• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ChatGPT 在文本改写和降低抄袭方面的能力:描述性分析。

The Ability of ChatGPT in Paraphrasing Texts and Reducing Plagiarism: A Descriptive Analysis.

机构信息

Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Department of Internal Medicine, Yale New Haven Health Bridgeport Hospital, Bridgeport, NY, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Jul 8;10:e53308. doi: 10.2196/53308.

DOI:10.2196/53308
PMID:38989841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11250043/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The introduction of ChatGPT by OpenAI has garnered significant attention. Among its capabilities, paraphrasing stands out.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the satisfactory levels of plagiarism in the paraphrased text produced by this chatbot.

METHODS

Three texts of varying lengths were presented to ChatGPT. ChatGPT was then instructed to paraphrase the provided texts using five different prompts. In the subsequent stage of the study, the texts were divided into separate paragraphs, and ChatGPT was requested to paraphrase each paragraph individually. Lastly, in the third stage, ChatGPT was asked to paraphrase the texts it had previously generated.

RESULTS

The average plagiarism rate in the texts generated by ChatGPT was 45% (SD 10%). ChatGPT exhibited a substantial reduction in plagiarism for the provided texts (mean difference -0.51, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.48; P<.001). Furthermore, when comparing the second attempt with the initial attempt, a significant decrease in the plagiarism rate was observed (mean difference -0.06, 95% CI -0.08 to -0.03; P<.001). The number of paragraphs in the texts demonstrated a noteworthy association with the percentage of plagiarism, with texts consisting of a single paragraph exhibiting the lowest plagiarism rate (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although ChatGPT demonstrates a notable reduction of plagiarism within texts, the existing levels of plagiarism remain relatively high. This underscores a crucial caution for researchers when incorporating this chatbot into their work.

摘要

背景

OpenAI 推出的 ChatGPT 引起了广泛关注。它的能力之一是改写。

目的

本研究旨在调查这个聊天机器人生成的改写文本中的抄袭程度满意度。

方法

向 ChatGPT 呈现了三个不同长度的文本。然后,指示 ChatGPT 使用五个不同的提示来改写提供的文本。在研究的下一阶段,将文本分成单独的段落,并要求 ChatGPT 单独改写每个段落。最后,在第三阶段,要求 ChatGPT 改写它之前生成的文本。

结果

ChatGPT 生成的文本的平均抄袭率为 45%(SD 10%)。ChatGPT 对提供的文本表现出显著减少的抄袭(平均差异-0.51,95%置信区间-0.54 至-0.48;P<.001)。此外,与初始尝试相比,第二次尝试时抄袭率显著降低(平均差异-0.06,95%置信区间-0.08 至-0.03;P<.001)。文本中的段落数与抄袭率呈显著相关,包含单个段落的文本表现出最低的抄袭率(P<.001)。

