• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国食品药品监督管理局关于JUUL禁令政策在推特上的公众认知与讨论:观察性研究

Public Perceptions and Discussions of the US Food and Drug Administration's JUUL Ban Policy on Twitter: Observational Study.

作者信息

Liu Pinxin, Lou Xubin, Xie Zidian, Shang Ce, Li Dongmei

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.

Goergen Institute for Data Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jul 11;8:e51327. doi: 10.2196/51327.

DOI:10.2196/51327
PMID:38990633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11273066/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

On June 23, 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration announced a JUUL ban policy, to ban all vaping and electronic cigarette products sold by Juul Labs.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to understand public perceptions and discussions of this policy using Twitter (subsequently rebranded as X) data.

METHODS

Using the Twitter streaming application programming interface, 17,007 tweets potentially related to the JUUL ban policy were collected between June 22, 2022, and July 25, 2022. Based on 2600 hand-coded tweets, a deep learning model (RoBERTa) was trained to classify all tweets into propolicy, antipolicy, neutral, and irrelevant categories. A deep learning model (M3 model) was used to estimate basic demographics (such as age and gender) of Twitter users. Furthermore, major topics were identified using latent Dirichlet allocation modeling. A logistic regression model was used to examine the association of different Twitter users with their attitudes toward the policy.

RESULTS

Among 10,480 tweets related to the JUUL ban policy, there were similar proportions of propolicy and antipolicy tweets (n=2777, 26.5% vs n=2666, 25.44%). Major propolicy topics included "JUUL causes youth addition," "market surge of JUUL," and "health effects of JUUL." In contrast, major antipolicy topics included "cigarette should be banned instead of JUUL," "against the irrational policy," and "emotional catharsis." Twitter users older than 29 years were more likely to be propolicy (have a positive attitude toward the JUUL ban policy) than those younger than 29 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that the public showed different responses to the JUUL ban policy, which varies depending on the demographic characteristics of Twitter users. Our findings could provide valuable information to the Food and Drug Administration for future electronic cigarette and other tobacco product regulations.

摘要

背景

2022年6月23日,美国食品药品监督管理局宣布了一项针对悦刻的禁令政策,禁止悦刻实验室销售的所有电子烟和电子烟产品。

目的

本研究旨在利用推特(后更名为X)数据了解公众对该政策的看法和讨论。

方法

使用推特流式应用程序编程接口,在2022年6月22日至2022年7月25日期间收集了17007条可能与悦刻禁令政策相关的推文。基于2600条人工编码的推文,训练了一个深度学习模型(RoBERTa),将所有推文分类为支持政策、反对政策、中立和不相关类别。使用深度学习模型(M3模型)来估计推特用户的基本人口统计学特征(如年龄和性别)。此外,使用潜在狄利克雷分配模型确定主要话题。使用逻辑回归模型来检验不同推特用户与其对该政策的态度之间的关联。

结果

在10480条与悦刻禁令政策相关的推文中,支持政策和反对政策的推文比例相似(分别为2777条,占26.5%;2666条,占25.44%)。主要的支持政策话题包括“悦刻导致青少年上瘾”、“悦刻市场激增”和“悦刻对健康的影响”。相比之下,主要的反对政策话题包括“应该禁止香烟而不是悦刻”、“反对不合理政策”和“情绪宣泄”。29岁以上的推特用户比29岁以下的用户更有可能支持政策(对悦刻禁令政策持积极态度)。

结论

我们的研究表明,公众对悦刻禁令政策表现出不同的反应,这取决于推特用户的人口统计学特征。我们的研究结果可以为食品药品监督管理局未来制定电子烟和其他烟草产品法规提供有价值的信息。

