Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Adv Ther. 2024 Sep;41(9):3722-3735. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02928-4. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
Some Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors such as ruxolitinib and fedratinib do not address and may worsen anemia in patients with myelofibrosis. In these cases, the JAK inhibitor may be continued at a reduced dose in an effort to maintain splenic and symptom control, with supportive therapy and/or red blood cell (RBC) transfusions added to manage anemia. This post hoc descriptive analysis of the phase 3 SIMPLIFY-2 trial evaluated the relative benefits of this approach versus switching to the JAK1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor momelotinib in patients for whom anemia management is a key consideration.
SIMPLIFY-2 was a randomized (2:1), open-label, phase 3 trial of momelotinib versus best available therapy (BAT; 88.5% continued ruxolitinib) in JAK inhibitor-experienced patients with myelofibrosis (n = 156). Patient subgroups (n = 105 each) were defined by either baseline (1) hemoglobin (Hb) of < 100 g/L or (2) non-transfusion independence (not meeting the criteria of no transfusions and no Hb of < 80 g/L for the previous 12 weeks); outcomes have been summarized descriptively.
In both subgroups of interest, week 24 transfusion independence rates were higher with momelotinib versus BAT/ruxolitinib: baseline Hb of < 100 g/L, 22 (33.3%) versus 5 (12.8%); baseline non-transfusion independent, 25 (34.7%) versus 1 (3.0%). Mean Hb levels over time were also generally higher in both subgroups with momelotinib, despite median transfusion rates through week 24 with momelotinib being comparable to or lower than with BAT/ruxolitinib. Spleen and symptom response rates with momelotinib in these subgroups were comparable to the intent-to-treat population, while rates with BAT/ruxolitinib were lower.
In patients with moderate-to-severe anemia and/or in need of RBC transfusions, outcomes were improved by switching to momelotinib rather than continuing ruxolitinib and using anemia supportive therapies.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02101268.
一些 Janus 激酶 (JAK) 抑制剂,如芦可替尼和 fedratinib,无法解决骨髓纤维化患者的贫血问题,甚至可能使贫血恶化。在这种情况下,可能会以较低剂量继续使用 JAK 抑制剂,以努力维持脾脏和症状控制,并添加支持性治疗和/或红细胞 (RBC) 输注来治疗贫血。这项针对 3 期 SIMPLIFY-2 试验的事后描述性分析评估了这种方法与转换为 JAK1/JAK2/激活素 A 受体 1 抑制剂 momelotinib 相比,在贫血管理是关键考虑因素的患者中的相对益处。
SIMPLIFY-2 是一项随机(2:1)、开放标签、3 期 momelotinib 与最佳可用治疗(BAT;88.5%继续使用芦可替尼)在骨髓纤维化(n=156)的 JAK 抑制剂经验丰富的患者中的试验。根据基线(1)血红蛋白(Hb)<100g/L 或(2)非输血独立性(不符合前 12 周内无输血和 Hb<80g/L 的标准),患者亚组(n=105 人)被定义;结果以描述性方式进行总结。
在这两个感兴趣的亚组中,与 BAT/ruxolitinib 相比,momelotinib 在第 24 周时的输血独立性更高:基线 Hb<100g/L,分别为 22(33.3%)和 5(12.8%);基线非输血独立,分别为 25(34.7%)和 1(3.0%)。尽管 momelotinib 到第 24 周的中位输血率与 BAT/ruxolitinib 相似或更低,但在这两个亚组中,momelotinib 治疗的平均 Hb 水平随时间推移也普遍更高。在这些亚组中,momelotinib 的脾脏和症状反应率与意向治疗人群相当,而 BAT/ruxolitinib 的反应率较低。
对于中重度贫血和/或需要输血的患者,与继续使用 ruxolitinib 并使用贫血支持性治疗相比,改用 momelotinib 可改善结局。
ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02101268。