Suppr超能文献

配子捐赠预测因素:一项横断面调查研究。

Predictors of gamete donation: a cross sectional survey study.

机构信息

Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Department of Environment Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

出版信息

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Sep;41(9):2327-2336. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03194-7. Epub 2024 Jul 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In 2015, assisted reproductive technology (ART) accounted for 1.7% of all U.S. births, donor eggs accounted for over 17,000 started cycles in 2015, and donor sperm accounting for 6.2% of all cycles started in 2014. With increasing utilization of donor gametes as a method of assisting patients with infertility, the number of babies born each year utilizing gamete donation will also continue to increase. This study aimed to elucidate factors impacting decision to donate, amongst a representative national population.

METHODS

A survey was distributed via the internet utilizing SurveyMonkey Enterprise with HIPAA compliance. Univariate regressions and frequencies were conducted between each demographic and personal characteristic and the willingness to donate. Log Binomial and linear regression was used categorical and continuous variables, and Risk ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

In this large survey study, 64% of men and 50% of women reported they would be willing to donate gametes, with the majority desiring monetary compensation. Men with a high Consumer Financial Protection Bureau score were less likely to report that they would consider donating sperm compared to a medium high CFPB score. No other financial indicators were associated with considering donating sperm. There were no associations between CFPB score and egg donation outcomes. Black or African American women were less likely to consider donating their eggs compared to other groups, and more likely to desire > $5000 in compensation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large survey study, a small minority of participants reported they would be willing to donate to an unknown infertility patient for reproductive purposes. High and very high CFPB scores were associated with willingness to donate games, but not with desire for monetary compensation or amount.

摘要

目的

2015 年,辅助生殖技术(ART)占美国总出生数的 1.7%,当年供卵者周期数超过 17000 个,而供精者周期数占 2014 年总周期数的 6.2%。随着越来越多的患者选择使用供精/卵来辅助生育,每年通过配子捐赠出生的婴儿数量也将继续增加。本研究旨在阐明在具有代表性的全国人群中,影响捐赠决策的因素。

方法

通过 SurveyMonkey Enterprise 互联网平台以 HIPAA 合规的方式发放调查问卷。对每个人口统计学和个人特征与捐赠意愿之间进行单变量回归和频率分析。采用对数二项式和线性回归对分类和连续变量进行分析,并计算风险比。

结果

在这项大型调查研究中,64%的男性和 50%的女性表示愿意捐赠配子,其中大多数人希望获得经济补偿。消费者金融保护局评分较高的男性与评分中高的男性相比,报告称他们更有可能考虑捐赠精子。其他财务指标与考虑捐赠精子无关。消费者金融保护局评分与卵子捐赠结果之间无关联。与其他群体相比,黑人和非裔美国女性更不愿意考虑捐赠卵子,而她们更希望获得超过 5000 美元的补偿。

结论

在这项大型调查研究中,少数参与者表示愿意为生殖目的向未知的不孕患者捐赠配子。高和非常高的消费者金融保护局评分与捐赠配子的意愿相关,但与经济补偿的需求或金额无关。

相似文献

1
Predictors of gamete donation: a cross sectional survey study.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Sep;41(9):2327-2336. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03194-7. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
2
6
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 31;2014(10):CD008046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008046.pub4.
7
Personal interest and attitudes towards oocyte donation practice: a cross-sectional survey among Dutch-speaking young women in Belgium.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Feb;42(2):441-449. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03381-6. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
9
Antioxidants for male subfertility.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(12):CD007411. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007411.pub3. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
10
In vitro maturation in subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing assisted reproduction.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 6;2(2):CD006606. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006606.pub5.

引用本文的文献

1
Black sperm donors: motivations and hesitations.
F S Rep. 2025 Mar 14;6(2):231-233. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2025.03.004. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
An analysis of the outcome of 11 712 men applying to be sperm donors in Denmark and the USA.
Hum Reprod. 2023 Mar 1;38(3):352-358. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac264.
2
Alignment between expectations and experiences of egg donors: what does it mean to be informed?
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020 Sep 19;12:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.08.003. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2016.
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019 Apr 26;68(4):1-23. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6804a1.
5
Limitations on the compensation of gamete donors: a public opinion survey.
Fertil Steril. 2017 Jun;107(6):1355-1363.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
6
Financial compensation of oocyte donors: an Ethics Committee opinion.
Fertil Steril. 2016 Dec;106(7):e15-e19. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.040. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
8
Kamakahi vs ASRM and the future of compensation for human eggs.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;213(2):186-187.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.046. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
9
A systematic review of sperm donors: demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation.
Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):37-51. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms039. Epub 2012 Nov 11.
10
Looking back: egg donors' retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle.
Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):455-66. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.081. Epub 2008 Nov 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验