相似文献

1
Public Perceptions and Discussions of the US Food and Drug Administration's JUUL Ban Policy on Twitter: Observational Study.美国食品药品监督管理局关于JUUL禁令政策在推特上的公众认知与讨论:观察性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jul 11;8:e51327. doi: 10.2196/51327.
2
Public Response to Federal Electronic Cigarette Regulations Analyzed Using Social Media Data Through Natural Language Processing: Topic Modeling Study.利用自然语言处理技术分析社交媒体数据,了解公众对联邦电子烟监管政策的反应:主题建模研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 1;26:e58919. doi: 10.2196/58919.
3
Assessing the public discourse on Twitter: Reactions to the JUUL e-cigarettes ban in the United States.评估推特上的公众话语:对美国尤尔电子烟禁令的反应。
Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Feb 26;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/184053. eCollection 2024.
4
Public Reactions to the New York State Policy on Flavored Electronic Cigarettes on Twitter: Observational Study.公众对纽约州电子烟调味政策的反应:推特上的观察性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Feb 3;8(2):e25216. doi: 10.2196/25216.
5
Difficulty Regulating Social Media Content of Age-Restricted Products: Comparing JUUL's Official Twitter Timeline and Social Media Content About JUUL.规范年龄限制产品社交媒体内容的困难:比较JUUL的官方推特动态和关于JUUL的社交媒体内容
JMIR Infodemiology. 2021 Dec 7;1(1):e29011. doi: 10.2196/29011. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
6
Public perceptions of synthetic cooling agents in electronic cigarettes on Twitter.推特上公众对电子烟中合成冷却剂的看法。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 12;19(3):e0292412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292412. eCollection 2024.
7
Twitter Sentiment About the US Federal Tobacco 21 Law: Mixed Methods Analysis.关于美国联邦烟草21岁法案的推特情绪:混合方法分析。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Aug 31;7:e50346. doi: 10.2196/50346.
8
Public Perceptions of the Food and Drug Administration's Regulatory Authority Over Synthetic Nicotine on Twitter: Observational Study.公众对食品和药物管理局监管合成尼古丁权力的看法:Twitter 观察性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 19;8:e56371. doi: 10.2196/56371.
9
Public Perception of the Tobacco 21 Amendment on Twitter in the United States: Observational Study.美国社交媒体上公众对烟草 21 修正案的看法:观察性研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Sep 25;4:e53899. doi: 10.2196/53899.
10
Public Perceptions of the Food and Drug Administration's Proposed Rules Prohibiting Menthol Cigarettes on Twitter: Observational Study.公众对美国食品药品监督管理局关于在推特上禁止薄荷醇香烟的拟议规则的看法:观察性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Feb 10;7:e42706. doi: 10.2196/42706.

本文引用的文献

1
Breech birth care: Number 1 - 2024.臀位分娩护理:第1号 - 2024年
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024 Mar 15;46. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024FPS01. eCollection 2024.
2
Assessing the public discourse on Twitter: Reactions to the JUUL e-cigarettes ban in the United States.评估推特上的公众话语:对美国尤尔电子烟禁令的反应。
Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Feb 26;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/184053. eCollection 2024.
3
Public Perceptions of the Food and Drug Administration's Proposed Rules Prohibiting Menthol Cigarettes on Twitter: Observational Study.
公众对美国食品药品监督管理局关于在推特上禁止薄荷醇香烟的拟议规则的看法:观察性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Feb 10;7:e42706. doi: 10.2196/42706.
4
Notes from the Field: E-cigarette Use Among Middle and High School Students - United States, 2022.实地记录:2022年美国中学生使用电子烟情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Oct 7;71(40):1283-1285. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7140a3.
5
The Influence of Provaping "Gatewatchers" on the Dissemination of COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter: Analysis of Twitter Discourse Regarding Nicotine and the COVID-19 Pandemic.“伪电子烟监管者”对新冠疫情错误信息在推特上传播的影响:关于尼古丁和新冠大流行的推特话语分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 22;24(9):e40331. doi: 10.2196/40331.
6
Gender Differences in Reasons for Using Electronic Cigarettes: A Systematic Review.电子烟使用原因的性别差异:系统综述。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Aug 6;24(9):1355-1362. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac108.
7
Perception of the Food and Drug Administration Electronic Cigarette Flavor Enforcement Policy on Twitter: Observational Study.在 Twitter 上对食品和药物管理局电子烟口味执行政策的感知:观察性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Mar 29;8(3):e25697. doi: 10.2196/25697.
8
Tobacco Product Use and Associated Factors Among Middle and High School Students - National Youth Tobacco Survey, United States, 2021.中学生使用烟草制品及相关因素 - 2021 年美国全国青少年烟草调查。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2022 Mar 11;71(5):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7105a1.
9
Public Reactions to the New York State Policy on Flavored Electronic Cigarettes on Twitter: Observational Study.公众对纽约州电子烟调味政策的反应:推特上的观察性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Feb 3;8(2):e25216. doi: 10.2196/25216.
10
Public Response to a Social Media Tobacco Prevention Campaign: Content Analysis.公众对社交媒体烟草预防活动的反应:内容分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Dec 7;6(4):e20649. doi: 10.2196/20649.