Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Ann Palliat Med. 2024 Jul;13(4):963-975. doi: 10.21037/apm-23-529. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a treatment modality that has been increasingly used for the management of chronic shoulder pain. Serious conditions that can identified as the cause of chronic shoulder pain include rotator cuff disorders, adhesive capsulitis, osteoarthritis, glenohumeral instability, and acromioclavicular joint disorders. Treatment of chronic shoulder pain typically consists of physical therapy, oral and topical medications, intra-articular corticosteroid injections, and even surgery. The aim of this study was to examine the most recent primary and secondary outcomes of RFA for chronic shoulder pain.
A systematic review was conducted using three different databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database. The key concepts of "radiofrequency ablation" and "shoulder pain" were used. The search took place in June 2023, and it included articles from the past 20 years.
Of the 396 articles found, 29 were included in the review. Most studies focused on reduction in pain scores, duration of relief, function, and patient satisfaction. In several studies, RFA was compared to conservative options such as physical therapy or corticosteroid injections.
Overall, RFA shows positive outcomes in terms of the management of chronic shoulder pain. Therefore, RFA can serve as another treatment option for patients who fail conservative management or are not strong surgical candidates. Understanding the outcomes of RFA for chronic shoulder pain can provide patients and clinicians with evidence for the most appropriate treatment.
射频消融 (RFA) 是一种治疗方式,已越来越多地用于慢性肩痛的治疗。可明确为慢性肩痛病因的严重疾病包括肩袖疾病、粘连性肩关节囊炎、骨关节炎、盂肱关节不稳定和肩锁关节疾病。慢性肩痛的治疗通常包括物理治疗、口服和局部药物治疗、关节内皮质类固醇注射,甚至手术。本研究旨在探讨射频消融治疗慢性肩痛的最新主要和次要结局。
使用包括 PubMed、MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 数据库在内的三个不同数据库进行系统评价。使用了“射频消融”和“肩痛”这两个关键概念。搜索于 2023 年 6 月进行,包括过去 20 年的文章。
在 396 篇文章中,有 29 篇被纳入综述。大多数研究侧重于疼痛评分的降低、缓解持续时间、功能和患者满意度。在一些研究中,RFA 与保守治疗方案(如物理治疗或皮质类固醇注射)进行了比较。
总体而言,RFA 在慢性肩痛的治疗方面显示出积极的结果。因此,对于保守治疗失败或不适合手术的患者,RFA 可以作为另一种治疗选择。了解 RFA 治疗慢性肩痛的结果可以为患者和临床医生提供最适当治疗的证据。