the ATP sample). Dissociative symptoms showed small to nonsignificant reductions. Self-harm behaviors decreased significantly from 80% to 28% of all patients showing at least 1 self-harm behavior in the last 10 weeks (risk ratio 0.35). A high dropout rate of 38% was observed. One low-lethality suicide attempt was reported. Acceptance, feasibility, and satisfaction measures were high, although therapists reported only moderate useability of the telehealth format.
Telehealth DBT for BPD showed large pre-post effect sizes for BPD symptoms and quality of life. While the telehealth format appeared feasible and well-accepted, the dropout rate was relatively high. Future research should compare the efficacy of telehealth DBT with in-person formats in randomized controlled trials. Overall, telehealth DBT might offer a potentially effective alternative treatment option, enhancing treatment accessibility. However, strategies for decreasing drop-out should be considered.
German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00027824; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00027824.
远程健康心理治疗(即通过基于网络视频平台进行治疗)的潜力正受到越来越多的关注。然而,对于情绪和行为高度失调的患者而言,人们对其接受度、安全性及疗效存在怀疑。
本研究旨在初步评估治疗前后症状变化的效应量,以及远程健康辩证行为疗法(DBT)对被诊断为边缘型人格障碍(BPD)个体的接受度和安全性。
共有39名符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册(第五版)》(DSM - 5)中BPD标准的个体,在德国和加拿大的3个地点接受了为期1年的门诊远程健康DBT治疗。使用BPD症状、解离及生活质量的治疗前后测量值评估效应量。通过分析自杀未遂和自我伤害情况评估安全性。此外,从治疗师和患者的角度评估接受度和可行性、对治疗的满意度、远程健康形式的可用性以及治疗联盟的质量。所有分析均在意向性分析(ITT)样本和符合方案分析(ATP)样本上进行。
分析显示,BPD症状(ITT样本中d = 1.13,ATP样本中d = 1.44;P <.001)和生活质量(ITT样本中d = 0.65,ATP样本中d = 1.24)在治疗前后有显著且较大的效应量。解离症状有小到不显著的减轻。在过去10周内,至少有1次自我伤害行为的所有患者中,自我伤害行为从80%显著降至28%(风险比0.35)。观察到较高的38%的脱落率。报告了1次低致死率的自杀未遂事件。接受度、可行性和满意度指标较高,尽管治疗师报告远程健康形式的可用性仅为中等。
针对BPD的远程健康DBT在BPD症状和生活质量方面显示出较大的治疗前后效应量。虽然远程健康形式似乎可行且接受度良好,但脱落率相对较高。未来研究应在随机对照试验中比较远程健康DBT与面对面治疗形式的疗效。总体而言,远程健康DBT可能提供一种潜在有效的替代治疗选择,提高治疗的可及性。然而,应考虑降低脱落率的策略。
德国临床试验注册中心DRKS00027824;https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00027824 。