结论

尽管 ChatGPT 在文本内显示出显著减少的抄袭,但现有的抄袭水平仍然相对较高。这突显出研究人员在将这个聊天机器人纳入其工作时需要谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ae/11250043/8c49a6fd682c/mededu-v10-e53308-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ae/11250043/8c49a6fd682c/mededu-v10-e53308-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ae/11250043/8c49a6fd682c/mededu-v10-e53308-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Ability of ChatGPT in Paraphrasing Texts and Reducing Plagiarism: A Descriptive Analysis.ChatGPT 在文本改写和降低抄袭方面的能力:描述性分析。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Jul 8;10:e53308. doi: 10.2196/53308.
2
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.预防科研与出版领域不当行为并促进诚信的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):MR000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2.
3
Stench of Errors or the Shine of Potential: The Challenge of (Ir)Responsible Use of ChatGPT in Speech-Language Pathology.错误的恶臭还是潜力的光辉:言语病理学中(不)负责任地使用ChatGPT的挑战。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70088. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70088.
4
Large Language Models and Empathy: Systematic Review.大语言模型与同理心:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 11;26:e52597. doi: 10.2196/52597.
5
Examining the Role of Large Language Models in Orthopedics: Systematic Review.检查大型语言模型在骨科中的作用:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 15;26:e59607. doi: 10.2196/59607.
6
Performance of 3 Conversational Generative Artificial Intelligence Models for Computing Maximum Safe Doses of Local Anesthetics: Comparative Analysis.用于计算局部麻醉药最大安全剂量的3种对话式生成人工智能模型的性能:比较分析
JMIR AI. 2025 May 13;4:e66796. doi: 10.2196/66796.
7
Performance of ChatGPT-4o and Four Open-Source Large Language Models in Generating Diagnoses Based on China's Rare Disease Catalog: Comparative Study.ChatGPT-4o与四个开源大语言模型基于中国罕见病目录生成诊断的性能:比较研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 18;27:e69929. doi: 10.2196/69929.
8
Feasibility of Using ChatGPT to Generate Exposure Hierarchies for Treating Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.使用ChatGPT生成用于治疗强迫症的暴露等级的可行性。
Behav Ther. 2025 Jul;56(4):680-688. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2025.02.005. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
9
Evaluating a Large Language Model's Ability to Synthesize a Health Science Master's Thesis: Case Study.评估大型语言模型合成健康科学硕士论文的能力:案例研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 3;9:e73248. doi: 10.2196/73248.
10
Development and Validation of a Large Language Model-Powered Chatbot for Neurosurgery: Mixed Methods Study on Enhancing Perioperative Patient Education.用于神经外科手术的基于大语言模型的聊天机器人的开发与验证:关于加强围手术期患者教育的混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 15;27:e74299. doi: 10.2196/74299.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating AI-Generated Patient Education Guides: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT and Deepseek.评估人工智能生成的患者教育指南:ChatGPT与豆包的比较研究。 需注意,原文中是ChatGPT和Deepseek,你提供的原文有误,我按照正确的Deepseek进行了翻译,若实际需求是其他,请告知。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 3;17(6):e85277. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85277. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Artificial intelligence in endoscopy and colonoscopy: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global research trends.内镜检查和结肠镜检查中的人工智能:全球研究趋势的综合文献计量分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 30;12:1532640. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1532640. eCollection 2025.
3
Delving into the Practical Applications and Pitfalls of Large Language Models in Medical Education: Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
ChatGPT: Friend or foe in medical writing? An example of how ChatGPT can be utilized in writing case reports.ChatGPT:医学写作中的朋友还是敌人?一个关于如何在撰写病例报告中使用ChatGPT的例子。
Surg Pract Sci. 2023 Jun 2;14:100185. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100185. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
The Prevalence of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Iranian Children and Adult Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.伊朗儿童和成人非酒精性脂肪性肝病的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Iran J Public Health. 2023 Aug;52(8):1600-1612. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i8.13399.
3
The Acceptable Text Similarity Level in Manuscripts Submitted to Scientific Journals.
深入探讨大语言模型在医学教育中的实际应用与陷阱:叙述性综述
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Apr 18;16:625-636. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S497020. eCollection 2025.
4
Bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence applications in cardiovascular imaging: trends, impact, and emerging research areas.心血管成像中人工智能应用的文献计量分析:趋势、影响及新兴研究领域
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Feb 28;87(4):1947-1968. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003080. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular procedures: a bibliometric and visual analysis study.心血管手术中的人工智能:一项文献计量与可视化分析研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Feb 28;87(4):2187-2203. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003112. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
Enhancing English abstract quality for non-English speaking authors using ChatGPT: A comparative study of Taiwan, Japan, China, and South Korea with slope graphs.利用 ChatGPT 提高非英语母语作者英文摘要质量:使用斜率图对中国台湾、日本、中国和韩国进行的比较研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 4;103(40):e39796. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039796.
投稿到科学期刊的文稿可接受的文本相似度水平。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Aug 7;38(31):e240. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e240.
4
ChatGPT can pass the AHA exams: Open-ended questions outperform multiple-choice format.ChatGPT 可以通过 AHA 考试:开放式问题优于多项选择题格式。
Resuscitation. 2023 Jul;188:109783. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109783.
5
ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations.医学领域的ChatGPT:其应用、优势、局限性、未来前景及伦理考量概述
Front Artif Intell. 2023 May 4;6:1169595. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1169595. eCollection 2023.
6
Exploring the Boundaries of Reality: Investigating the Phenomenon of Artificial Intelligence Hallucination in Scientific Writing Through ChatGPT References.探索现实的边界:通过ChatGPT参考文献研究科学写作中的人工智能幻觉现象。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 11;15(4):e37432. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37432. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
Opportunities and risks of ChatGPT in medicine, science, and academic publishing: a modern Promethean dilemma.ChatGPT在医学、科学和学术出版领域的机遇与风险:现代普罗米修斯式困境。
Croat Med J. 2023 Feb 28;64(1):1-3. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2023.64.1.
8
ChatGPT and the Future of Medical Writing.ChatGPT与医学写作的未来。
Radiology. 2023 Apr;307(2):e223312. doi: 10.1148/radiol.223312. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
9
ChatGPT: evolution or revolution?ChatGPT:进化还是革命?
Med Health Care Philos. 2023 Mar;26(1):1-2. doi: 10.1007/s11019-023-10136-0.
10
Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists.由ChatGPT撰写的摘要愚弄了科学家。
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7944):423. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7.