Suppr超能文献

社区药剂师对核对处方的态度:一项横断面调查。

Community pharmacists' attitudes towards checking prescriptions: a cross-sectional survey.

机构信息

Faculty of Science and Engineering, Unit of Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology and Economy, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.

Pharmacy De Drie Stellingen, Brink 1-101, 8431 LD Oosterwolde, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Pharm Pract. 2024 Sep 3;32(5):363-368. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riae030.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The final prescription check is a mandatory but time-consuming process in Dutch community pharmacies. A safer dispensing process may have made the final prescription check obsolete.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the final prescription check in Dutch community pharmacies and explore pharmacists' attitudes towards changing this.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey among Dutch community pharmacists. The online questionnaire was based on literature and previous qualitative research, piloted in three pharmacies, and took 10 min to complete. Results were analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

A total of 409 pharmacists participated. They saw the final prescription check as an important quality assurance of the dispensing process. Nevertheless, most pharmacists agreed that the final prescription check could be optimized as they thought that the time invested outweighed the benefits. Automation of the dispensing process, only checking selected high-risk prescriptions, and more in-process checks could reduce the need for an extensive final prescription check, rather than delegating the task to assistants. To implement changes, most pharmacists felt current dispensing guidelines needed to be adapted.

CONCLUSION

There was a widespread consensus that optimizing the final prescription check could enhance efficiency and allow more time for person-centred care. Most pharmacists expressed a preference for updated guidelines before implementing such changes.

摘要

背景

最终处方审核是荷兰社区药店的一项强制性但耗时的流程。更安全的配药流程可能使最终处方审核变得多余。

目的

描述荷兰社区药店的最终处方审核,并探讨药剂师对此项流程改变的态度。

方法

对荷兰社区药剂师进行横断面调查。在线问卷基于文献和先前的定性研究制定,在三家药店进行了试点,完成时间为 10 分钟。结果采用描述性分析。

结果

共有 409 名药剂师参与了调查。他们认为最终处方审核是配药流程质量保证的重要环节。然而,大多数药剂师认为最终处方审核可以得到优化,因为他们认为投入的时间超过了收益。通过自动化配药流程、仅审核选定的高风险处方以及增加过程中的检查,可以减少对广泛的最终处方审核的需求,而不是将任务交给助手。为了实施改变,大多数药剂师认为需要调整现行的配药指南。

结论

普遍共识认为,优化最终处方审核可以提高效率,为以患者为中心的护理留出更多时间。大多数药剂师表示,在实施此类改变之前,他们更倾向于更新指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验