Suppr超能文献

从国际视角看急诊医护人员的幸福感体验和认知:范围综述。

Emergency department workforces' experiences and perceptions of well-being from an international perspective: a scoping review.

机构信息

Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 9;14(7):e087485. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087485.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify and present the available evidence regarding workforce well-being in the emergency department.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

SETTING

The emergency department (ED).

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched with no publication time parameters. The reference lists of articles selected for full-text review were also screened for additional papers.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION

All peer-reviewed, empirical papers were included if: (1) participants included staff-based full-time in the ED, (2) ED workforce well-being was a key component of the research, (3) English language was available and (4) the main focus was not burnout or other mental illness-related variables.

RESULTS

The search identified 6109 papers and 34 papers were included in the review. Most papers used a quantitative or mixed methods survey design, with very limited evidence using in-depth qualitative methods to explore ED workforce well-being. Interventions accounted for 41% of reviewed studies. Findings highlighted pressing issues with ED workforce well-being, contributed to by a range of interpersonal, organisational and individual challenges (eg, high workloads, lack of support). However, the limited evidence base, tenuous conceptualisations and links to well-being in existing literature mean that the findings were neither consistent nor conclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review highlights the need for more high-quality research to be conducted, particularly using qualitative methods and the development of a working definition of ED workforce well-being.

摘要

目的

识别和呈现有关急诊科劳动力健康的现有证据。

设计

范围审查。

设置

急诊科(ED)。

数据来源

CINAHL、MEDLINE、APA PsycINFO 和 Web of Science 进行了搜索,没有发布时间参数。还对选定全文审查的文章的参考文献列表进行了筛选,以查找其他论文。

研究选择的资格标准

如果符合以下条件,则包括所有经过同行评审的实证论文:(1)参与者包括 ED 全职工作人员,(2)ED 劳动力健康是研究的关键组成部分,(3)提供英文版本,以及(4)主要重点不是倦怠或其他与心理健康相关的变量。

结果

搜索确定了 6109 篇论文,其中 34 篇论文被纳入审查。大多数论文使用定量或混合方法调查设计,只有非常有限的证据使用深入的定性方法来探索 ED 劳动力健康。干预措施占审查研究的 41%。研究结果强调了 ED 劳动力健康的紧迫问题,这些问题是由一系列人际、组织和个人挑战(例如,工作量大、缺乏支持)造成的。然而,现有的证据基础有限、概念化不明确以及与现有文献中健康的联系,意味着研究结果既不一致也不具结论性。

结论

这项范围审查强调需要进行更多高质量的研究,特别是使用定性方法和制定 ED 劳动力健康的工作定义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae9c/11288155/0046efd433a4/bmjopen-14-7-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验